Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-rvbq7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T18:40:31.912Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Working Class and State ‘Welfare’ in Britain, 1880–1914

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

Pat Thane
Pat Thane
Affiliation:
Goldsmiths' College, University of London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Some years ago Henry Pelling offered one of his stimulating and provocative challenges to a conventional wisdom of labour history. He pointed out that it is often assumed that the significant extensions of the welfare activities of the state by the post-1906 Liberal governments were in some way associated with the growth of the organized labour movement; that they were, if not simply responses to pressure from Labour (which has rarely been seriously argued), at least supported and welcomed by a significant proportion of the working class, and therefore could be expected by Liberal politicians to increase their credit with working-class voters, perhaps sufficiently to persuade them to resist the lure of Labour.

Type
Articles
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 27 , Issue 4 , December 1984 , pp. 877 - 900
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Pelling, Henry, ‘The working class and the welfare state’ in Popular politics and society in late Victorian Britain (1968)Google Scholar.

2 Gilbert, B. B., The evolution of national insurance in Great Britain (1964)Google Scholar; Gosden, P. H. J. H., Self-help. Voluntary associations in Great Britain (1973)Google Scholar.

3 Oddfellows Magazine, Oct. 1885, Jan. 1886, Aug., Sept., Oct. 1891, Jan. 1893, Jan. 1894, Jan. 1899, Hearts of Oak Journal, Oct. 1902.

4 Rechabite and Temperance Magazine, Mar. 1891.

5 Foresters' Miscellany, Apr. 1897.

6 Ibid. July 1896.

7 Ibid. Dec. 1894.

8 Ibid.

9 Ibid. June 1894.

10 Ibid. July 1896.

11 Ibid. Nov. 1895.

12 Gilbert, chapter 4.

13 Foresters' Miscellany, Dec. 1891.

14 Ryan, P. A., ‘Poplarism 1894–1930’ in Thane, Pat (ed.), The origins of British social policy (1978)Google Scholar.

15 And were being proposed by employers. See Hay, Roy, ‘Employers and social policy in Britain: the evolution of welfare legislation 1905–1914’, Social History, IV (01 1977)Google Scholar.

16 Report of the royal commission on the aged poor, C. 7684 (1895). Minutes of evidence, Q 12,342. Chamberlain, Joseph, ‘Old age pensions’, National Review, 02 1892Google Scholar.

17 Justice, 12 Apr. 1890.

18 Ibid. 9 Mar, 18 May, 22 June 1889; 4 Jan., 11 Jan., 5 Apr., 12 Apr. 1890 (inter alia).

19 Ibid. 5 July 1890.

20 Ibid. 5 Apr., 8 June, 5 July 1890; 2 Feb. 1891.

21 Ibid. 4 Mar., 18 May 1889; 24 Mar. 1894.

22 Ibid. 22 June 1889; 3 Oct. 1896 (inter alia).

23 Ibid. 16 July 1898.

24 Hyndman, H. M., A commune for London (1887)Google Scholar.

25 Justice, 2 Feb. 1889; 22 June 1889; 8 June, 14 Sept. 1890; 30 Nov. 1895; 31 Oct. 1896.

26 Hay; Melling, J., ‘Industrial strife and business welfare philosophy’, Business History, XXI (1979)Google Scholar; ‘Non-commissioned officers: British employers and their supervisory workers’, Social History, v (1980)Google Scholar; ‘Employers, industrial housing and the evolution of company welfare policies in Britain's heavy industry’, International Review of Social History, XXVI (1981)Google Scholar; Whiteside, N., ‘Industrial labour, unemployment and the growth of social insurance 1900–1930’ (Paper to the international economic history congress, Budapest, 08 1982)Google Scholar.

27 Whiteside.

28 ‘Fourth report of commissioners appointed to inquire into friendly and benefit building societies’ appendix XVI: Rules of the friendly societies in England and Scotland. (Parliamentary papers 1874, XXIII.)

29 Brown, E. H. Phelps, The growth of British industrial relations (London, 1959), p. 224Google Scholar.

30 Report of the annual conference of the T.U.C. 1896, pp. 29–31.

31 Ibid. 1890, pp. 27–9.

32 Ibid. p. 27; 1894, p. 20; 1898, p. 25, pp. 30–1; 1902, p. 36; 1903, p. 36; 1899, p. 45.

33 Burgess, Keith, ‘Working class response to social policy: the case of the Lancashire cotton textile districts 1880–1914’ (Paper to S.S.R.C. conference on social policy, University of Glasgow, 05 1978)Google Scholar.

