No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Women's Suffrage, Political Economy, and the Transatlantic Birth Strike Movement, 1911–1920
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 December 2022
Abstract
The first two decades of the twentieth century saw the development of a meaningful transnational movement to employ birth strikes in the fight for women's rights. In an Anglo-American context, this movement was intimately tied to the women's suffrage campaign. It was led by a network of suffragists, Neo-Malthusians, and birth control campaigners who shared literary and personal ties which allowed their ideas to criss-cross the Atlantic between 1911 and 1920. Although the transatlantic birth strike was never implemented on a significant scale, explaining its almost total absence within existing historiography, this article uses a gendered intellectual history framework to piece together the ideas behind the movement which, the article argues, disrupt established understanding of Neo-Malthusianism and socialist-feminism within intellectual histories. Support for birth striking was predicated on faith in the power of working-class collective action, scrutiny of the economic exploitation of both productive and ‘reproductive’ workers, and a corresponding mistrust in the efficacy of state involvement with these issues. The birth strikers wove together strands from collectivist, individualist, socialist, and feminist thought, undermining traditional historiographical depictions of binaries between socialism and suffragism and collectivism and individualism in early twentieth-century political thought.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press.
References
1 Ludwig Quessel, ‘Economics of the birth strike’, in Eden Paul and Cedar Paul, eds., Population and birth-control: a symposium (New York, NY, 1917), p. 149.
2 Ibid., p. 149.
3 Ibid., p. 150.
4 Ibid., p. 152.
5 Karen Offen, Debating the woman question in the Third Republic, 1870–1920 (Cambridge, 2018), p. 255; Lee, Sujin, of, ‘Differing conceptions “voluntary motherhood”: Yamakawa Kikue's birth strike and Ishimoto Shizue's eugenic feminism’, US–Japan Women's Journal, 52 (2017), pp. 3–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Neuman, Roderick, ‘Working-class birth control in Wilhelmine Germany’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 20 (1978), pp. 408–28CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed, at pp. 413–14.
6 Alfred Bernstein, Wie fördern wir den kulturellen Rückgang der Geburten? (Berlin, 1913). English title ‘How do we promote a culture of a declining birth rate?’. For details of the pamphlet's publication and sales, see D. Nelles, ‘Anarchosyndikalismus und Sexualreformbewegung in der Weimarer Republik’, written for the workshop Free love and the labour movement at the International Institute of Social History in Amsterdam (6 Oct. 2000), p. 2.
7 William J. Robinson, Sexual problems of today (New York, NY, 1921), p. 286.
8 For Sanger's and Goldman's contributions, see the third section of this article.
9 Robinson, William J., ‘The birth strike’, International Socialist Review, 14 (1914), pp. 404–6Google Scholar.
10 Fleeting references to the British birth strike movement appear in Lucy Bland, Banishing the beast: feminism, sex and morality (London, 2001; orig. edn 1995), p. 247; and Ann Taylor Allen, Feminism and motherhood in western Europe, 1890–1970 (Basingstoke, 2005), pp. 107–9. Slightly more extensive coverage of the American birth strike movement has come from Jill Richards, The Fury Archives: female citizenship, human rights, and the international avant-gardes (New York, NY, 2020), pp. 105–43. However, Richards does not explore birth striking as a suffrage tactic.
11 A. V. Dicey, Lectures on the relation between law and public opinion in England during the nineteenth century (London, 1905).
12 Brebner, J. B., ‘Laissez-faire and state intervention in nineteenth-century Britain’, Journal of Economic History, 8 (1948), pp. 59–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Perkin, Harold, ‘Individualism versus collectivism in nineteenth-century Britain: a false antithesis’, Journal of British Studies, 17 (1977), pp. 105–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Jones, H. S., ‘John Stuart Mill as moralist’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 53 (1992) pp. 287–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
13 For quoted text, see Jose Harris, Private lives, public spirit: a social history of Britain, 1870–1914 (Oxford, 1993), p. 11. See also William Howard Greenleaf, The British political tradition: the rise of collectivism (3 vols., London and New York, NY, 1983–7), I, pp. 27–8; Eric Daniels, ‘A brief history of individualism in American thought’, in Donelson Forsyth and Crystal Hoyt, eds., For the greater good of all: perspectives on individualism, society and leadership (New York, NY, 2011), pp. 75–6; and Charles McCann, Order and control in American socio-economic thought: social scientists and progressive era reform (New York, NY, 2012), pp. 1, 5.
