Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-pkt8n Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T05:49:28.111Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

PUBLIC RITUAL AND THE PROCLAMATION OF RICHARD CROMWELL AS LORD PROTECTOR IN ENGLISH TOWNS, SEPTEMBER 1658

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2017

AMY CALLADINE
AMY CALLADINE*
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
*
Department of History, Lenton Grove, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, ng7 2rdacaac4@exmail.nottingham.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The requirement to proclaim Richard Cromwell lord protector in September 1658 forced town leaders to engage with an unstable political context through the production of a large-scale public event. This article examines the ceremonies used in a range of provincial towns to offer a new perspective on urban culture in 1650s England. By analysing both contemporary print and the records of civic government, it reveals how urban inhabitants could maintain a variety of performative responses to state directive whilst approaching the moment of succession actively and pragmatically to confront issues specific to their respective locales. Crucially, there was no standard ritual experience and civic authorities remained relatively free to modify existing codes and apply them in the way/s that made most sense to their particular situation. In addition to confirming the essentially ambiguous nature of ceremonial expectation in this context, the findings presented in this article complicate our understanding of urban government during the last months of the protectorate by emphasizing the capacity for towns of varied religious and/or political complexion to use public ritual to further corporate interests and negotiate a range of specific concerns in both a national and a local framework.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 61 , Issue 1 , March 2018 , pp. 53 - 76
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

For generously giving their time to read various drafts of this article and for offering such insightful comments, I would like to thank Julia Merritt, Jason Peacey, James Mawdesley, and Daniel O'Neill, alongside the reviewers at the Historical Journal. I would also like to thank the Arts and Humanities Research Council for funding the doctoral study from which this research arose.

References

1 Peter Gaunt, ‘Cromwell, Richard (1626–1712)’, Oxford dictionary of national biography (ODNB); Little, Patrick and Smith, David L., Parliaments and politics during the Cromwellian protectorate (Cambridge, 2007), pp. 152–3Google Scholar; Coward, Barry, The Cromwellian protectorate (Manchester, 2002), p. 102Google Scholar; Fitzgibbons, Jonathan, ‘“Not in any doubtfull dispute”? Reassessing the nomination of Richard Cromwell’, Historical Research, 83 (2010), pp. 281–300, at p. 282CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Prestwich, John, Respublica, or a display of the honors, ceremonies & ensigns of the common-wealth, under the protectorship of Oliver Cromwell (London, 1787), pp. 204–7Google Scholar; Sharpe, Kevin, Image wars: promoting kings and commonwealths in England, 1603–1660 (London, 2010), p. 519Google Scholar.

3 Prestwich, Respublica, pp. 204–6.

4 Much scholarship here has been concerned with the extent of partisan allegiance and/or links to a broader ‘county community’ debate. For example, see Howell, Roger, Newcastle upon Tyne and the puritan revolution: a study of the Civil War in north England (Oxford, 1967)Google Scholar; idem, ‘Neutralism, conservatism and political alignment in the English revolution: the case of the towns, 1642–1649’, in Morrill, John, ed., Reactions to the English Civil War, 1642–1649 (London, 1982), pp. 67–87 Google Scholar; Styles, Philip, ‘The city of Worcester during the Civil Wars, 1640–1660’, in Richardson, R. C., ed., The English Civil Wars: local aspects (Stroud, 1997), pp. 187–238 Google Scholar; Patrick McGrath, ‘Bristol and the Civil War’, in Richardson, ed., The English Civil Wars, pp. 91–128; Scott, David, ‘Politics and government in York, 1640–1662’, in Richardson, R. C., ed., Town and countryside in the English revolution (Manchester, 1992), pp. 46–68 Google Scholar. For the latter point, see especially Everitt, Alan, The community of Kent and the great rebellion, 1640–1660 (Leicester, 1966)Google Scholar; Underdown, David, Somerset in the Civil War and Interregnum (Newton Abbot, 1973)Google Scholar; Morrill, John, Cheshire, 1630–1660: county government and society during the English revolution (Oxford, 1974)Google Scholar; Fletcher, Anthony, A county community in peace and war: Sussex, 1600–1660 (London, 1975)Google Scholar; Hughes, Ann, Politics, society and Civil War in Warwickshire, 1620–1660 (Cambridge, 1987)Google Scholar. Investigations into the impact of contextual disruption have not yet considered the particular role of public ritual in relation to the mechanics of urban government and negotiation of political instability.

