Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-dtkg6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-08T16:25:31.466Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mass Transfer and Evolution in Long-Period Binary Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2016

R. F. Webbink*
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, University of Illinois, 1011 W. Springfield Ave., Urbana, Illinois 61801

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In the earliest studies of close binary evolution (Paczynski 1967; Kippenhahn, Kohl, and Weigert 1967; Plavec, et al. 1968), it was assumed that the total mass and orbital angular momentum of a binary system are conserved during mass transfer. This assumption of convenience actually succeeds quite well in producing model post-mass-transfer binaries which closely resemble classical Algol-type systems, and helium-star binaries such as KS Per and u Sgr as well (Plavec 1973; Schonberner and Drilling 1983). Among longer-period interacting binaries, however, there are strong reasons to believe that these simple assumptions break down. For example, it is well-known that single stars may lose a very substantial fraction of their mass in a stellar wind during ascent of the giant and asymptotic-giant branches (e.g., Kudritzki and Reimers 1978). In addition, many highly-evolved short-period binaries, such as the cataclysmic variables, appear to owe their origins to very long-period progenitors (Paczynski 1976; Ritter 1976; Webbink 1976). These latter systems evidently evolved through a common envelope phase (Paczynski 1976; Meyer and Meyer-Hofmeister 1979), in which the giant progenitor of the present white dwarf devoured its companion star, and ultimately was divested of its envelope by the release of orbital energy as that companion spiralled toward its core.

Type
Joint Discussions
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1986

References

Böhm-Vitense, E. 1980, Astrophys. J. (Letters), 239, L79.Google Scholar
Couselman, C.C. III 1973, Astrophys. J., 180, 307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, G.H. 1879, Proc. R. Soc. London, 29, 168.Google Scholar
Eggleton, P.P. 1985, paper presented at the NATO Advanced Research Workshop on “Evolution of Galactic X-Ray Binaries,” Tegernsee, FRG.Google Scholar
Gallagher, J.S., Holm, A.V., Anderson, C.M., and Webbink, R.F. 1979, Astrophys. J., 229, 994.Google Scholar
Giuricin, G., Mardirossian, F., and Mezzetti, M. 1983, Astrophys. J. Suppl., 52, 35.Google Scholar
Hjellming, M.S., and Webbink, R.F. 1985, Bull. Am. Astr. Soc, 17, 840.Google Scholar
Kenyon, S.J., and Webbink, R.F. 1984, Astrophys. J., 279, 252.Google Scholar
Kippenhahn, R., Kohl, K., and Weigert, A. 1967, Z. Astrophys., 66, 58.Google Scholar
Kudritzki, R.D., and Reimers, D. 1978, Astr. Astrophys., 70, 227.Google Scholar
Meyer, F., and Meyer-Hofmeister, E. 1979, Astr. Astrophys., 78, 167.Google Scholar
Paczynski, B. 1967, Acta Astr., 17, 193.Google Scholar
Paczynski, B. 1976, in IAU Symposium No. 73, Structure and Evolution of Close Binary Systems, ed, Eggleton, P., Mitton, S., and Whelan, J. (Dordrecht: Reidel), p. 75.Google Scholar
Paczynski, B., and Sienkiewicz, R. 1972, Acta Astr., 22, 73.Google Scholar
Paczynski, B., Ziołkowski, J., and Żytkow, A. 1969, in Mass Loss from Stars, ed. Hack, M. (Dordrecht: Reidel), p. 237.Google Scholar
Plavec, M. 1973, in IAU Symposium No. 51, Extended Atmospheres and Circumstellar Matter in Spectroscopic Binary Systems, ed. Batten, A.H. (Dordrecht: Reidel), p. 216.Google Scholar
Plavec, M., Křiž, S., Harmanec, P., and Horn, J. 1968, Bull. Astr. Inst. Czechoslovakia, 19, 24.Google Scholar
Ritter, H. 1976, Monthly Notices R. Astr. Soc, 175, 279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schönberner, D., and Drilling, J.S. 1983, Astrophys. J., 268, 225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webbink, R.F. 1976, Astrophys. J., 209, 829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webbink, R.F. 1986, in Critical Observations vs. Physical Models of Close Binary Systems, ed. Leung, K.-C. and Zhai, D.-S. (New York: Gordon and Breach), in press.Google Scholar