Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-t6hkb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T17:51:28.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

BURGLARY INSURANCE AND THE CULTURE OF FEAR IN BRITAIN, c. 1889–1939*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2011

ELOISE MOSS
ELOISE MOSS*
Affiliation:
Magdalen College, University of Oxford
*
Magdalen College, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 4AUEloise.Moss@magd.ox.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article explores the representations of burglary and burglars created by the burglary insurance sector in late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century Britain. Two lines of argument are developed: first, that the marketing strategy of the burglary insurance sector exacerbated existing fears about the nature and prevalence of burglary in a calculated bid to attract custom; and secondly, that the depictions of crime and criminal used in marketing this form of insurance were subsequently revised in the contracts issued to customers as part of the industry's commercial transactions, thereby securing against supposed ‘negligence’ by homeowners as well as malicious attempts to defraud insurers. As the self-styled commercial ‘protection’ against burglary, burglary insurance became an ordinary household investment. Its prosperity therefore enables us to identify certain ideas about crime and criminal then current. Crucially, this research highlights the intersection of media, state, and market discourse about crime in weaving a specific version of burglary into the very fabric of everyday life, uniting three domains that historians of crime have traditionally treated separately.

Type
Articles
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 54 , Issue 4 , December 2011 , pp. 1039 - 1064
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This research was enabled by the generous funding of the Arts and Humanities Research Council. I have given versions of this article at Oxford, Sheffield, and Vermont: thanks to all who attended for their helpful comments and criticisms. Matt Houlbrook's insights, advice, and encouragement have pushed my ideas much further than they would otherwise have ventured, for which I am extremely grateful. Many thanks also to the journal's editor and anonymous reader for their suggestions. I am indebted to the patient assistance of Hannah West at the Chartered Institute of Insurance Archives; Morgannis Graham at the Prudential Group Archives; Peter Welch, Senior Information Officer at Lloyds; and Clare George at the Royal Mail Archives.

References

1 Chartered Institute of Insurance Archives (CII): 9.94 box 158, Law Accident Insurance Society, Burglars and burgling (London, 1899), pp. 4–5Google Scholar.

2 Ibid., pp. 19, 21–2, 25, 27.

3 Ibid., preface, pp. 7–8, 17, 18.

4 In its final pages the pamphlet asserted that the scope of their policies had been extended to insure those residing ‘in any Private Dwelling House, Hotel, Inn, Boarding or Lodging House’, thereby offering coverage for those renting properties in addition to homeowners. Ibid., p. 30.

5 Ibid., p. 25.

6 ‘Waxwork tragedy from heat’, Daily Mirror, 19 Aug. 1906, p. 3; ‘Chamber of horrors’, Daily Express, 29 Nov. 1907, p. 4; ‘Million pound wax palace’, Daily Express, 2 Mar. 1928, p. 9.

7 CII: 9.94 box 158, Law Accident Insurance Society, Burglars and burgling, pp. 25–6.

8 See 1861 Larceny Act, 24 and 25 Vict. c. 96. For analysis of journalistic reportage of crime in London during the 1880s see Walkowitz, Judith, City of dreadful delight: narratives of sexual danger in late-Victorian London (Chicago, IL, 1992), pp. 81–120, 191–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 Walkowitz, City of dreadful delight, pp. 28–32.

10 Ibid., p. 30.

11 Ibid., pp. 31–2; Wiener, Martin, Men of blood: violence, manliness, and criminal justice in Victorian England (Cambridge, 2004), pp. 28–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 As V. A. C. Gatrell observes, against the trend of decrease in theft and violence in other forms of larceny in England during the Victorian and Edwardian periods, burglary continued to rise in statistical prevalence. V. A. C. Gatrell, ‘The decline of theft and violence in Victorian and Edwardian England’, in V. A. C. Gatrell, Bruce Lenman, and Geoffrey Parker, eds., Crime and the law: the social history of crime in Western Europe since 1500 (London, 1980), pp. 331–3.

13 Reddy, William, The navigation of feeling: a framework for the history of emotions (Cambridge, 2001), pp. 105–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 See Beck, Ulrich, Risk society: towards a new modernity (London, 1986)Google Scholar; Giddens, Anthony, The consequences of modernity (Cambridge, 1990)Google Scholar; discussion in Tim Newburn, Criminology (Cullompton, 2007), pp. 329–38.