5 Pertinent examples are Hutton, Ronald, The rise and fall of merry England: the ritual year, 1400–1700 (Oxford, 1994), pp. 212–26Google Scholar; Capp, Bernard, England's culture wars: puritan reformation and its enemies in the Interregnum, 1649–1660 (Oxford, 2012), pp. 110–31Google Scholar; Durston, Christoper and Maltby, Judith, eds., Religion in revolutionary England (Manchester, 2006)Google Scholar; Morrill, John, ‘The puritan revolution’, in Coffey, John and Lim, Paul Chang-Ha, eds., The Cambridge companion to puritanism (Cambridge, 2008), pp. 67–88 Google Scholar; Durston, Christopher, ‘Puritan rule and the failure of cultural revolution, 1645–1660’, in Durston, Christopher and Eales, Jacqueline, eds., The culture of English puritanism, 1560–1700 (Basingstoke, 1996), pp. 210–33Google Scholar.

6 Kelsey, Sean, Inventing a republic: the political culture of the English commonwealth, 1649–1653 (Manchester, 1997), pp. 53–84 Google Scholar; Knoppers, Laura Lunger, Constructing Cromwell: ceremony, portrait and print (Cambridge, 2000), pp. 69–106, 132–66Google Scholar; Sharpe, Image wars, pp. 445–52, 468–92, 512–25.

7 Kelsey, Inventing a republic, p. 54.

8 Ibid., pp. 59, 73, 85. This was achieved through an impressive catalogue of public occasions including the celebration of military victories and ship launching on the Thames.

9 Sharpe, Image wars, p. 387.

10 Knoppers, Constructing Cromwell, p. 136.

11 Gardiner, Samuel Rawlinson, History of the commonwealth and protectorate (4 vols., London, 1903), iii, p. 178Google Scholar; Sherwood, Roy, The court of Oliver Cromwell (London, 1977)Google Scholar; idem, Oliver Cromwell: king in all but name (Stroud, 1977)Google Scholar; Woolrych, Austin, Commonwealth to protectorate (Oxford, 1982), pp. 145, 360Google Scholar; Sharpe, Image wars, p. 517; Knoppers, Constructing Cromwell, p. 136.

12 Most obviously, the abolition of the episcopacy in 1646 and the House of Lords in 1649 altered the ‘imagery, mood and political content’ of state ceremonial which in turn became ‘much more secular, much less medieval’. For further discussion on this point, see Peacey, Jason, ‘The street theatre of state: the ceremonial opening of parliament, 1603–1660’, Parliamentary History, 34 (2015), pp. 155–72Google Scholar, at p. 167.

13 Coward, Cromwellian protectorate, p. 103.

14 Important studies for the earlier and later periods have been completed by Robert Tittler and Peter Borsay respectively. See Tittler, , The Reformation and the towns in England: politics and political culture, c. 1540–1640 (Oxford, 1998)Google Scholar; idem, Architecture and power: the town hall and the English urban community, c. 1500–1640 (Oxford, 1991)Google Scholar. With reference to the ‘long eighteenth century’, see Borsay, , The English urban renaissance: culture and society in the provincial town, 1660–1770 (Oxford, 1989)Google Scholar.

