Last updated 10th July 2024: Online ordering is currently unavailable due to technical issues. We apologise for any delays responding to customers while we resolve this. For further updates please visit our website https://www.cambridge.org/news-and-insights/technical-incident
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 May 2015
In 1883 and early 1884 the controversial commemoration of the four-hundredth birthday of Martin Luther, celebrated in Germany and worldwide, captured much British public attention. The examination of this celebration offered here will improve current understanding of late Victorian religious controversies and indicate their continuing centrality to a range of cultural and historical debates in the period. The commemoration invigorated historic antagonisms in the British religious landscape, yet it also did far more than this. The commemoration provided a platform for those who wanted to foster Protestant unity in the face of what was widely perceived to be a revived threat from ‘popery’ and religious indifference at home and abroad. Whereas some religious and not-very-religious commentators, often belonging to a younger generation, wanted closely to associate Luther's world-historical role with liberalizing intellectual and social progress, others – sceptics, Catholics, high Anglicans, older Protestants – resisted this. Arguments about Luther's life and teaching often became more broadly Victorian discussions of the family, Anglo-German affinities or antagonisms, and the nature of modernity. By relating themes in the study of modern religious history to current concerns in the history of historical writing, this article will point to wider lacunae in scholarly approaches to nineteenth-century culture.
I am grateful to Jane Garnett, Brian Young, and the Historical Journal's anonymous readers for their comments on earlier versions of this article.
1 Bury and Norwich Post, and Suffolk Herald, 13 Nov. 1883, p. 4.
2 Bullen, George, British Museum: Luther exhibition, 1883, in the Grenville Library (2nd edn, London, 1883)Google Scholar.
3 Times, 12 Nov. 1883, p. 10; Aberdeen Weekly Journal, 17 Nov. 1883, p. 6; Royal Cornwall Gazette, Falmouth Packet, Cornish Weekly News, & General Advertiser, 2 Nov. 1883, p. 4.
4 For parallels in Judaism and Islam, see A. Green, ‘Old networks, new connections: the emergence of the Jewish international’, and Robinson, F., ‘The Islamic world: world system to “religious international”’, in Green, A. and Viaene, V., eds., Religious internationals in the modern world: globalization and faith communities since 1750 (Basingstoke, 2012), pp. 53–81Google Scholar, 111–35.
5 Lehmann, H., ‘Das Lutherjubiläum 1883’, in Becker, J., ed., Luthers bleibende Bedeutung (Husum, 1983), p. 93Google Scholar.
6 Manchester Guardian, 8 Aug. 1883, p. 5. Mitterauer, M., ‘Anniversarium und Jubiläum: Zur Entstehung und Entwicklung öffentlicher Gedenktage’, in Brix, E. and Stekl, H., eds., Der Kampf um das Gedächtnis: Öffentliche Gedenktage in Mitteleuropa (Vienna, Cologne, and Weimar, 1997), pp. 53–9Google Scholar, discusses Reformation and post-Reformation Luther celebrations.
7 Guardian, 19 Sept. 1883, p. 1370.
8 Lt. Fletcher Luther, RN, and his uncle, one Dr Luther of Belfast: Daily News, 13 Sept. 1883, p. 5.
9 J. Stalker, ‘The Luther festival at Wittenberg’, Free Church Monthly and Missionary Record, 24 (n.s.) (1 Nov. 1883), pp. 325–6.
10 Times, 12 Nov. 1883, p. 5.
11 Lehmann, ‘Lutherjubiläum’, pp. 93–116; Ritschl, A., Festrede am vierten Seculartage der Geburt Martin Luthers (Göttingen, 1883)Google Scholar.
