Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T00:24:12.417Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sudan Notes and Records and Sudanese Nationalism, 1918–1956*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2014

Bushra Hamad
Bushra Hamad*
Affiliation:
Cornell University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Sudan Notes and Records (hereafter SNR or simply “the journal”) was a leading African scholarly journal on Sudanese studies established by the British administration of the Anglo-Egyptian Sudan in 1918. Perhaps because of the high scientific standards it upheld throughout its life span, the political underpinnings that accompanied its foundation might not be so apparent. This study argues that, from its founding until the late 1940s, when the British administration was paving the way for a transfer of power to the Sudanese, SNR had ostensibly political orientations as reflected, among other things, in the editorial policy of the journal. The political leanings of SNR had two dimensions: internal and external.

On the internal level, editorial policy in the 1920s favored notables and tribal chiefs, rather than the intelligentsia, by allotting space in this periodical to articles “written” by Sudanese sheikhs, a phenomenon occurring at a time when the policy of Indirect Rule figured most prominently in the calculation of the administration. In the late 1930s the administration courted the intelligentsia, offering them greater opportunities in the civil service and higher education abroad. The editorial policy of SNR favored these educated elements by publishing articles and correspondences written by the intelligentsia, including Sayyed Abd el-Rahman el-Mahdi, the patron of a prominent Sudanese political party—the Umma. Until independence in 1956, the Sudanization of contribution to the journal became one of the focal points of editorial notes.

On the external level, the political bias of SNR was directly linked to the British policy vis-à-vis Egyptian claims of sovereignty over the Sudan. The study contends that one of the tactics the British used to separate the Sudan from Egypt was to foster the concept of nationalism among the Sudanese through archeological research. One of the prime vehicles for the spread of this concept was in fact SNR, whose very nature was questioned in the late 1940s by its own subscribers.

Type
Research Article
Information
History in Africa , Volume 22 , January 1995 , pp. 239 - 270
Copyright
Copyright © African Studies Association 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I would like to thank my colleagues at the University of Texas, Austin, for their comments on earlier versions of this paper.

References

Notes

1. Sanderson, G. N., “Sudan Notes and Records as a Vehicle of Research on the Sudan,” SNR 45 (1964), 169.Google Scholar

2. For details on Mahdism see Holt, P. M., The Mahdist State in the Sudan, 1881-1898 (Oxford, 1970).Google Scholar

3. For details of the Condominium Accord see Abbas, Mekki, The Sudan Question: The Dispute Over the Anglo-Egyptian Condominium 1884-1951 (London, 1952)Google Scholar; Warburg, Gabriel, The Sudan Under Wingate (London, 1971).Google Scholar

4. See Ibrahim, Hasan A., “Mahdists Risings against the Condominium government in the Sudan 1900-1927,” IJAHS 12 (1979), 441Google Scholar; Collins, R. O., Land Beyond the Rivers, (New Haven, 1971), 162.Google Scholar

5. See Najila, Hasan, Malamih min al-mujtamc al-sudani (Features of Sudanese Society), (Beirut, 1964), 25Google Scholar; Rahim, M. Abdel, “Early Sudanese Nationalism: 1900-1938,” SNR 47 (1966), 39–64.Google Scholar

6. Beshir, Mohamed O., Revolution and Nationalism in the Sudan (New York, 1974), 122–23Google Scholar, argues that Symes' policy “aimed at building a modern nation through ‘an administration working first and foremost in collaboration not with tribal authorities but with the Sudanese intelligentsia,’” and that his subsequent policies prompted them to visit Britain and to study in universities in Britain and Lebanon. In addition the Sudan Cultural Centre was established.

7. Mahgoub, Mohamed A., Democracy on Trial: Reflections on Arab and African Politics (London, 1974), 45.Google Scholar

8. Silberman, Neil, Between Past and Present: Archaeology, Ideology, and Nationalism in the Modern Middle East (New York, 1989), 3, 8.Google Scholar

9. Ibid.

10. Editorial Notes, SNR 7 (1924), 1Google Scholar; Editorial Notes, SNR 31 (1950), 4.Google Scholar Part of this information on the inception of the journal was brought up in the course of Stack's obituary.