14 Greenleaf, The British political tradition, pp. 15–17, 20–3; Stefan Collini, Liberalism and sociology: L. T. Hobhouse and political argument in England, 1880–1914 (Cambridge, 2009), p. 16.
15 Martin Pugh, The march of the women: a revisionist analysis of the campaign for women's suffrage, 1866–1914 (Oxford, 2002), pp. 171–233. This historiographical landscape has been discussed in Ellen Carol DuBois, Woman suffrage and women's rights (New York, NY, 1998), pp. 252–3; Mayhall, Laura, ‘Household and market in suffragette discourse, 1903–1914’, The European Legacy, 6 (2001), pp. 189–99Google Scholar, at p. 190.
16 Sandra Stanley Holton, ‘Silk dresses and lavender kid gloves: the wayward career of Jessie Craigen, working suffragist’, Women's History Review, 5 (1996), pp. 129–50; DuBois, Woman suffrage and women's rights, pp. 177–202, 252–75; Laura Schwartz, Feminism and the servant problem: class and domestic labour in the women's suffrage movement (Cambridge, 2019); Jenkins, Lyndsey, ‘Annie Kenney and the politics of class in the Women's Social and Political Union’, Twentieth Century British History, 30 (2019), pp. 477–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
17 These dates refer to the British context but a similar period of labour unrest took place in the US from 1912 to 1916.
18 Darlington, Ralph, ‘The pre-First World War British women's suffrage revolt and labour unrest: never the twain shall meet?’, Labor History, 61 (2020), pp. 466–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at pp. 470–1.
19 Joseph and Olive Banks, Feminism and family planning in Victorian England (Liverpool, 1964); Hacker, J. David, the, ‘Rethinking “early” decline of marital fertility in the United States’, Demography, 40 (2003), pp. 605–20Google ScholarPubMed.
20 Thomas Malthus, An essay on the principle of population, III (6th edn, London, 1826), p. 6.
21 Richard Soloway, Birth control and the population question (Chapel Hill, NC, 1982), pp. xii–xix.
22 Miriam Benn, The predicaments of love (London, 1992).
23 Angus McLaren, ‘Reproduction and revolution: Paul Robin and neo-Malthusianism in France’, in Brian Dolan, ed., Malthus, medicine and morality: Malthusianism after 1798 (Atlanta, GA, 2000), p. 167.
24 The discordant relationship between nineteenth-century Malthusianism and social reform movements was well explored in the Historical Journal issue on Malthusian moments. Gareth Stedman Jones, ‘Malthus, nineteenth-century socialism and Marx’, Historical Journal, 63 (2020), pp. 91–106; E. A. Wrigley and R. Smith, ‘Malthus and the Poor Law’, Historical Journal, 63 (2020), pp. 33–62.
25 Soloway, Birth control and the population question, pp. 86–9.
26 Ibid., p. 70
27 Ibid., pp. 77, 80.
28 Clare Debenham, Birth control and the rights of woman: post-suffrage feminism in the early twentieth century (London, 2014), pp. 110–11.
29 Stedman Jones, ‘Malthus, nineteenth-century socialism and Marx’, p. 101.
30 Soloway, Birth control and the population question, p. 85.
31 Offen, Debating the woman question, p. 255.
32 George Noyes Miller, The strike of a sex (London, 1891), pp. 16, 40.
33 W. H. Reynolds, ‘The strike of a sex’, The Malthusian (Feb. 1891), p. 10, and untitled editorial, The Malthusian (Sept. 1906), p. 71.