15 Withington, Phil, ‘Citizens, community and political culture in Restoration England’, in Shepard, Alexandra and Withington, Phil, eds., Communities in early modern England: networks, place, rhetoric (Manchester, 2000), pp. 135–6, 137, 152Google Scholar; Wilson, Kathleen, The sense of the people: politics, culture and imperialism in England, 1715–1785 (Cambridge, 1995)Google Scholar; Barry, Jonathan, ‘Bourgeois collectivism? Urban association and the middling sort’, in Barry, Jonathan and Brooks, Christopher Wilson, eds., The middling sort of people: culture, society and politics in England, 1550–1800 (London, 1994), pp. 109–12Google Scholar; Sweet, Rosemary, The writing of urban histories in eighteenth-century England (Oxford, 1997), pp. 74–100 CrossRefGoogle Scholar. In relation to the sixteenth century, Tittler has explored the realignment of civic elites with state government to preserve the control of a select urban oligarchy. See his Reformation and the towns. Barry has stressed the existence of an urban culture of association which provided a shared forum of values and practices for (a select group of) local residents. See his ‘Bourgeois collectivism?’, pp. 84–113; idem, ‘Bristol pride: civic identity in Bristol, c. 1640–1775’, in Dresser, Madge and Ollerenshaw, Philip, eds., The making of modern Bristol (Tiverton, 1996), p. 25Google Scholar.

16 Withington, Phil, ‘Views from the bridge: revolution and restoration in seventeenth-century York’, Past and Present, 170 (2001), pp. 121–51, at p. 135Google Scholar; Roy, Ian, ‘The English republic, 1649–1660: the view from the town hall’, in Schriften des historischen kollegs kolloquien II. republiken und republikanismus im Europa dem frühen neuzeit (Oldenburg, 1985), pp. 234–7Google Scholar; Ann Hughes, ‘Coventry and the English revolution’, in Richardson, ed., Town and countryside, p. 89.

17 Withington, ‘Views from the bridge’, p. 141; Roy, ‘English republic’, p. 214.

18 Barry has outlined how, from the mid-seventeenth century, the state began to increase its presence in urban centres through ‘tax officials and military men’. See his ‘Provincial town culture, 1640–1680: urbane or civic?’, in Pittock, J. H. and Wear, A., eds., Interpretation and cultural history (London, 1991), p. 204Google Scholar. Moreover, many towns faced ‘legal and political chaos’ following the granting of new charters and extensive removals and appointments of corporate members. For further discussion on this point, see Halliday, Paul, Dismembering the body politic: partisan politics in England's towns, 1650–1730 (Cambridge, 1998), pp. 62–3, 65CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

19 Smith, David Lawrence, ‘English politics in the 1650s’, in Braddick, Michael J., ed., The Oxford handbook of the English revolution (Oxford, 2015), pp. 196–7Google Scholar; Durston, Christopher, ‘The fall of Cromwell's major-generals’, English Historical Review, 113 (1998), pp. 18–37, at pp. 29, 36CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hutton, Ronald, The British republic, 1649–1660 (Basingstoke, 1990), pp. 72–5Google Scholar; Sharpe, Image wars, p. 531; idem, The Restoration: a political and religious history of England and Wales, 1658–1667 (Oxford, 1985), p. 18Google Scholar.

20 Gaunt, ‘Cromwell, Richard’, ODNB.

21 ‘Justice's note-book of Capt. John Pickering, 1656–1660’, ed. Lumb, G. D., Publications of the Thoresby Society: Miscellanea, 15 (1909), pp. 71–80, 277–95, at pp. 278–9Google Scholar.

22 Bodleian Library (Bodl.), Clarendon MS 58, fo. 288.

23 A collection of the state papers of John Thurloe, ed. Birch, T. (7 vols., London, 1742), vii, p. 374Google Scholar.

24 Prestwich, Respublica, pp. 204–6; Mercurius Politicus, 432 (2–9 Sept. 1658), p. 806.

25 Bodl., Clarendon MS 58, fo. 332.

26 Mercurius Politicus, 435 (23–30 Sept. 1658), pp. 885–6, 889–90.

27 Mercurius Politicus, 548 (30 Dec. – 6 Jan. 1658), pp. 132–4; Mercurius Politicus, 557 (3–10 Mar. 1659), pp. 276–7.

28 Mercurius Politicus, 546 (16–23 Dec. 1658), pp. 82–3.

29 Knoppers, Constructing Cromwell, p. 137.

30 Peacey, Jason, Politicians and pamphleteers: propaganda during the English Civil Wars and Interregnum (Aldershot, 2004), pp. 195, 228–30Google Scholar.