12 On the importance of historical engagement to the elaboration of political, social, educational, and architectural argument in the nineteenth century, see Burrow, J. W., A liberal descent: Victorian historians and the English past (Cambridge, 1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Evans, R. J. W. and Marchal, G. P., eds., The uses of the middle ages in modern European states: history, nationhood and the search for origins (Basingstoke, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Turner, F. M., The Greek heritage in Victorian Britain (New Haven, CT, and London, 1981)Google Scholar; Crook, J. Mordaunt, The dilemma of style: architectural ideas from the picturesque to the post-modern (London, 1987)Google Scholar; and, more theoretically, Fritzsche, P. H., Stranded in the present: modern time and the melancholy of history (Cambridge, MA, 2004)Google Scholar. On religion and nineteenth-century historiography, see Forbes, D., The liberal Anglican idea of history (Cambridge, 1952)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; O'Day, R., The debate on the English Reformation (London, 1986)Google Scholar; Nixon, M., Samuel Rawson Gardiner and the idea of history (Woodbridge, 2010)Google Scholar; Dickens, A. G. and Tonkin, J., The Reformation in historical thought (Oxford, 1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, although the most wide-ranging of these studies, attends to a succession of major works without paying sufficient attention to the complex discursive environments in which those texts were composed; ‘historical thought’ may be a richer seam than ‘historiography’: Pocock, J. G. A., Political thought and history: essays on theory and method (Cambridge, 2009), pp. 24–5Google Scholar. An excellent collection of essays on broader nineteenth-century engagements with the Reformation has recently appeared: Nockles, P. and Westbrook, V., eds., Reinventing the Reformation in the nineteenth century: a cultural history, Bulletin of the John Rylands Library, 90 (2014)Google Scholar; it gives relatively more attention to earlier controversies than to the distinctive focal points of late Victorian debate, however. On the continuing, or reviving, importance of religious questions in framing politics, society, and intellectual life in nineteenth-century Britain, see Hilton, B., The age of atonement: the influence of evangelicalism on social and economic thought, 1795–1865 (Oxford, 1988)Google Scholar; Wolffe, J., The Protestant crusade in Great Britain, 1829–1860 (Oxford, 1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and idem, God and greater Britain: religion and national life in Britain and Ireland, 1843–1945 (London, 1994)Google Scholar; Turner, F. M., Contesting cultural authority: essays in Victorian intellectual life (Cambridge, 1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Paz, D. G., Popular anti-Catholicism in mid-Victorian England (Stanford, CA, 1992)Google Scholar; Bebbington, D. W., The dominance of evangelicalism: the age of Spurgeon and Moody (Leicester, 2005)Google Scholar; Wheeler, M., The old enemies: Catholic and Protestant in nineteenth-century English culture (Cambridge, 2006)Google Scholar. For a critical appraisal of the current plausibility of ‘the secularization thesis’, see Clark, J. C. D., ‘Secularization and modernization: the failure of a “grand narrative”’, Historical Journal, 55 (2012), pp. 161–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
13 Clark, C. and Kaiser, W., eds., Culture wars: secular–Catholic conflict in nineteenth-century Europe (Cambridge, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Gross, M. B., The war against Catholicism: liberalism and the anti-Catholic imagination in nineteenth-century Germany (Ann Arbor, MI, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Wheeler, The old enemies.
14 For more detailed accounts of the significance of arguments over German history, and the practice of history, in the context of unification and afterwards, see Smith, H. W., German nationalism and religious conflict: culture, ideology, politics, 1870–1914 (Princeton, NJ, 1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For coverage of Janssen, see Marchal, G. P., ‘Zwischen “Geschichtsbaumeistern” und “Römlingen”: Katholische Historiker und die Nationalgeschichtsschreibung in Deutschland und in der Schweiz’, in Graetz, M. and Mattioli, A., eds., Krisenwahrnehmungen im Fin de Siècle: jüdische und katholische Bildungseliten in Deutschland und der Schweiz (Zurich, 1997), pp. 177–210Google Scholar; Bennette, R. A., Fighting for the soul of Germany: the Catholic struggle for inclusion after unification (Cambridge, MA, and London, 2012), pp. 8–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 22–4, 96–7.
15 Alexandre, P., ‘Les fêtes commemoratives de Luther 1817–1846–1883–1917’, in Samuel-Scheyder, M., ed., Martin Luther: images, appropriations, relectures (Nancy, 1995), pp. 167–90Google Scholar.