34 George Noyes Miller, After the sex struck or Zugassent's discovery (Boston, MA, 1895).
35 Untitled editorial, The Malthusian (Sept. 1906), p. 71.
36 Daily Herald, reprinted in ‘Jottings from the press’, The Malthusian (Apr. 1914), p. 32.
37 Editorial, ‘Another welcome sign of progress’, The Malthusian (Mar. 1918), p. 19.
38 C. V. Drysdale, ‘The freewoman and the birth rate II’, The Freewoman (21 Dec. 1911), p. 89.
39 Ibid., p. 89.
40 C. V. Drysdale, ‘The neglected side of the women's emancipation movement’, The Men's League for Women's Suffrage Monthly Paper (July 1914), p. 250.
41 Ibid., p. 251.
42 Ibid., p. 250.
43 Karl Marx, Capital: volume one (London, 1867), ch. 6.
44 Malthus, Essay on population, p. 28.
45 Soloway, Birth control and the population question, p. 77.
46 Dicey, Lectures on the relation between law and public opinion, pp. 260, 273–5; Daniels, ‘A brief history of individualism’, p. 78.
47 S. Webb, ‘Twentieth century politics’, in The basis and policy of socialism (London, 1908), p. 78. Quoted in Sandra Den Otter, ‘“Thinking in communities”: late nineteenth-century liberals, idealists and the retrieval of community’, Parliamentary History, 16 (1997), pp. 67–84.
48 Soloway, Birth control and the population question, pp. 79, 85; Debenham, Birth control and the rights of woman, pp. 110–11.
49 Barbara Taylor, Eve and the new Jerusalem: socialism and feminism in the nineteenth century (London, 1983), p. 1; DuBois, Woman suffrage and women's rights, pp. 259–61.
50 DuBois, Woman suffrage and women's rights, p. 261; Mari Jo Buhle, Women and American socialism, 1870–1920 (Urbana, IL, 1981), ch. 2; June Hannam and Karen Hunt, Socialist women: Britain, 1880s–1920s (London, 2002), p. 67.
51 DuBois, Woman suffrage and women's rights, p. 261. See also Meredith Tax, The rising of the women: feminist solidarity and class conflict, 1880–1917 (New York, NY, 1980), pp. 247–9.
52 David Howell, MacDonald's party: Labour identities and crisis, 1922–1931 (Oxford, 2002), pp. 356–69; Ben Jackson, Equality and the British left: a study in progressive political thought, 1900–1964 (Manchester, 2007), pp. 70–2.
53 Lise Vogel, Marxism and the oppression of women: towards a unitary theory (Rutgers, NJ, 1983); K. Weeks, The problem with work: feminism, Marxism, antiwork politics and postwork imaginaries (Durham, NC, 2011), pp. 113–50.
54 C. Eustance, ‘Meanings of militancy: the ideas and practice of political resistance in the Women's Freedom League, 1907–1914’, in M. Joannou and J. Purvis, eds., The women's suffrage movement: new feminist perspectives (Manchester, 1998), pp. 51–64.
55 ‘The imprisonment of women suffragists’, The Malthusian (Mar. 1907), p. 22.
56 ‘Reports of meetings’, The Malthusian (Mar. 1914), p. 21.
57 Women's Freedom League: minutes of their ninth annual conference, 1914. The Women's Library, London School of Economics (LSE), Add. MS 2WFL/2/07, p. 70.
58 Ibid., p. 61.
59 Ibid., pp. 62–3.
60 Soloway, Birth control and the population question, pp. 84–5.
61 Daily Herald as reprinted in ‘Jottings from the press’, The Malthusian (Apr. 1914), p. 32; editorial, ‘Another welcome sign of progress’, The Malthusian (Mar. 1918).
62 LSE, Add. MS 2WFL/2/07, p. 66.
63 Ibid., pp. 70–1.
64 Ibid., p. 9.
65 Ibid., p. 22.
66 Ibid., pp. 22–3.
67 Schwartz, Feminism and the servant problem, p. 133.
68 The Vote indicates there were two ‘Miss Murrays’ active in the organization at this time: Eunice Murray and Stella Murray, both writers. LSE, Add. MS 2WFL/2/07, p. 3.
69 Drysdale, ‘The neglected side of the women's emancipation movement’, p. 250.
70 Aileen Kraditor, The ideas of the woman suffrage movement, 1890–1920 (New York, NY, 1981), pp. 44–6; Rebecca DeWolf, Gendered citizenship: the original conflict over the Equal Rights Amendment, 1920–1963 (Lincoln, NB, 2021), pp. 44–7.
