Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-qxsvm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-26T20:10:25.471Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Red Clump Stars – Further Improved Distance Indicator

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2016

P.M. Garnavich
Affiliation:
University of Notre Dame
K. Stanek
Affiliation:
University of Notre Dame

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The ideal distance indicator would be a standard candle abundant enough to provide many examples within reach of parallax measurements and sufficiently bright to be seen out to Local Group galaxies. The red clump stars closely match this description. These are the metal rich equivalent of the better known horizontal branch stars, and their brightness dispersion is only 0.2 mag (one sigma) in the Solar neighborhood. Using Hipparcos to calibrate a large, local sample, the red clump method has been used to measure accurate distances to the Galactic center (Paczyński & Stanek 1998), M31 (Stanek & Garnavich 1998), LMC (Udalski et al. 1998; Stanek et al. 1998; Udalski 1999) and some clusters in our Galaxy (e.g. 47Tuc: Kaluzny et al. 1998). As with all the distance indicators, the main worry lies in the possible systematics of the method, in particular, the brightness dependence on the stellar metallicity and age. These dependences have come under close scrutiny and, indeed, the population effects on the red clump brightness appear small and calibratable. Perhaps the most controversial result from the red clump method is the estimation of a “short” distance to the Large Magellanic Cloud (Udalski et al. 1998; Stanek, Zaritsky & Harris 1998; Udalski 2000). This distance to the LMC is shorter by 12% than the “standard” value, and has very important implications for the Cepheid distance scale and the determination of the Hubble constant.

Type
II. Joint Discussions
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of Pacific 2002

References

Kaluzny, J. et al. 1998, AJ, 115, 1016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paczyński, B., & Stanek, K.Z. 1998, ApJ, 494, L219 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanek, K., & Garnavich, P.M. 1998, ApJ, 503, L131 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanek, K., Zaritsky, D., & Harris, J. 1998, ApJ, 500, L141 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Udalski, A. 2000, ApJ, 531, L25 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Udalski, A., et al. 1998, Acta Astr., 48, 1 Google Scholar