11. Ibid.

12. SNR 1 (1918), 64.Google Scholar

13. Editorial, SNR 3 (1920), 76.Google Scholar

14. Ali, A. I. M., “Contemporary British Views on the Khalifa's Rule,” SNR 51 (1970), 44.Google Scholar

15. Wingate, R. F., “Foreword,” SNR 1 (1918), i.Google Scholar

16. Ibid.

17. Sanderson, , “Sudan Notes,” 164.Google Scholar

18. For more information see MacMichael, H. A., The Sudan Political Service (Oxford: Oxford University Press, n.d.)Google Scholar; Davies, R., The Camel's Back: Service in the Rural Sudan (London, 1957), 7Google Scholar; Baring, Evelyn, Earl of Cromer, Modern Egypt (2 vols.: London, 1908), 2:548Google Scholar; Sanderson, , “Sudan Notes,” 164.Google Scholar

19. Editorial Notes, SNR 1 (1918), 54–55Google Scholar; Nicholls, W., “The Sakia in Dongola Province,” SNR 1 (1918), 23.Google ScholarSakiya (or Saqiyah) literally means a waterwheel used for irrigating land, but is more commonly used to include the land itself.

20. Crowfoot, J. W., “George Reisner: An Impression,” Antiquity 17 (1943), 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

21. Ibid., 125.

22. Sanderson, , “Sudan Notes,” 164.Google Scholar

23. Ibid.

24. Najila, Hasan, Dhikrayati fi al-badiya (My Memoirs in the Desert), (Beirut, 1964), 83.Google Scholar

25. Jackson, H. C., Behind the Modern Sudan (London, 1955), 60.Google Scholar Emphasis in original.

26. Introduction, Tanganyika Notes and Records 1 (1936), 3.Google Scholar Although MacMichael was referring to the situation in Tanganyika, his remarks are no doubt true of the Sudan from whose service he had just retired.

27. Nicholls, , “Sakia,” 23.Google Scholar

28. Bond, W. R. G., “Rotation of Crops in Gum Gardens of the White Nile,” SNR 1 (1918), 80–87Google Scholar; Daly, M. W., British Administration and the Northern Sudan, 1917-1924: The Governor-Generalship of Sir Lee Stack in the Sudan, (Istanbul, 1980), 42–43.Google Scholar

29. Edwards, F. A., “The Foundation of Khartoum,” SNR 5 (1922), 162.Google Scholar

30. MacMichael, H. A., “Old Khartoum,” SNR 6 (1923), 110.Google Scholar

31. Hillelson, S., Sudan Arabic English-Arabic Vocabulary (2d ed.: London, 1930), v.Google Scholar

32. Ibid.

33. Davies, , Camel's Back, 1.Google Scholar

34. Reviews, SNR 3(1920), 282.Google Scholar

35. Wingate, “Foreword.”

36. Sanderson, , “Sudan Notes,” 164.Google Scholar

37. For the function of the civil secretary in the Sudan government see Warburg, , Sudan, 63Google Scholar

38. Editorial, SNR 3 (1922), 76.Google Scholar

39. For details on political development in Egypt and the Sudan during this period see Ibrahim, Hasan A., The 1936-Anglo-Egyptian Treaty (Khartoum, 1976), 13Google Scholar; Abdel Rahim, “Early Sudanese.”

40. Daly, M. W., Empire on the Nile: The Anglo-Egyptian Sudan, 1898-1934, (Cambridge, 1986), 360.Google Scholar

41. See Najila, , Malamih, 24–25Google Scholar; Rahim, M. Abdel, “The Development of British Policy in the Southern Sudan 1899-1947,” Middle Eastern Studies 2 (1966), 235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

42. Najila, , Malamih, 24–25.Google Scholar

43. Editorial Notes, SNR 3 (1920), 76.Google Scholar

44. Ibrahim, , “Mahdist,” 458Google Scholar; Daly, , British Administration, 110–11Google Scholar; Beshir, Revolution, chapter 3.

45. Daly, , British Administration, 153ff.Google Scholar; Rahim, Abdel, “Early Sudanese,” 49Google Scholar; Beshir, , Revolution, 72–73Google Scholar;

46. Times, 19 January 1925, 12.

47. Editorial, SNR 7 (1925), i.Google Scholar

48. SNR 8 (1925,) v–vi.Google Scholar

49. Ibid.; Hill, R., A Biographical Dictionary of the Anglo-Egyptian Sudan (Oxford, 1951), 350.Google Scholar

50. Ali, Sheikh Jaafar, “Notes on the Halenga Tribe,” SNR (1925), 180.Google Scholar

51. Fahil, Ibrahim, “The Nahas of the Kababish,” SNR 11 (1928), 213.Google Scholar For the history of the Kababish as a ‘tribe’ see Asad, Talal, “A Note on the History of the Kababish Tribe,” SNR 47 (1966), 79–87.Google Scholar

52. Fahil, , “Nahas,” 214.Google Scholar

53. Ibid., with emphasis added.

54. From a Lecture on “Arabs in the Sudan; Effect of Non-interference,” by MacMichael, H. A., Times, 23 July 1928, 19.Google Scholar

55. Sanderson, , “Sudan Notes,” 164.Google Scholar

56. SNR 9 (1926), 130.Google Scholar The tone of this editorial suggests that it was written immediately or shortly after Crowfoot's retirement.