15 Carrabine, Eamonn, Crime, culture and the media (Cambridge, 2008), pp. 49–50Google Scholar.

16 Marcus, Sharon, Apartment stories: city and home in nineteenth-century Paris and London (London, 1999), p. 94Google Scholar; Cohen, Deborah, Household gods: the British and their possessions (London, 2006), pp. 136, 122–44Google Scholar.

17 On the historic evolution of the relationship between insurance advertising and combined appeals to fear and prudence, see Geoffrey Clark and Gregory Anderson, ‘Introduction’, in Geoffrey Clark, Gregory Anderson, Christian Thomann, and J.-Matthias Graf von der Schulenburg, eds., The appeal of insurance (London, 2010), pp. 3–4.

18 Thomson, Matthew, Psychological subjects: identity, culture and health in twentieth-century Britain (Oxford, 2007), p. 156Google Scholar.

19 McFall, Liz, Advertising: a cultural economy (London, 2004), pp. 169–70Google Scholar, 182.

20 Lucas, D. B. and Benson, C. E., Psychology for advertisers (London, 1930), p. 117CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

21 Wiener, Martin, Reconstructing the criminal: culture, law, and policy in England, 1830–1914 (Cambridge, 1990)Google Scholar; Walkowitz, City of dreadful delight; Frost, Ginger, Promises broken: courtship, class and gender in Victorian England (London, 1995)Google Scholar; D'Cruze, Shani, Crimes of outrage: sex, violence and Victorian working women (London, 1998)Google Scholar; Wiener, Men of blood.

22 For scholarship on the role of crime in everyday life in this period, see for example: Frost, Promises broken; Shore, Heather, Artful dodgers: youth and crime in early nineteenth-century London (Woodbridge, 1999), pp. 55–74Google Scholar; collected articles in D'Cruze, Shani, ed., Everyday violence in Britain, 1850–1950 (London, 2000)Google Scholar; Jackson, Louise, Child sexual abuse in Victorian England (London, 2000)Google Scholar.

23 Clark, Geoffrey, Betting on lives: the culture of life insurance in England, 1695–1775 (Manchester, 1999)Google Scholar; Odih, Pamela, Advertising in modern and postmodern times (London, 2007), pp. 52–66Google Scholar.

24 See for example display advertising, Daily Express, 14 May 1904, p. 8.

25 ‘Insurance against burglary’, Pall Mall Gazette, 31 Oct. 1889, p. 7; F. D. McMillan, ‘Burglary insurance’, in Reginald C. Simmons and Joseph H. Matthews, eds., The insurance guide and handbook vol. II (6th edn, London, 1922), pp. 248–9; F. D. McMillan, and Woodroof, F. J., Outlines of burglary insurance (2nd edn,London, 1924), p. 13Google Scholar; ‘Burglary insurance’, in J. B. Welson, ed., Pitman's dictionary of accident insurance (2nd edn, London, 1938), p. 44; Golding, C. E., Burglary insurance (1921: 4th edn., London, 1949), pp. 2–3Google Scholar.

26 ‘Insurance against burglary’, Pall Mall Gazette, 31 Oct. 1889, p. 7.

27 McMillan and Woodroof, Outlines, p. 13; Golding, Burglary, pp. 2–3.

28 CII: 9.701TEKN, Early 1890s prospectuses of other accident offices: General Accident AssuranceGoogle Scholar Corporation (n.d.); CII: 9.701TEKN, Early 1890s prospectuses of other accident offices: Law Accident and Contingency Insurance Society (n.d.)Google Scholar; CII: 9.701TEKN, Early 1890s prospectuses of other accident offices: National Accident Insurance Company (n.d.)Google Scholar; CII: 9.701TEKN, Early 1890s prospectuses of other accident offices: Security Company (n.d.)Google Scholar.

29 The National Archives (TNA): BT 31/4674/30757, Certificate of registration 30757 – the Burglary Insurance Corporation Ltd., 4 Feb. 1889; Carter, Robert L. and Falush, Peter, The British insurance industry since 1900 (Basingstoke, 2009), pp. 7–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

30 House of Commons Parliamentary Papers (HCPP),: C.8072, Judicial statistics, England and Wales, 1894. Part I. – Criminal statistics (London, 1896), p. 14Google Scholar.