31 Knoppers, Constructing Cromwell, p. 137.

32 A true catalogue, or, an account of the several places and most eminent persons in the three nations, and elsewhere where, and by whom Richard Cromwell was proclaimed lord protector of the commonwealth of England, Scotland, and Ireland (1659), p. 53.

33 Sharpe, Image wars, p. 532.

34 For example, see Norfolk Record Office (NRO), NCR Case 16d/6, fos. 195v–196r; Gloucestershire Archives (GA), GBR/H/2/3, fos. 249–56; Stocks, Helen, ed., Records of the borough of Leicester being a series of extracts from the archives of the corporation of Leicester, 1603–1688 (Cambridge, 1923), pp. 451–2Google Scholar; Cruden, R. P., The history of the town of Gravesend in the county of Kent and the port of London (London, 1843), p. 321Google Scholar; Druery, J. H., Historical and topographical notices of Great Yarmouth (London, 1826), p. 328Google Scholar.

35 Sharpe, Image wars, p. 532.

36 See discussion of Sir Thomas Widdrington in York below. See also D. Scott, ‘Widdrington, Sir Thomas (c. 1600–1664)’, ODNB; Public Intelligencer, 142 (6–13 Sept. 1658), pp. 813–14.

37 Chester County Archives and Local Studies, P 1/11, no fo. numbers. Holy Trinity churchwardens’ accounts, 1661 for 1658.

38 Forster, Gordon Colin Fawcett, ‘Civic government in Chester, 1642–1660’, Northern History, 37 (2000), pp. 83–103, at p. 102CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

39 R. N. Dore has emphasized that Chester was fairly committed to royalism from 1642, a factor that would naturally help to explain the reluctance of the corporation to commemorate the proclamation of Oliver Cromwell's son. Dore's argument challenges that of A. M. Johnson who maintained that the town would have demonstrated more of a neutral position if it was not for a coup led by a select body of royalist councillors. For further discussion on this point, see Dore, R. N., ‘1642: the coming of the Civil War to Cheshire: conflicting actions and impressions’, Transactions of the Lancashire and Cheshire Antiquarian Society, 87 (1991), pp. 39–63 Google Scholar; Johnson, A. M., ‘Politics in Chester during the Civil Wars and Interregnum’, in Clark, Peter and Slack, Paul, eds., Crisis and order in English towns, 1500–1700 (London, 1972), pp. 204–36Google Scholar.

40 Capp, Culture wars, pp. 224–5.

41 Johnson, ‘Politics in Chester’, pp. 220–8; Lewis, C. P. and Thacker, A. T., eds., The Victoria county history of Cheshire: the city of Chester, general history and topography (London, 2003), pp. 121, 123Google Scholar.

42 Indeed, a standard formal address was sent to the lord protector from ‘several Justices of the Peace, Gentlemen, Ministers, and many of the Freeholders, of the county of Chester’ in February 1659. See Mercurius Politicus, 555 (17–24 Feb. 1659), pp. 443–4.

43 Clark, Peter, ‘The Ramoth-Gilead of the good: urban change and political radicalism at Gloucester, 1540–1640’, in Barry, Jonathan, ed., The Tudor and Stuart town: a reader in English urban history, 1530–1688 (Harlow, 1990), p. 270Google Scholar; Langston, J. N., ‘John Workman, puritan lecturer in Gloucester’, Transactions of the Bristol and Gloucestershire Archaeological Society, 66 (1947 for 1945), pp. 219–32, at pp. 220–1Google Scholar; Roy, ‘English republic’, pp. 216, 231.

44 Capp, Culture wars, pp. 234–6; Warmington, Andrew Richard, Civil War, Interregnum and Restoration in Gloucestershire, 1640–1672 (Woodbridge, 1997), pp. 100, 103–4Google Scholar.

45 Warmington, Gloucestershire, p. 105; Historical Manuscripts Commission (HMC), The records of the corporation of Gloucester (London, 1891), pp. 505, 507, 514–15Google Scholar.

46 Warmington, Gloucestershire, pp. 9, 13; Herbert, N. M., ed., The Victoria county history of Gloucestershire: the city of Gloucester (Oxford, 1988), pp. 87–8Google Scholar.