57. Ibid.

58. Ibid.

59. SNR 5 (1922), 64.Google Scholar

60. Ibrahim, , “Mahdist,” 469–70Google Scholar; Times, 23 July 1928, 19.

61. Sanderson, , “Sudan Notes,” 165.Google Scholar

62. SNR 5 (1922), 62.Google Scholar

63. Sanderson, , “Sudan Notes,” 165.Google Scholar

64. For details on these incidents see Collins, Robert O., “The Aliab Dinka Uprising and Its suppression,” SNR 48 (1967), 77.Google Scholar See also SNR 11 (1928), 241Google Scholar; Times, 17 December 1927, 12.

65. Jackson, , Behind the Modern Sudan, 70.Google Scholar

66. Ibid.

67. Uganda Journal 1 (1934), 159.Google Scholar

68. Uganda Journal 1 (1934), 165–66.Google Scholar

69. According to Rahim, Abdel, “Development,” 238Google Scholar, education in the southern Sudan had until then been entirely the concern of missionary societies.

70. Struck, Bernhard, “A Bibliography of the Languages of the Southern Sudan,” SNR 11 (1928), 217.Google Scholar

71. Tanganyika Notes and Records 1 (1936), 4.Google Scholar

72. SNR 22 (1939), iGoogle Scholar; Henderson, K. D. D., The Making of the Modern Sudan: The Life and Letters of Sir Douglas Newbold, K. B. E. (London, 1953), 79–80.Google Scholar

73. See, for example, table of contents, SNR 21 (1938), 22 (1939).Google Scholar

74. Henderson, , Making, 547ff.Google Scholar

75. Ibid., 496-97.

76. Ibid., 497.

77. Ibid., 498.

78. Ibid.

79. Ibid., 498-99. Emphasis in original.

80. Ibid.

81. Ibid., 133. Emphasis in original.

82. Ibid., 500.

83. Ibid.

84. Editorial Notes, SNR 23 (1940), 1Google Scholar; Notice to Subscribers, SNR 24 (1941), 1.Google Scholar

85. Ibid.

86. “The Eboué Memoranda of 1941,” SNR 25 (1943), 1.Google Scholar

87. Ibid., 2.

88. Henderson, , Making, 359.Google Scholar

89. Editorial Notes, SNR 26 (1945), 1.Google Scholar

90. Ibid., 2; also see Henderson, , Making, xxv.Google Scholar For the attitude of Newbold toward Sudanese nationalism in the political arena in general, and the question of the National Congress, see Daly, W. M., The Imperial Sudan (Cambridge, 1991).Google Scholar

91. Editorial Notes, SNR 26 (1945), 200.Google Scholar

92. Ibid., 199-200.

93. Ibid.

94. Editorial Notes, SNR 27 (1946), 1.Google Scholar

95. Ibid.

96. Ibid.

97. Editorial notes, SNR 28 (1947), vi.Google Scholar

98. Editorial Notes, SNR 27 (1946), 3.Google Scholar

99. Editorial Notes, SNR 26 (1945), 3.Google Scholar

100. E.g., el-Rahim, M. Abd, Imperialism and Nationalism in the Sudan (Oxford, 1969), 14–15.Google Scholar

101. Warburg, Gabriel, Historical Discord in the Nile Valley (Evanston, 1992), 26.Google Scholar

102. Ibid, 29.

103. See Shukri, Muhammad Fu'ad, al-Hukm al-misri fi al-sudan (Cairo, 1947), 4.Google Scholar

104. Ibid.

105. Warburg, , Historical Discord, 29.Google Scholar

106. For a refutation of these claims see Ibrahim, Hasan A., Muhammad ʿAli fi al-Sudan (Khartoum, n.d.), 34ff.Google Scholar

107. See Mahgoub, , Democracy, 43–44.Google Scholar

108. Editorial Notes, SNR 28 (1947), vii.Google Scholar

109. Ibid.

110. Editorial Notes, SNR 27 (1946), 3.Google Scholar

111. Editorial Notes, SNR 26 (1945), 201.Google Scholar

112. SNR 29 (1948), 132.Google Scholar

113. Ibid., 133.

114. Editorial Notes, SNR 29 (1948), iv.Google Scholar

115. Ibid., iii.

116. Ibid.

117. Editorial Notes, SNR 29 (1948), iii.Google Scholar

118. Ibid.

119. Ibid.

120. Ibid., iv

121. Ibid.

122. Ibid.

123. Ibid.

124. Editorial Notes, SNR 35 (1954), 5.Google Scholar

125. Ibid.

126. Ibid., 5-6.

127. Editorial Notes, Kush 3 (1955), 3Google Scholar; Editorial Notes, Kush 4 (1956),Google Scholar