31 CII: 9.701TEKN, General Accident Corporation [189?], p. 28; CII: 9.701TEKN, Security Company [189?], p. 89.

32 Reddy, Navigation of feeling, p. 107.

33 See, for example, estimations of statistical indices of crimes against property in HCPP: C.7725, Judicial statistics, England and Wales, 1893. Part I. Criminal statistics (London, 1895), p. 108Google Scholar.

34 CII: 9.701TEKN, Early 1890s prospectuses of other accident offices: Goldsmiths and General Burglary Insurance Association, Ltd. [189?], p. 33Google Scholar.

35 TNA: MEPO 3/1211, Imparting information to insurance companies where fraud suspected: Home Office observations on correct police procedure, 1937.

36 I use the term ‘translation’ here in the sense ascribed it by Reddy; as a twofold process of the identification and selection of the desired language by the author and the internalized emotional response the use of a term such as ‘insecurity’ was intended to elicit. Reddy, , Navigation of feeling, pp. 78–9, 110–11Google Scholar.

37 Marcus, Apartment stories, p. 94.

38 London Metropolitan Archives (LMA): MS15048, Miscellaneous burglary insurance policy documents: Army, Navy and General Assurance Association Limited (190?)Google Scholar; CII: 9.701TEKN, General Accident Corporation [189?], p. 28.

39 See for example LMA: MS15048, Miscellaneous burglary insurance policy documents: The National General Insurance Company Limited [1907]Google Scholar; The Alliance Assurance Company Limited [190?].

40 CII: 9.701 CN 8CHW9, Correspondence and directory of clients: R. P. Walker and Son: letter to F. G. Cubitt Esq. from R. P. Walker and Son, 14 July 1904, p. 796.

41 ‘District courts’, Bromley District Times, 10 June 1904, p. 5.

42 CII: 9.94 box 158, Law Accident Insurance Society, Burglars and burgling, p. 31Google Scholar; CII: 9.701TEKN, General Accident Corporation [189?], pp. 30, 28; CII: 9.701TEKN, Goldsmiths and General Burglary Insurance Association Ltd [189?], p. 33; CII: 9.701TEKN, Early 1890s prospectuses of other accident offices : Ocean Accident and Guarantee Corporation Ltd (n.d.), pp. 43, 58Google Scholar; CII: 9.701TEKN, Security Company Limited, (n.d.), p. 89; LMA: MS15048, Miscellaneous burglary insurance policy documents: Post Office Employees’ Mutual Guarantee Association Limited, 12 July 1893Google Scholar; LMA: MS15048, Miscellaneous burglary insurance policy documents: Fine Art Insurance Company Limited [189?]Google Scholar; LMA: MS15048, Miscellaneous burglary insurance policy documents: Army, Navy and General Assurance Association, Limited [190?]Google Scholar.

43 Cohen, Household gods, pp. 136, 122–44.

44 See for example: CII: 9.701 CN 8CHW9, letter to D. Mason, Esq. from R. P. Walker and Son, 26 Mar. 1901, p. 16; CII: 9.701 CN 8CHW9, letter to Col. A. W. Chambers from R. P. Walker and Son, 13 May 1902, p. 231; CII: 9.701 CN 8CHW9, letter to Mrs Abbott from R. P. Walker and Son, 9 June 1902, p. 256.

45 O'Connell, Sean, Credit and community: working-class debt in the UK since 1880 (Oxford, 2009), pp. 26–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

46 CII: 9.94 box 138 item 1, Buttifant, O., untitled article, in How to train a young agent, written by 20 successful insurance men (London: 190?), p. 9Google Scholar.

47 Gullace, Nicoletta, The blood of our sons: men, women, and the renegotiation of British citizenship during the Great War (Basingstoke, 2002), pp. 2–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

48 ‘10 burglaries in one district in 12 hours’, Scotsman, 15 Dec. 1920, p. 7.

