Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-20T17:56:41.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The ‘Three Glorious Days’: The Revolution of 1830 in Provincial France

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

Pamela Pilbeam
Affiliation:
Bedford College, University of London

Extract

France has always envied Paris. A popular interpretation of the history of France has been of conflict between the capital and the provinces in which Paris was the victor, at least from the establishment of the system of intendants by Louis XIV in the late seventeenth century. Radical Paris took the lead in the revolutionary upheavals of the 1790s, in 1830, 1848 and 1870–1. The conflict of the 1790s produced civil and foreign war and led to an even greater domination by Paris through the centralizing policies of Napoleon Bonaparte as military dictator. Under his rule and subsequently, all officials - civil, judicial, military, religious and educational - were appointed by the government in Paris. The Council of State was a corner-stone of this policy in the capital, the departmental prefect in the provinces. In 1830 the results of the July Days were acceptable on the whole to the French; but in 1848 provincial France roundly rejected the radical social revolution favoured by intellectuals and artisans in Paris; in 1871 the Commune of Paris was virtually isolated in its decentralizing and social-reforming ambitions and suffered bloody defeat at the hands of the regular army. Apparently, then, 1830 was the last, and perhaps only, time in the nineteenth century that ‘Paris led, France followed.’ Was 1830 so unique, and if so, why? The Revolution of 1830 was unquestionably Parisian, in that events in the capital determined the timing and location of acts of significant revolutionary violence and in that the major political and administrative changes which followed the revolution were enacted in Paris. Should one therefore assume that the provinces were passive, that they had little impact on events? This revolution may neatly illustrate the success with which Louis XIV, Napoleon and others had centralized France, but that conclusion needs to be based on evidence, not assumption. The most recent complete analysis of the revolution concentrated on Paris, but also delineated some aspects of provincial unrest in 1830, making use of the local studies written for the centenary of the revolution. Some provincial and departmental histories describe the events of 1830 and their local impact.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Pinkney, D., The French Revolution of 1830 (Princeton, 1972)Google Scholar; Revue d’histoire moderne, VI (1931)Google Scholar; Perreux, G., ‘L’esprit public dans les départements au lendemain de la Révolution de 1830’, Révolution de 1848, XXX (1933–4).Google Scholar

2 Contamine, H., Metz el Moselle de 1814 à 1870, 2 vols. (Nancy, 1932)Google Scholar; Cl.Fohlen, , Histoire de Besançon II (Paris, 1965)Google Scholar; Leuilliot, P., L’Alsace au début du XIXe siècle, 2 vols. (Paris, 1959–61)Google Scholar; Ribe, G., L’opinion publique et la vie politique à Lyon 1815–22 (Paris, 1957).Google Scholar

3 Pilbeam, P., ‘Popular violence in provincial France after the 1830 Revolution’, E.H.R. XCI (1976). Merriman, J. (ed.), 1830 in France (London, 1975).Google Scholar

4 Pilbeam, P., ‘The growth of liberalism and the crisis of the Bourbon Restoration, Historical Journal, XXIV (1981). I am grateful to the Central Research Fund, University of London, for grants which it has awarded me to work on local archives in France.Google Scholar

5 Moniteur Universel, 26 July 1830.

6 A[rchives] M[ationales], CC547.

7 Charles de Remusat the liberal journalist commented on the choice, ‘Il n’a encore pour lui ni la popularité, ni la puissance. C’est un avantage, car il ne peut prétendre à nous faire ses conditions,’ Remusat, C. de (ed. Ponthas, C. H.), Mémoires de ma vie (Paris, 1959), II, 350–1.Google Scholar

8 A sound brief account of the Paris revolt appears in Jardin, A. and Tudesq, A. J., La France des Notables 1815–48, I: Lévolution générale (Paris, 1973), 114–24.Google Scholar

9 Private diaries give a good impression of this confusion. The following were invaluable: Lebert, a designer for the textile manufacturer. Hartmann was part of the liberal elite of Alsace (Journal (B[ibliothèque] M[unicipale], Colmar)). N. Louet, a juge de paix in Bar sur Aube, gives a good account of his own department, full of dry humorous comments on the official world (A[rchives] D[épartementales] H[aute-]M[arne], série J). Maillard de Chambure, juge in cour royale, Dijon [Journal des événements politiques en Juillet 1830 (manuscript): a sympathizer with the Bourbons, he nonetheless took the oath to Louis-Philippe, BM, Dijon, Fonds Milsand C. Weiss, Journal de C. Weiss; a rather literary liberal, Weiss was librarian in Besançon during the July Monarchy; selections from his diary were published by E. Tavernier in Les Gaudes between 1908 and 1913.