16 Janssen, J., Geschichte des deutschen Volkes seit dem Ausgang des Mittelalters (8 vols., Freiburg im Breisgau, 1876–94)Google Scholar; Janssen, J., An meine Kritiker: Nebst Ergänzungen und Erläuterungen zu den drei ersten Bänden meiner Geschichte des deutschen Volkes (2 vols., Freiburg im Breisgau, 1883)Google Scholar; against Janssen, Köstlin, J., Luther und J. Janssen, der deutsche Reformator und ein ultramontaner Historiker (3rd edn, Halle, 1883)Google Scholar.
17 Köstlin, J., Martin Luther: sein Leben und seine Schriften (2nd edn, 2 vols., Elberfeld, 1883)Google Scholar; idem, Martin Luther, der deutsche Reformator (Halle, 1884)Google Scholar; idem., Luthers Leben (3rd edn, Leipzig, 1883)Google Scholar.
18 [Pearson, K.], ‘Martin Luther: his influence on the material and intellectual welfare of Germany’, Westminster Review, 121:241 (Jan. 1884), pp. 1–41Google Scholar; Froude, J. A., Luther: a short biography (London, 1883)Google Scholar.
19 I add a note on my use of the word ‘evangelical’. Here, it refers to that vein of British religion delineated most helpfully by Bebbington, Dominance of evangelicalism, pp. 19–36. This was characterized by an emphasis on spreading the Bible, the Cross as the means of redemption, personal conversion, and activism. In Germany, the word evangelisch had a more institutional than pietistic flavour, so to avoid confusion I use the term ‘Protestant’ in the German context. See Hope, N., German and Scandinavian, Protestantism 1700–1918 (Oxford, 1995), pp. 9–10Google Scholar, 497.
20 Heimann, M., ‘Catholic revivalism in worship and devotion’, in Gilley, S. and Stanley, B., eds., The Cambridge history of Christianity: world Christianities c. 1815–c. 1914 (Cambridge, 2006), pp. 70–83Google Scholar.
21 For example, Tilmans, K., Vree, F. van, and Winter, J. M., eds., Performing the past: memory, history, and identity in modern Europe (Amsterdam, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. On religion specifically, see Kennedy, J. C., ‘Religion, nation and European representations of the past’, in Berger, S. and Lorenz, C., eds., The contested nation: ethnicity, class, religion and gender in national histories (Basingstoke, 2008), pp. 104–34Google Scholar; Mitterauer, ‘Anniversarium und Jubiläum’, pp. 23–89, 67–8. On the popular ‘culture of the past’ in the Victorian period, see Melman, B., The culture of history: English uses of the past, 1800–1953 (Oxford, 2006)Google Scholar.
22 Symonds, J. A., Renaissance in Italy (7 vols., London, 1875–86)Google Scholar; Lecky, W. E. H., History of the rise and influence of the spirit of rationalism in Europe (2 vols., London, 1865)Google Scholar; Burrow, Liberal descent.
23 Morris, J., ‘Secularization and religious experience: arguments in the historiography of modern British religion’, Historical Journal, 55 (2012), pp. 204–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
24 Chadwick, O., From Bossuet to Newman (2nd edn, Cambridge, 1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Wolf, H., Burkard, D., and Muhlack, U., Rankes ‘Päpste’ auf dem Index: Dogma und Historie im Widerstreit (Paderborn, 2003)Google Scholar; Hinchliff, P., God and history: aspects of British theology, 1875–1914 (Oxford, 1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
25 J. Wolffe, ‘Cooper, Anthony Ashley-, seventh earl of Shaftesbury (1801–1885)’, Oxford dictionary of national biography (ODNB); M. Wellings, ‘Ryle, John Charles (1816–1900)’, ibid.; A. Clark, rev. H. C. G. Matthew, ‘Ince, William (1825–1910)’, ibid.
26 Green and Viaene, eds., Religious internationals; Railton, N. M., No North Sea: the Anglo-German evangelical network in the middle of the nineteenth century (Brill, 2000)Google Scholar.