34 Ibid.

35 Whiteside has begun this task.

36 Pelling, p. 18.

37 See, among others, Liverpool trades council, Annual reports, 1888–1889, 1894, 1896, 1901–2Google Scholar; Bradford trades council, Annual reports 1899, 1901, 1902, 1905Google Scholar; Leeds district trades and labour council, Annual reports, 1892, 1900, 1904, 1905Google Scholar; London trades council, Annual reports, 1889, 1891, 1899, 1900, 1901, 1902Google Scholar; Bolton and district united trades council, Annual reports, 1896, 1897Google Scholar; Birmingham trades council, Annual reports, 1889, 1890, 1895, 1897, 1898, 1901, 1907, 1909Google Scholar; Clinton, Alan, ‘Trades councils from the beginning of the 20th century to the second world war’ (Ph.D. thesis, University of London, 1973)Google Scholar, espec. ch. 3; and Clinton, A., The trade union rank and file (1977)Google Scholar. On Bradford, see Brockway, Fenner, Socialism over sixty years – a life of Jowitt of Bradford (1946)Google Scholar, Cahill, M. and Jowitt, T., ‘The new philanthropy: the emergence of the Bradford city guild of help’, Journal of Social Policy, II (1980)Google Scholar.

38 Clinton.

39 Liverpool trades council, Annual report, 1894Google Scholar.

40 Carlisle trades council, Annual report, 1910Google Scholar.

41 Pelling, p. 10.

42 Stead, F. H., How old age pensions began to be (London, 1910)Google Scholar; Rogers, F., Ten years work for old age pensions (London, 1909)Google Scholar and Labour, life and literature (London, 1913)Google Scholar; Annual reports and balance sheets N.C.O.L. 1899–1909, Williams, P. M. (Thane), ‘The development of old age pensions in the U.K. 1878–1925’ (Ph.D. thesis, University of London, 1970)Google Scholar.

43 Second and third annual reports and balance sheets N.C.O.L., 1900 and 1901.

44 Third annual report and balance sheet N.C.O.L., 1901.

45 Ibid. 1904.

46 Introduction to Englander, David (ed.), The diary of Fred Knee. (Oxford, 1977)Google Scholar.

47 Housing Journal, Aug. 1900, Mar. 1901, Sept. 1901, Oct. 1901, Feb. 1904, Feb., Mar., June 1905, Apr., July 1906, Jan. 1906.

48 Ibid. Mar. 1901.

49 Ibid. Jan. 1901.

50 Ibid. Mar. 1901.

51 Ibid. Aug. 1901.

52 Brown, K. D., Labour and unemployment (Newton Abbot, 1971)Google Scholar; Harris, Jose, Unemployment and politics 1886–1914; (Oxford, 1972)Google Scholar, chs. II and v.

53 Pollard, Sidney, ‘The foundation of the co-operative party’ in Briggs, A. and Saville, J. (eds.), Essays in labour history (1971)Google Scholar; Co-operative congress reports, 1890, p. 12; 1891, p. iii; 1892, pp. 55, 65, 115–121.

54 Co-operative congress report, 1890, pp. 12ff.

55 Women's co-operative guild, Annual reports, 1893–1914Google Scholar.

56 Ibid. 1897, 1901, 1902.

57 The extension of co-operation to the poor: report of an enquiry by the women's co-operative guild (London, 1902), p. 19.

58 Labour Leader, 13 Mar., 29 May 1908.

59 Massingham, H. W., ‘The Newcastle programme’ Labour Leader, 10 10 1891Google Scholar, 31 Oct., 21 Nov. 1891.

60 Ibid. 28 Nov. 1891.

61 Labour Leader, 10 Oct., 17 Oct., 24 Oct., 14 Nov., 12 Dec. 1891; 22 Nov. 1907; 31 Jan., 7 Feb., 13 Mar., 20 Mar., 12 Apr. 1908; 27 Jan., 3 Feb., 17 Feb. 1911.