49 Vickery, Amanda, ‘An Englishman's home is his castle? Thresholds, boundaries and privacies in the eighteenth-century London house’, Past and Present, 199 (2008), p. 149CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

50 Reddy, Navigation of feeling, p. 106.

51 ‘10 burglaries’, Scotsman, 15 Dec. 1920, p. 7.

52 Kingsley-Kent, Susan, Gender and power in Britain, 1640–1990 (London, 1999), pp. 287–310Google Scholar.

53 ‘Bolts and locks offer very little resistance to the modern burglar’, Times, 23 May 1923, p. 14Google Scholar.

54 Headline advert, Morning Post, 7 July 1921, p. 1; headline advert, People, 20 June 1920, p. 1; Daily Telegraph, 5 July 1921, p. 2; see for example Scotsman, 15 Dec. 1920, p. 7; Daily Mail, 29 Jan. 1920, p. 3; Daily Express, 14 Dec. 1920, p. 1.

55 ‘What's happening at home?’, Times, 8 July 1921, p. 13.

56 Joanne Hollows, ‘The science of spells: cooking, lifestyle and domestic femininities in British Good Housekeeping in the interwar period’, in David Bell and Joanne Hollows, eds., Historicising lifestyle: mediating taste, consumption and identity from the 1900s to 1970s (Aldershot, 2006), pp. 21–39.

57 Burn, Joseph, ‘Newspaper insurance’, Prudential Bulletin, 3:32 (Dec. 1922), p. 379Google Scholar.

58 Gullace, The blood of our sons, p. 2; see also Kent, Susan Kingsley, Aftershocks: politics and trauma in Britain, 1918–1931 (Basingstoke, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

59 See for example ‘Recent burglaries’, Times, 1 Jan. 1927, p. 12.

60 ‘The kiosk at the British Empire Exhibition’, Prudential Bulletin, 5:51 (July 1924), p. 641Google Scholar.

61 J. M. Mackenzie, ‘The popular culture of empire in Britain’, in Judith Brown and W. M. Roger Louis, eds., The Oxford history of the British empire: the twentieth century (Oxford, 1999), p. 214.

62 See for example ‘Royal London Mutual Insurance’, Evening Standard, 8 Jan. 1930, p. 7; ‘Norwich Union insurance society’, Daily Mirror, 1 Oct. 1931, p. 6; ‘Hackney’, John Bull, 3 Oct. 1931, p. 23; ‘Your best free insurance’, Daily Mail, 1 Jan. 1934, p. 11; ‘It's different – and it's free’, Daily Mirror, 22 Jan. 1935, p. 12; ‘Epidemic of robberies’, Ideal Home, Apr. 1935, p. lxv; ‘News Chronicle free insurance’, Daily Chronicle, 1 Jan. 1936, p. 6; ‘Over £500,000 to registered readers’, John Bull, 22 Aug. 1936, p. 4; ‘Atlas Assurance Company Limited’, Daily Express, 24 June 1937, p. 24; ‘Alliance Assurance Company Limited’, Times, 14 July 1937, p. 19; ‘Atlas Assurance Company Limited’, Times, 16 Mar. 1938, p. 17; ‘Royal London Mutual Insurance’, Daily Mirror, 26 Apr. 1939, p. 22.

63 ‘Our picture gallery’, Prudential Bulletin, 13:144 (Apr. 1932), p. 1992; Champness, Arthur, A century of progress: the General Life Assurance Company (London, 1937), p. 36Google Scholar.

64 See for example ‘Safes should be thief-resisting’, Times, 23 Sept. 1932, p. 14.

65 John Butt, ‘Life assurance in war and depression: the Standard Life Assurance Company and its environment, 1914–1939’, in Oliver M. Westall, ed., The historian and the business of insurance (Manchester, 1984), p. 156.

66 Royal Mail Archives (RMA): POST 33/149A, file no. 35 (14 June 1923–15 Oct. 1925) memo. 1 Nov. 1923; RMA: POST 33/149A, minute, 14 June 1923; RMA: POST 33/149A, letter from S. E. Knight, 19 June 1923; RMA: POST 33/149A, ‘Further statement of Mr. S. E. Knight made at the investigation branch’, 16 Nov. 1923.