47 GA, GBR/F4/6, fos. 193–4.

48 Ibid., fo. 264.

49 Ibid., fo. 194.

50 Gloucester had been degarrisoned in 1653 following a period of tension between civic and soldierly factions in the town. Warmington, Gloucestershire, p. 105; HMC, Gloucester, pp. 502–4, 509–10, 515–16.

51 Warmington, Gloucestershire, p. 126; GA, GBR B3/3, fos. 87–8, 90–1.

52 Capp, Culture wars, pp. 240–2.

53 A Perfect Diurnall, 13 (4–11 Mar. 1650), pp. 109–10.

54 Mercurius Politicus, 433 (9–16 Sept. 1658), pp. 817–18; State papers of John Thurloe, ed. Birch, vii, pp. 377–8.

55 Capp, Culture wars, p. 251.

56 Ibid., p. 246.

57 State papers of John Thurloe, ed. Birch, vii, pp. 377–8.

58 Hobson, M. G. and Salter, H. E., eds., Oxford council acts, 1626–1665 (Oxford, 1933), p. 441Google Scholar; The life and times of Anthony Wood, antiquary, of Oxford, 1632–1696, described by himself, ed. Clark, A. (4 vols., Oxford, 1891–5), i, p. 259Google Scholar.

59 Life and times of Anthony Wood, ed. Clark, i, p. 259.

60 Hobson and Salter, eds., Oxford council acts, p. 441.

61 For further discussion on the capacity for public ritual to engender conflict over the use of urban space, see Withington, Phil, ‘Citizens, soldiers and urban culture in Restoration England’, English Historical Review, 123 (2008), pp. 587–610 Google Scholar; Barry, Johnathan, ‘Communicating with authority: the uses of script, print and speech in Bristol 1640–1714’, in Crick, Julia C. and Walsham, Alexandra, eds., The uses of script and print, 1300–1700 (Cambridge, 2004), pp. 202, 204Google Scholar.

62 Capp, Culture wars, p. 49.

63 Mackenzie, Eneas, Historical account of Newcastle upon Tyne including the borough of Gateshead (2 vols., Newcastle upon Tyne, 1827), i, p. 40Google Scholar.

64 State papers of John Thurloe, ed. Birch, vi, p. 284.

65 MacKenzie, Newcastle, p. 41; Roger Howell, ‘Newcastle and the nation: the seventeenth-century experience’, in Barry, ed., The Tudor and Stuart town, pp. 285–6.

66 State papers of John Thurloe, ed. Birch, vii, p. 377.

67 The Publick Intelligencer, 143 (13–20 Sept. 1658), p. 826.

68 State papers of John Thurloe, ed. Birch, vii, p. 377.

69 Archer, Ian, ‘Politics and government, 1540–1700’, in Clark, Peter, ed., The Cambridge urban history of Britain, ii: 1540–1840 (Cambridge, 2000), p. 254Google Scholar.

70 Roy, ‘English republic’, pp. 214–15, 234, 237.

71 For example, Gloucester petitioned parliament to make the former cathedral a parish church under city ownership. Coventry and Bristol pursued grants for parkland and to obtain special trading privileges. See Roberts, Stephen K., ‘Cromwellian towns in the Severn Basin: a contribution to cis-Atlantic history?’, in Little, Patrick, ed., The Cromwellian protectorate (Woodbridge, 2007), p. 180Google Scholar; idem, ‘State and society in the English revolution’, in Braddick, ed., The Oxford handbook of the English revolution, p. 307. For the classic work on corporate independence in this period, see Henderson, B. L. K., ‘The commonwealth charters’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 3rd ser., 6 (1912), pp. 129–62Google Scholar.

72 Withington, Phil, The politics of commonwealth: citizens and freemen in early modern England (Cambridge, 2005), pp. 5–7, 98Google Scholar.

73 Withington, ‘Citizens, soldiers and urban culture’, p. 609; idem, ‘Views from the bridge’, pp. 135, 140.

74 For example, see Clark, Peter and Slack, Paul, English towns in transition, 1500–1700 (London, 1976), p. 138Google Scholar.