27 On nineteenth-century Anglo-German cultural transfer, see Ledger-Lomas, M., ‘Lyra Germanica: German sacred music in mid-Victorian England’, German Historical Institute London Bulletin, 29 (2007), pp. 8–42Google Scholar.
28 Record, 21 Sept. 1883, p. 933.
29 Wolffe, Protestant crusade, pp. 198–210.
30 Record, 16 Nov. 1883, pp. 1143–4.
31 Record, 16 Nov. 1883, p. 1138.
32 Record, 2 Nov. 1883, p. 1104.
33 Ince, W., The Luther commemoration and the Church of England: a sermon preached before the University of Oxford on Sunday, November 11, 1883 (London, 1883), p. 27Google Scholar.
34 Ibid., pp. 4–7, 24–7. On comparable stirrings during the eighteenth century, see Young, B. W., ‘A history of variations: the identity of the eighteenth-century Church of England’, in Claydon, T. and McBride, I., eds., Protestantism and national identity: Britain and Ireland, c. 1650 – c. 1850 (Cambridge, 1998), pp. 105–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
35 British evangelicals had been encouraged in their ambitions for international alliance by the Swiss Reformation historian, J. H. Merle d'Aubigné. The 1846 formation of the Evangelical Alliance, the first major expression of this movement, gained much support in North America and on the continent: Railton, No North Sea, pp. xi–xxi, 32–8.
36 Record, 16 Nov. 1883, pp. 1145–6; M. Greschat, ‘Adolf Stoecker und der deutsche Protestantismus’, in Brakelmann, G., Greschat, M., and Jochmann, W., Protestantismus und Politik: Werk und Wirkung Adolf Stoeckers (Hamburg, 1982), pp. 19–83Google Scholar.
37 Liverpool Mercury and Lancashire, Cheshire and General Advertiser, 26 Oct. 1883, p. 1.
38 Record, 16 Nov. 1883, p. 1143.
39 Ibid., p. 1145; J. S. Reynolds, ‘Blackwood, Stevenson (1832–1893)’, ODNB.
40 Bentley, J., Ritualism and politics in Victorian Britain: the attempt to legislate for belief (Oxford, 1978)Google Scholar.
41 Record, 16 Nov. 1883, p. 1145.
42 Bristol Mercury and Daily Post, 17 Nov. 1883, p. 8.
43 Froude, Luther, pp. 27, 59; Garnett, J., ‘Protestant histories: James Anthony Froude, partisanship and national identity’, in Ghosh, P. and Goldman, L., eds., Politics and culture in Victorian Britain (Oxford, 2006), pp. 171–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
44 Köstlin was careful to explain the Catholic justification for the sale of indulgences, and stressed the affinities between Lutherans and (better) Catholics at the Diet of Ratisbon in 1541: Luthers Leben, pp. 91–2, 551–4. The corresponding passages may be found in English in the translation published by Longmans for the anniversary: Life of Luther (London, 1883), pp. 83–4Google Scholar, 512–16.