67 RMA: POST 33/149A, letter to S. E. Knight from the Fine Art and General Insurance Company Limited, 3 Dec. 1923; RMA: POST 33/149A, letter to the secretary, Fine Art and General Insurance Company from S. E. Knight, 27 Nov. 1923.

68 RMA: POST 33/149A, letter to the secretary, Fine Art and General Insurance Company from D. A. Stroud, 8 Nov. 1923.

69 RMA: POST 33/148, file no. 22 (17 Mar. – 26 Aug. 1916), letter from C. A. Comber, postmaster, to ‘The Controller’, 17 Mar. 1916; RMA: POST 33/148, memo. ‘B. H. A.’ to the staff branch, 8 May 1916.

70 Davie, Neil, ‘Criminal man revisited? Continuity and change in British criminology, c. 1865–1918’, Journal of Victorian Culture, 8 (2003), pp. 1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

71 Laub, John H. and Sampson, Robert J., ‘The Sutherland–Glueck debate: on the sociology of criminal knowledge’, American Journal of Sociology, 96 (May 1991), pp. 1402–40Google Scholar.

72 Larceny Act 1916, Geo. V c. 50. ss. 6 and 7, paragraph 28:4 (a).

73 LMA: ACC/1294/82, burglary insurance policy issued by the Security Company to Mary Elizabeth Phillips, 4 Aug. 1897; CII: 9.701 CN 8CHW9: letter to Miss Oxleford from R. P. Walker and Son (10 June 1901), p. 45; letter to Miss P. C. Foster from R. P. Walker and Son, 18 Oct. 1901, p. 105; letter to Lady Edith Cregeen from R. P. Walker and Son, 19 Nov. 1901, p. 131; letter to Mrs M. J. Witlaw from R. P. Walker and Son, 23 Dec. 1901, p. 157.

74 LMA: ACC/1294/88, letter from the Royal Insurance Company to Mary Elizabeth Phillips, 13 Jan. 1917.

75 CII: 9.701 CN 8CHW9, Correspondence and directory of clients: R. P. Walker and Son (1900–4).

76 CII: 9.701 CN 8CHW9: letter to Lady Edith Cregeen from R. P. Walker and Son, 19 Nov. 1901, p. 131; letter to Miss Isaacson from R. P. Walker and Son, 26 Mar. 1903, p. 446; letter to Miss E. A. Francis, 27 Apr. 1903; letter to Miss A. F. Willson from R. P. Walker and Son, 16 June 1903, p. 505; letter to Mrs. Smith from R. P. Walker and Son, 7 Apr. 1904, p. 697.

77 Bingham, Adrian, ‘“An era of domesticity”? Histories of women and gender in interwar Britain’, Cultural and Social History, 1 (2004), pp. 225–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

78 RMA: POST 33/149A, ‘Further statement of Mr. S. E. Knight’, 16 Nov. 1923.

79 ‘Is insurance a real safeguard?’, Daily Mirror, 18 Apr. 1904, p. 4.

80 ‘Insurance co.'s strange methods’, John Bull, 27 Nov. 1926, p. 15.

81 ‘Great art robbery’, Daily Mirror, 28 Feb. 1907, p. 4; ‘Burgled by consent’, Daily Mirror, 26 July 1913, p. 13; ‘Sham burglary case’, Daily Express, 24 Apr. 1923, p. 5; ‘Famous folk who swindle’, John Bull, 16 Oct. 1926, p. 24; ‘Bogus burglary allegation’, Daily Express, 27 June 1933, p. 9.

82 ‘Law report, April 20’, Times, 21 Apr. 1923, p. 5.

83 Ibid.

84 ‘High Court of Justice’, Times, 24 Apr. 1923, p. 5.

85 The legal definition of burglary in both the 1861 and 1916 Larceny Acts was conditional upon forced entry into a dwelling house with the intent to commit a felony (theft), or forced entry out of a dwelling house having committed a felony within, between the hours of nine o'clock in the evening and six o'clock the following morning (legally ‘night’ time). Larceny Act 1861, 24 & 25 Vict. c. 96, ss. 50–9; Larceny Act 1916, Geo. V c. 50. ss. 6–7.

86 ‘An army of bogus bankrupts’, John Bull, 19 Sept. 1931, pp. 18–19.

87 Golding, Burglary, p. 35.