75 Capp, Culture wars, p. 39; Withington, ‘Views from the bridge’, pp. 125–6, 133.

76 Scott, ‘Politics and government in York, 1640–1662’, pp. 50–9.

77 Scott, ‘Widdrington, Sir Thomas’, ODNB.

78 Public Intelligencer, 142 (6–13 Sept. 1658), pp. 813–14.

79 Ibid.

80 Mercurius Politicus, 436 (30 Sept. – 7 Oct. 1658), pp. 881–4.

81 State papers of John Thurloe, ed. Birch, vii, p. 376.

82 Mercurius Politicus, 433 (9–16 Sept. 1658), pp. 831–2.

83 Sandby, W., ed., The parliamentary or constitutional history of England (23 vols., London, 1751–61), xx, pp. 278–9Google Scholar.

84 Capp, Culture wars, p. 228; Withington, ‘Citizens, soldiers and urban culture’, pp. 590, 608.

85 State papers of John Thurloe, ed. Birch, vii, p. 455.

86 For further discussion on the position of the army in this context, see Reece, Henry, The army in Cromwellian England, 1649–1660 (Oxford, 2013), p. 192CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Smith, ‘English politics in the 1650s’, pp. 188, 196–7.

87 State papers of John Thurloe, ed. Birch, vii, p. 400.

88 Ibid., p. 376

89 The Publick Intelligencer, 143 (13–20 Sept. 1658), p. 827.

90 Ibid., p. 825.

91 State papers of John Thurloe, ed. Birch, vii, p. 385.

92 NRO, NCR Case 16a/23, fo. 84r.

93 The Publick Intelligencer, 143 (13–20 Sept. 1658), pp. 817–18.

94 Mercurius Politicus, 433 (9–16 Sept. 1658), p. 830.

95 Capp, Culture wars, p. 233. The town had a long history of problematic public ritual. It was one of the few places in the country to have marked the accession of Lady Jane Grey in 1553 and was subsequently sued by the Marian regime, eventually receiving royal pardon for its misdemeanour. Nichols, John Gough, ed., The chronicle of Queen Jane, and of two years of Queen Mary (London, 1801), pp. 110–14Google Scholar; Beer, Barrett L., Rebellion and riot: popular disorder in England during the reign of Edward VI (Kent, OH, 2005), p. xxGoogle Scholar.

96 HMC, The manuscripts of the corporations of Southampton and King's Lynn (London, 1887), p. 183Google Scholar.

97 The Publick Intelligencer, 144 (20–7 Sept. 1658), p. 854.

98 Ibid.

99 HMC, Southampton and King's Lynn, p. 183.

100 Mercurius Politicus, 435 (23–30 Sept. 1658), pp. 889–90; Warmington, Gloucestershire, p. 126; GA, GBR B3/3, fos. 87–8, 90–1.

101 See, for example, Mercurius Politicus, 549 (6–13 Jan. 1659), pp. 155–6; Mercurius Politicus, 550 (13–20 Jan. 1659), pp. 171–2; Mercurius Politicus, 551 (20–7 Jan. 1658), pp. 186–7; Mercurius Politicus, 557 (3–10 Mar. 1659), pp. 276–7; Mercurius Politicus, 559 (17–24 Mar. 1659), pp. 308–9.

102 Abbott, Wilbur Cortez, ed., The writings and speeches of Oliver Cromwell (4 vols., Cambridge, MA, 1937–47), iv, p. 866Google Scholar; Jones, James Rees, ‘Booth's rising of 1659’, Bulletin of the John Rylands Library, 39 (1957), pp. 416–33Google Scholar, at p. 416; Everitt, Community of Kent, p. 302.

103 See, for example, Coward, Cromwellian protectorate, pp. 4–5; McMains, H. F., The death of Oliver Cromwell (Lexington, KY, 2000), p. 4Google Scholar; Aylmer, Gerald Edward, The Interregnum: the quest for settlement, 1646–1660 (London, 1972), p. 187CrossRefGoogle Scholar.