45 Belfast News-Letter, 12 Nov. 1883, p. 7; Freeman's Journal and Daily Commercial Advertiser, 12 Nov. 1883, p. 3.
46 Glasgow Herald, 13 Nov. 1883, p. 5; D. C. Smith, ‘Lang, John Marshall (1834–1909)’, ODNB.
47 Record, 16 Nov. 1883, p. 1150; Wolffe, Protestant crusade, pp. 195–6.
48 Record, 9 Nov. 1883, p. 1120.
49 Record, 16 Nov. 1883, pp. 1150–1; Aberdeen Weekly Journal, 17 Nov. 1883, p. 6.
50 Times, 12 Nov. 1883, p. 10.
51 E. Whately, ‘Infallibility’, Churchman, 9 (Dec. 1883), p. 197; Churchman, 9 (Nov. 1883), p. 160n.
52 For example, Family Churchman, 7 Nov. 1883, p. 513; Dowding, W. C., Luther and his work: notes of a sermon preached at St. Thomas's, Scarborough (London, 1883)Google Scholar; Quarterman, J. K., Sermons on ‘Martin Luther’ (Woolwich, 1884)Google Scholar; Maturin, B., The English Reformation, and its blessings to the nation, in connection with the work of Luther (London, 1883?)Google Scholar; Wright, C. H. H., ‘Martin Luther, the hero of the Reformation’, British and Foreign Evangelical Review, 33:127 (Jan. 1884), pp. 1–41Google Scholar; G. H. P., Anecdotes of Luther and the Reformation (London, 1883), pp. 255–6Google Scholar. Compare Thomas Carlyle on Luther in his On heroes, hero-worship & the heroic in history (London, 1841), pp. 186–248Google Scholar. One Mr Selkirk of the Aberdeen Free Presbytery was critical of the potentially idolatrous level of attention heaped upon one man: Aberdeen Weekly Journal, 10 Nov. 1883, p. 7.
53 Record, 16 Nov. 1883, p. 1139.
54 Law, H., The Reformation: its heroes and truths (London and Gloucester, 1883), pp. 37–48Google Scholar; Record, 28 Nov. 1884, p. 1190; J. R. Washbourn, rev. S. Gregory, ‘Law, Henry (1797–1884)’, ODNB.
55 Wylie, J. A., Luther: or the Reformation worked out in the person of Luther before being worked out on the stage of Christendom (London and Edinburgh, 1883), pp. 6–7Google Scholar, 18–19; compare his earlier History of Protestantism (3 vols., London, Paris and New York, NY, 1874)Google Scholar, iii, pp. 463–5; L. A. Ritchie, ‘Wylie, James Aitken (1808–1890)’, ODNB.
56 Bradstock, A., ‘“A man of God is a manly man”: Spurgeon, Luther and “holy boldness”’, in Bradstock, A., Gill, S., Hogan, A., and Morgan, S., eds., Masculinity and spirituality in Victorian culture (London and Basingstoke, 2000), pp. 209–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
57 Family Churchman, 21 Nov. 1883, p. 547; N. Vance, ‘Farrar, Frederic William (1831–1903)’, ODNB.
58 Record, 16 Nov. 1883, p. 1143; Mayor, J. E. B., Luther and good works (Cambridge, 1883), pp. 17–18Google Scholar.
59 Gross, War against Catholicism, pp. 185–239.
60 Stoughton, J., Homes and haunts of Luther (new edn, London, 1883), p. 242Google Scholar; J. M. Rigg, rev. H. C. G. Matthew, ‘Stoughton, John (1807–1897)’, ODNB.
61 As noted by W. Kaiser, ‘“Clericalism – that is our enemy!”: European anticlericalism and the culture wars’, and J. P. Parry, ‘Nonconformity, clericalism and “Englishness”: the United Kingdom’, in Clark and Kaiser, eds., Culture wars, pp. 47–76, 152–80. Fears of Romanizers, Ultramontanes, and the horrors of the confessional helped to drive the passage of the 1874 Public Worship Regulation Act and its subsequent enforcement: Bentley, Ritualism and politics, pp. 30–5, 75–9; M. Wellings, Evangelicals embattled: responses of evangelicals in the Church of England to ritualism, Darwinism and theological liberalism (Carlisle and Waynesboro, GA), pp. 40–51, 73–131.
62 Times, 14 Nov. 1883, p. 10.
63 Christie, J., Martin Luther: a lecture delivered upon the commemoration of the four hundredth anniversary of his birth (Carlisle, 1883), pp. 1–2Google Scholar; Froude, Luther, pp. 2–3.
64 Record, 16 Nov. 1883, p. 1141.
65 Record, 23 Nov. 1883, p. 1169; Times, 28 Nov. 1883, p. 5.
66 Kidd, C., The forging of races: race and scripture in the Protestant Atlantic world, 1600–2000 (Cambridge, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
67 [Anon.], Martin Luther: or, a reply to the 10th Nov., 1883 (London and New York, NY, 1884), pp. 16–19Google Scholar, 21–6.