71 Mayhall, ‘Household and market in suffragette discourse’, p. 190.
72 ‘Sledgehammer’, ‘Progeny and militancy’, Daily Herald, 17 July 1913, p. 1.
73 Ibid., p. 1.
74 Ibid., p. 1.
75 Adickes, Sarah, ‘Sisters not demons: the influence of British suffragists on the American suffrage movement’, Women's History Review, 11 (2002), pp. 675–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Patricia Greenwood Harrison, Connecting links: the British and American women's suffrage movements, 1900–1914 (Westport, CT, 2000), pp. xv–xvi.
76 Carey, Jane, ‘The racial imperatives of sex: birth control and eugenics in Britain, the United States and Australia in the interwar years’, Women's History Review, 21 (2012), pp. 733–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
77 Lucy Delap, The feminist avant-garde: transatlantic encounters of the early twentieth century (Cambridge, 2007), p. 159.
78 ‘Hearings before the Committee on Woman Suffrage’ (Government Printing Office, 1916), p. 66.
79 Ibid., p. 66.
80 Ibid., p. 54
81 Ibid., p. 54.
82 Lesley Hall, The life and times of Stella Browne: feminist and free spirit (London, 2011).
83 Patricia Coates, Margaret Sanger and the origin of the birth control movement, 1910–1930: the concept of women's sexual autonomy (Lewiston, NY, 2008), p. 111.
84 Stella Browne, ‘Women and birth-control’, in Paul and Paul, eds., Population and birth-control, p. 252.
85 Ibid., pp. 248–51.
86 Ibid., p. 247.
87 Sheila Rowbotham, A new world for women: Stella Browne, socialist feminist (London, 1977), p. 17.
88 Browne, ‘Women and birth-control’, p. 256.
89 Michael Freeden and Greta Jones debated the relationship between eugenics and progressivism across a series of articles: Freeden, ‘Eugenics and progressive thought: a study in ideological affinity’, Historical Journal, 22 (1979), pp. 645–71; Jones, ‘Eugenics and social policy between the wars’, Historical Journal, 25 (1982), pp. 717–28; Freeden, ‘Eugenics and ideology’, Historical Journal, 4 (1982), pp. 959–92.
90 These debates are identified in Carey, ‘The racial imperatives of sex’; and Shannon Walsh, Eugenics and physical culture performance in the progressive era (Providence, RI, 2020), pp. 8–9. See also Sanger, Alexander, ‘Eugenics, race, and Margaret Sanger revisited: reproductive freedom for all?’, Hypatia, 22 (2007), pp. 210–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
91 Carey, ‘The racial imperatives of sex’, p. 735.
92 Browne, ‘Women and birth-control’, p. 251.
93 Carey, ‘The racial imperatives of sex’, p. 735; Ellen Chesler, Woman of valor: Margaret Sanger and the birth control movement in America (New York, NY, 1992).
94 Chesler, Woman of valor, p. 16; and Coates, Margaret Sanger, pp. 53–4.
95 Coates, Margaret Sanger, p. 111.
96 M. Sanger, ‘Large families and the steel strike’, Birth Control Review (Jan. 1920), p. 11.
97 Ibid., p. 11.
98 Goldman to Sanger, 26 May 1914, Emma Goldman Papers (accessed online May 2020).
99 ‘Free love is moral says Emma Goldman’, Evening Public Ledger (29 Apr. 1915), p. 3.
100 Susan Zimmermann, ‘The international labour organization, transnational women's networks, and the question of unpaid work in the interwar world’, in Clare Midgley, Alison Twells, and Julie Carlier, eds., Women in transnational history: connecting the local and the global (Abingdon, 2016), p. 33.
101 Saskia Sassen, ‘Towards a feminist analytics of the global economy’, in Sassen, ed., Globalization and its discontents (London and New York, NY, 1998), p. 82; Freeman, Carla, ‘Is local: global as feminine: masculine? Rethinking the gender of globalization’, Signs, 26 (2001), pp. 1007–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
102 Clare Midgley, Alison Twells, and Julie Carlier, ‘Introduction’, in Women in transnational history, p. 2.