Hostname: page-component-68945f75b7-gkscv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-06T04:10:41.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Variability of The Oort Cloud Comet Flux: Can It be Manifest in The Cratering Record?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

J.J. Matese ,
P.G. Whitman ,
K.A. Innanen  and
M.J. Valtonen
J.J. Matese
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, The University of Southwestern Louisiana Lafayette, Louisiana, 70501-1210 USA
P.G. Whitman
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, The University of Southwestern Louisiana Lafayette, Louisiana, 70501-1210 USA
K.A. Innanen
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, York University, Ontario, Canada
M.J. Valtonen
Affiliation:
Tuorla Observatory, Turku University, Finland

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We consider the subject of time dependence of the Oort cloud comet flux. Over long time scales the flux is likely to be dominated by the adiabatic galactic tide. This tide is substantially modulated as the Solar System moves in its galactic orbit. If Shoemaker was correct in his estimate that virtually all terrestrial craters of diameter > 100 km are produced by long period comets, then the phase and plane crossing period of the Solar System about the galactic disk should be consistent. with the ages of accurately dated large craters. A time series analysis of these ages in which the Solar oscillation phase is fixed to be consistent with observations indicates a maximal correlation for a period of 36 ± 2 Myr. This period is well within observational limits. If improvements in stellar velocity dispersion studies continue, it is possible that a sufficiently accurate determination of the Solar oscillation period can be found to unambiguously answer the following questions. Is the Solar oscillation cycle correlated with the time series of ages for large craters? If so, can we reject the hypothesis that the correlation is an artifact that could likely be reproduced by a random distribution of ages? We present evidence which suggests that if it is found that the data requires a plane crossing period in the range 36 ± 2 Myr, the answer to both of these questions will be affirmative.

Type
II. Joint Discussions
Information
Highlights of Astronomy , Volume 11 , Issue 1: Highlights of Astronomy. As presented at the XXIIIrd General Assembly of the IAU (Part A), 1997 , 1998 , pp. 252 - 256
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1998

References

Flynn, C. and Fuchs, B. 1994. Density of Matter in the Galactic Disc. MNRAS 270, 471–479.Google Scholar
Grieve, R.A.F. and Pesonen, L.J. 1996. Terrestrial Impact Craters: Their Spatial and Temporal Distribution and Impacting Bodies. Worlds in Interaction: Small Bodies and Planets of the Solar System (Rickman, H. and Valtonen, M.J., Eds.), 357–376. Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Heisler, J. 1990. Monte Carlo Simulations of the Oort Comet Cloud. Icarus 88, 104–121.Google Scholar
Heisler, J. and Tremarne, S. 1989. How Dating Uncertainties Affect the Detection of Periodicity in Extinctions and Craters. Icarus 77, 213–219.Google Scholar
Matese, J.J., Whitman, P.G., Innanen, K.A. and Valtonen, M.J. 1995. Periodic Modulation of the Oort Cloud Comet Flux by the Adiabatically Changing Galactic Tide. Icarus 116, 255–268.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, M. and Kubotani, H.. A Statistical Test for Correlation Between Crater Formation Rate and Mass Extinctions. MNRAS 282, 1407–1412.Google Scholar
Rampino, M.R., and Stothers, R.B. 1986. Geological Periodicities and the Galaxy. The Galaxy and the Solar System (Smoluchowski, R., Bahcall, J.N. and Matthews, M.S., Eds), 241–260. Univ. of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Rampino, M.R., and Haggerty, B.M. 1996. The “Shiva Hypothesis”: Impacts, Mass Extinctions and the Galaxy. Worlds in Interaction: Small Bodies and Planets of the Solar System (Rickman, H. and Valtonen, M.J., Eds.), 441–460. Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Rampino, M.R., Haggerty, B.M. and Pagano, T.C. 1997. A Unified Theory of Impact Crises and Mass Extinctions: Quantitative Tests. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (J.L. Remo Ed.) 822 403–431.Google Scholar
Thaddeus, P. 1986. Molecular Clouds and Periodic Events in the Geologic Past. The Galaxy and the Solar System (Smoluchowski, R., Bahcall, J.N. and Matthews, M.S., Eds.), 61–68. Univ. of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Shoemaker, E.M., Wolfe, R.F. and Shoemaker, C.S.. 1990. Asteroid and Comet Flux in the Neighborhood of the Earth. Geological Society of America Special Paper 247, 155–170.Google Scholar