62 Leading articles in Labour Leader, 17 Oct., 28 Nov. 1891.

63 Ibid. 7 Nov., 28 Nov., 5 Dec. 1891; 20 Jan., 12 May 1911.

64 Ibid. 10 Oct., 17 Oct., 28 Nov., 5 Dec. 1891; 17 Jan., 13 Mar. 1908.

65 Russell, A. K., Liberal landslide (Newton Abbot, 1973), pp. 65–83Google Scholar.

66 Barker, R., Education and politics 1900–51: a study of the Labour Party (Oxford, 1972)Google Scholar.

67 Minutes of the London school board 1871, quoted in Rubinstein, D., School attendance in London 1870–1904 (Hull, 1969), p. 84Google Scholar.

68 Rubinstein, pp. 138ff.

69 Ibid. p. 62.

70 Ibid. p. 91.

71 Ibid. pp. 90–1.

72 Pelling, pp. 2;ndash;6.

73 Pat Thane, ‘Contributory vs. non-contributory pensions 1878–1908’ in Thane (ed.), Origins of British social policy.

74 Lewis, Jane, The politics of motherhood (1980), pp. 18–20Google Scholar.

75 Joslin, D. and Winter, J. (eds.), R. H. Tawney's commonplace book (Cambridge, 1972), pp. 3–4Google Scholar.

76 Hay, J. R., The origins of the Liberal welfare reforms 1906–14 (1975), p. 28Google Scholar; Yeo, S., ‘Working class association, private capital, welfare and the state in the late 19th and 20th centuries’ in Parry, N., Rustin, M. and Satyamurti, C., Social work, welfare and the state (1977), pp. 70–1Google Scholar.

77 Reynolds, Stephen, Bob, and Woolley, Tom, Seems So! A working class view of politics (1911), p. 328Google Scholar.

78 Ibid. p. 178.

79 Wright, H. (ed.), Letters of Stephen Reynolds (1923), p. 142Google Scholar.

80 Seems So!, p. 329.

81 Pelling, p. 19.

82 Foresters' Miscellany, Feb. 1903; Oct. 1904; Apr., July, Sept. 1907; Williams, p. 167.

83 Gilbert, pp. 109–11.

84 Justice, 19 Aug. 1890; Clinton, p. 84; Women's co-operative guild, Annual report, 1903.

85 Thane, pp. 99–104; Williams, pp. 200–35; Ninth annual report and balance sheet N.C.O.L., 1908.

86 Thompson, Flora, Lark rise (Oxford, 1940), p. 100Google Scholar.

87 The Times, 12 May 1908; Williams, p. 218.

88 Liverpool trades council minutes, 13 May 1908.

89 Hay, , ‘;Employers and social policy’, pp. 442–53Google Scholar.

90 For discussion of Labour's contribution to the making and timing of these measures see Saville, John ‘The welfare state: an historical approach’, New Reasoner, 1, 3, 5–25Google Scholar; Thompson's, Dorothy reply, New Reasoner, 1, 4, 128–9Google Scholar; and the comments by Hay, , Origins of the Liberal welfare reforms, pp. 25–9Google Scholar.

91 Brown, pp. 144–60.

92 League Leaflet, Jan. 1911. Harris, pp. 317–18, 329–30, 354.

93 Report of the royal commission on the aged poor, C. 7684 (1895). Minutes of evidence, QQ, 16,926–8. Report of the select committee on the aged deserving poor (1899), evidence of Tuckwell, G.Google Scholar.

94 League Leaflet, Jan., Mar., Apr., May–Nov. 1912; Jan.–May 1913; Labour Woman, Jan. 1914.

95 Labour Leader, 1 Mar., 5 Apr. 1907.

96 League Leaflet, Mar. 1913.

97 Daily Herald, 20 Apr., 26 Apr., 8 May, 29 June, 13 Aug., 23 Sept. 1913 inter alia.

98 Lansbury, G., ‘Socialists and socialism’, Daily Herald, 13 01 1913Google Scholar.

99 Daily Herald leader, ‘The great employers’ act', 12 Sept. 1912.

100 Harris, p. 354.

101 Daily Herald, 29 June, 10 July, 14 Aug. 1912.

102 Clinton, pp. 94–5.

103 T.U.C. Annual reports, 1909, pp. 155–7Google Scholar; 1910, pp. 191–2; Whiteside, p. 10.

104 Harris, ch. vi; Whiteside, p. 10.

105 A T.U.C. special conference on labour exchanges held in 1909 supported them ‘provided that the management boards contain an equal proportion of employers and representatives of trade unions’. T.U.C. Report, 1909, p. 54Google Scholar; League Leaflet, Mar. 1912; Whiteside, p. 10; Harris, pp. 354–5.