68 See frontispiece to [Anon.], The real Martin Luther: the Reformer of Germany (London, 1883)Google Scholar.
69 William Thomson said that fourteen of the Thirty-Nine Articles were often taken word for word from the Lutheran Confessions of Augsburg and Wittenberg; John Mayor, professor of Latin at Cambridge, dwelled on this similarity in a sermon, as did the vicar of Lymington, Benjamin Maturin, in his commemoration tract: Record, 16 Nov. 1883, p. 1141; Mayor, Luther, pp. 10–11; Maturin, English Reformation, pp. 8–9.
70 [A. L. Moore], ‘Luther and the Luther commemoration’, Guardian, 7 Nov. 1883, pp. 1672–3; for attribution, see the reprint in idem, Lectures and papers on the history of the Reformation in England and on the continent (London, 1890), pp. 475–82Google Scholar; R. England, ‘Moore, Aubrey Lackington (1848–1890)’, ODNB.
71 Hare, J. C., Vindication of Luther against his recent English assailants (2nd edn, London, 1855)Google Scholar, and recommended by Savile, B. W., Martin Luther and the Reformation (London and Exeter, 1883), p. 39Google Scholar, William Thomson and the Record, 16 Nov. 1883, pp. 1141, 1149. Against Hare, J. B. Mozley, ‘Luther’, in idem, Essays historical and theological (2 vols., London, 1878)Google Scholar, i, p. 433, and commended by the Literary Churchman & Church Fortnightly, 23 Nov. 1883, p. 511, and Robert Eyton's letter to the Times, 10 Nov. 1883, p. 4. The Oxford Movement did not invent Anglican self-distancing from the continental Reformation, strands of which stretched back to the (first) period of the Counter-Reformation: Milton, A., Laudian and royalist polemic in seventeenth-century England: the career and writings of Peter Heylyn (Manchester, 2007), pp. 91–2Google Scholar.
72 Bentley, Ritualism and politics, pp. 23–4; for letter exchanges, York Herald, 20 Oct. 1883, p. 6, 27 Oct. 1883, p. 7; Times, 1 Nov. 1883, p. 8, 5 Nov. 1883, p. 4, 7 Nov. 1883, p. 10; Purey-Cust, A. P., The use and disuse of commemorations (London, 1883)Google Scholar.
73 Record, 16 Nov. 1883, pp. 1140–1.
74 Record, 16 Nov. 1883, p. 1149.
75 Church Times, 9 Nov. 1883, p. 813, 16 Nov. 1883, p. 827, 23 Nov. 1883, p. 851.
76 Oxford University Gazette, xiv (1883–4), 5 Nov. 1883, p. 85; Record, 16 Nov. 1883, p. 1147; compare Times, 12 Nov. 1883, p. 9.
77 Hutton, W. H., ed., Letters of William Stubbs: bishop of Oxford 1825–1901 (London, 1904), pp. 124–6Google Scholar. I am grateful to James Kirby for this reference.
78 Times, 22 Nov. 1883, p. 8.
79 Beard, C., The Reformation of the sixteenth century in its relation to modern thought and knowledge (London and Edinburgh, 1883)Google Scholar; Tulloch, J., Luther and other leaders of the Reformation (3rd edn, Edinburgh and London, 1883)Google Scholar; [J. Tulloch], ‘Augustus Neander’, British Quarterly Review, 24 (Nov. 1850), pp. 297–337; Oliphant, M., A memoir of the life of John Tulloch, D. D., LL.D. (3rd edn, Edinburgh, 1889), pp. 217–23Google Scholar, 424–5; A. Gordon, rev. R. K. Webb, ‘Beard, Charles (1827–1888)’, ODNB. For Scottish debates over the Westminster Confession in this period, see Drummond, A. L. and Bulloch, J., The church in late Victorian Scotland, 1874–1900 (Edinburgh, 1978)Google Scholar. In line with the approach of Beard and Tulloch, F. W. Farrar and Thomas Lindsay both credited the Reformation with establishing the principle that Scripture was to be read in its historical sense, challenging both the common evangelical belief in verbal inerrancy and the high church and Romanist deprecation of Luther as planting the seeds of later German rationalism: Farrar, F. W., ‘The Reformers as expositors. II. Luther’, Expositor, 7 (1884), pp. 214–29Google Scholar; Lindsay, T. M., The Reformation (2nd edn, Edinburgh, 1883), pp. 187–91Google Scholar.