10 Gendarmerie report Jura, 30 July 1830. AN, F74034.

11 Verronnais, Annuaire du département de la Moselle (1831), p. 93. BM, Metz.

12 N. Louet, 29 July 1830. ADHM, 2J401.

13 Louet, 2 August 1830, 2 J 401.

14 Verronais, Annuaire (1831), p. 92. BM, Metz.

15 Lebert, 28 July 1830. BM, Colmar.

16 Louet, 2 August 1830.

17 Gendarmerie report, Rhône, 29 July 1830. AN, F76771.

18 Maillard de Chambure, Journal, 28 July 1830. BM, Dijon, Journal de la Côte d’Or, 30 July 1830.

19 C. Weiss, Journal, 29 July 1830. BM, Besançon.

20 ‘Le préfet du Puy-de-Dôme aux habitants de Clermont’, 1 August 1830. AD, Puy-de-Dôme, MO147.

21 Prefect to maire of Chaumont, 31 July 1830. ADHM, 61M15.

22 C. Weiss, 5 August 1830.

23 The prefect of the Bas-Rhin continued to report frequently to Minister of Interior, 4–24 August 1830. AD, Bas-Rhin, 3M40.

24 Louet, 3 and 8 August 1830.

26 Order of Castex, general commanding 5th division, 1 August 1830, AD, Bas-Rhin, 3M40.

27 Supplement to Moniteur, 31 July 1830.

28 AM, Metz, 21 148, Affaire Terquem. Report of procureur général, Metz, to Garde des Sceaux, 31 August 1830, AN, BB18 1187.

29 Gendarmerie commander to provisional committee, 5 August 1830. AD, Puy-de-Dôme, M0147.

30 Lieutenant-general commanding 19th military division, Bachelu to Minister of War, 6 August 1830, AN, F76771.

31 Moniteur, 31 July 1830.

32 Maillard de Chambure, Journal, 1 August 1830, BM, Dijon.

33 Lebert, 1 August 1830, BM, Colmar.

34 Gendarmerie report for July 1830, AN, F73983. Charles Pichegru, a famous revolutionary general turned Royalist conspirator, was murdered while under interrogation in 1804. He became a hero in the Restoration (Biographie Universelle, 1823), XXXIV, 274–80).

35 Weiss, 2 and 7 August 1830.

36 Prefect Bas-Rhin to Minister of Interior, 28 August 1830, AD, Bas-Rhin, 3M40.

37 Gendarmerie report Jura, August 1830, AN, F74034.

38 29 July 1830, police report, AM, Metz, I D 36, gendarmerie report, Moselle, BB18 1186.

39 Lebert, Journal. By 1830 his Bonapartism was sentimental and historical, not practical.

40 Procureur général. Dijon, Garde des Sceaux, II Dec. 1822. AN, BB30 241.

41 Lebert, 2 August 1830.

42 Gendarmerie report, 6 August 1830. AN, F74144.

43 Verronnais, Annaire, 1831, p. 91.

44 A[rchives de ld] G[uerre] Vincennes; E5I.

45 Register of deliberations of municipal council, 24 August 1830. AM, Nancy.

46 Gendarmerie report Jura, August 1830, AN, F74034.

47 Commissaire de police, Nancy to prefect, 10 August 1830, AD, Meurthe, WM 2002.

48 Spectaeur, 5 August 1830. BM, Dijon.

49 Impartial, 2 August 1830. AD, Dijon.

50 St Amarin, Belfort report of thefts, 19 August 1830. AN, BB181186.

51 Gendarmerie report for July 1830, Haute Marne. AN, F74080.

52 Deliberations of municipal council, Chaumont, 2 August 1830. AM, Chaumont, série D.

53 Gendarmerie report, 6 August 1830. AN, F74144.

54 Lebert, 31 July and 2 August 1830.

55 Commissaire de police to prefect, AD, Meurthe, WM 2002.

56 Deliberations, municipal council Nancy, 2 August 1830. AM, Nancy.

57 M. Cohendy, Mémoire historique sur les modes successifs de l’administration dans la province de l’Auvergne (1856), p. 310.

58 AD, Puy-de-Dôme, M 0147.

59 AD, Puy-de-Dôme, M 0147.

60 Gendarmerie report, 6 August 1830. AN, F74144.

61 Reports from delegates, 9 August 1830. AD, Moselle, 58 MI.

62 Divisional military commander Lyon, to Minister of War, 6 August 1830. AN, F76771.

63 Petition from Rambervilliers, 7 August 1830, AN, C 2110. A substantial number of these petitions survive.

64 Petition from Langres, Haute-Marne, 26 August, AM, F1C 1 31 and one from Chaumont 23 August. AM, Chaumont, série D.