Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-vt8vv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-08-11T08:21:02.570Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Acknowledging Knowledge: Dissemination and Reception of Expertise in Colonial Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 May 2014

Dmitri van den Bersselaar
Dmitri van den Bersselaar*
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

At every level, the functioning of African colonial societies depended on the availability and mediation of useful information and knowledge. The majority of the existing literature on “colonial knowledge” focuses on one area of this broad field: the various forms of knowledge about their subjects on which colonial states depended. Most of our attempts to understand such knowledge have tended to analyze colonial knowledge as a system: we have tried to identify which were the sets of shared basic assumptions and rules that governed the creation and presentation of knowledge. In analyzing the processes through which colonial knowledge was produced, we have looked at the role of “Orientalism” and other forms of “Othering.” We have examined various investigative modalities. Finally, we have seen how such knowledge may be compared to a pidgin language that allows for communication between colonizers and representatives of the colonized. We have also examined the opportunities for Africans to manipulate the outcomes of colonial knowledge creation, as well as such basic but essential factors as the realities of government support and funding.

Type
Research Article
Information
History in Africa , Volume 33 , 2006 , pp. 389 - 393
Copyright
Copyright © African Studies Association 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Loomba, Ania, Colonialism/Postcolonialism (London, 1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Cohn, Bernard S., Colonialism and its Forms of Knowledge. The British in India (Princeton, NJ, 1996)Google Scholar; Thomas, Nicholas, Colonialism's Culture: Anthropology, Travel and Government (Cambridge, 1994)Google Scholar; van den Bersselaar, Dmitri, “Establishing the Facts: P. A. Talbot and the 1921 Census of Nigeria,” HA 31(2004), 69–102Google Scholar.

3 Pels, Peter, “The Pidginization of Luguru Politics: Administrative Ethnography and the Paradoxes of Indirect Rule,” American Ethnologist 23/4(1996), 1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Ibid.; Kuklick, Henrika, The Savage Within. The Social History of British Anthropology, 1885-1945 (Cambridge, 1991)Google Scholar; Stocking, George W. Jr., After Tylor: British Social Anthropology 1888-1951 (Madison, 1995), 367–426Google Scholar.

5 Scott, James C., Seeing Like a State. How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed (New Haven, 1998), 23–37Google Scholar.

6 Van den Bersselaar, , “Establishing the Facts,” 88–92Google Scholar.

7 Cohen, David William, Miescher, Stephen F. and White, Luise, “Introduction: Voices, Words, and African History” in eadem., eds., African Words, African Voices: Critical Practices in Oral History (Bloomington, 2001), 5Google Scholar.

8 Vaughan, Olufemi, Nigerian Chiefs: Traditional Power in Modern Politics, 1890s-1990s (Rochester, 2000), 34–35Google Scholar; Watson, Ruth, ‘Civil Disorder is the Disease of Ibadan’: Chieftaincy and Civic Culture in a Yoruba City (Oxford, 2003), 124–28Google Scholar; Nwaubani, Ebere, “Chieftaincy among the Igbo: a Guest on the Center-Stage,” IJAHS 27(1994), 369Google Scholar.