80 A. R. Ropes, ‘Mr Beard's lectures on the Reformation’, Modern Review: A Quarterly Magazine (Oct. 1883), p. 756; J. Parker, rev. K. Chubbock, ‘Ropes, Arthur (1859–1933)’, ODNB.
81 Glasgow Herald, 13 Nov. 1883, p. 5; Lindsay, Reformation, p. vi; R. S. Rait, rev. J. Kirk, ‘Lindsay, Thomas (1843–1914)’, ODNB.
82 Lindsay, Reformation, pp. 171–6.
83 Ibid., pp. v–vi, 3, 169–70.
84 Birmingham Daily Post, 12 Nov. 1883, p. 5; Beard, C., Martin Luther and the Reformation in Germany until the close of the Diet of Worms, ed. Smith, J. Frederick (London, 1889)Google Scholar; Lindsay, T. M., Luther and the German Reformation (Edinburgh, 1900)Google Scholar; Creighton, M., A history of the papacy during the period of the Reformation (5 vols., London, 1882–94)Google Scholar.
85 Lindsay, Reformation, pp. 185–7, 194. Lindsay did not cite Ritschl, but did so in his later History of the Reformation (2nd edn, 2 vols., 1907–8), i, pp. 426–52. Ritschl's Rechtfertingung und Versöhnung, which also targeted Dorner, was available in English translation from 1872: Ritschl, A., A critical history of the Christian doctrine of justification and reconciliation, trans. Black, J. S. (Edinburgh, 1872), pp. 16–19Google Scholar; compare Dorner, I. A., History of Protestant theology particularly in Germany viewed according to its fundamental movement and in connection with the religious, moral, and intellectual life, trans. Robson, G. and Taylor, S. (2 vols., Edinburgh, 1871), i, pp. 220–62Google Scholar. On Ritschl and Dorner, see Pfleiderer, O., The development of theology in Germany since Kant, and its progress in Great Britain since 1825, trans. Smith, J. Frederick (London and New York, NY, 1890), pp. 154–61Google Scholar, 183–94, 373–4.
86 Creighton, M., Persecution and tolerance: being the Hulsean lectures preached before the University of Cambridge in 1893–1894 (London, 1895)Google Scholar, pp. 117–19.
87 J. Woiak, ‘Pearson, Karl [formerly Carl] (1857–1936)’, ODNB.
88 Athenaeum, 22 Sept. 1883, p. 368, 13 Oct. 1883, pp. 464–5, 27 Oct. 1883, pp. 530–1.
89 [Pearson], ‘Martin Luther’. The essay only alludes to Janssen, but he was certainly there: Porter, T. M., Karl Pearson: the scientific life in a statistical age (Princeton, NJ, and Oxford, 2004), pp. 91–105Google Scholar.
90 Girouard, M., Sweetness and light: the Queen Anne movement, 1860–1900 (Oxford, 1977)Google Scholar.
91 Observer, 11 Nov. 1883, p. 4.
92 Ropes, ‘Mr Beard's lectures’, pp. 762–3.
93 An interest that was not new: Roper, L., ‘Martin Luther's body: the “stout doctor” and his biographers’, American Historical Review, 115 (2010), pp. 351–84CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.
94 Record, 16 Nov. 1883, p. 1149.
95 Mozley, ‘Luther’, pp. 353–4; Stubbs, W., ‘The Reformation to the Diet of Augsburg, 1530’, in Hassall, A., ed., Lectures on European history (London, New York, NY, and Bombay, 1904)Google Scholar, p. 61; Literary Churchman & Church Fortnightly, 3 Aug. 1883, p. 325.
96 Athenaeum, 27 Oct. 1883, pp. 530–1.
