Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T23:53:01.857Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Collector's Unconscious: Innocence and Culpability in Field Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2014

Rachel Hoffman*
Affiliation:
National Museum of Mali, Fowler Museum of Cultural History

Extract

During February of 1987 the National Museum of Mali in Bamako and the Fowler Museum of Cultural History at UCLA began a collaborative project to study and document social institutions that support weaving and associated technologies in Mali, and to collect examples of locally-produced textiles for each of the two museums. Claude Daniel Ardouin, Director of the National Museum of Mali until 1987, defined a textiles collection project as part of what he conceived to be the National Museum's mandate to protect Mali's cultural heritage, a heritage in which the production of textiles plays a significant role. Ardouin quite literally reinvented Mali's National Museum as an actively archival institution, believing it to be essential and instrumental in conserving the country's rich artistic traditions. Toward this end, in 1986 Ardouin and Philip L. Ravenhill, then Director of the West African Museums Project, began discussions with Doran H. Ross, Deputy Director of the Fowler Museum of Cultural History, about collaborative, long-term research. Resources and expenses would be shared, resulting in a mutually enriching collaboration.

Early 1987 marked the first field season of the partnership that developed out of that early meeting. By 1991, under the joint auspices of Ross and Samuel Sidibe, present Director of the National Museum of Mali, the collaboration had completed the projected five field seasons of textiles documentation and collection covering five regions of Mali. This paper addresses some practical aspects of this extended, institutionally sponsored, collaborative fieldwork. It also discusses the collaborative project under the sometimes harsh light of postcolonial self-examination.

Type
Sources and Resources for the Study of African Material Culture
Copyright
Copyright © African Studies Association 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Clifford, James. 1988. The Predicament of Culture: Twentieth-Century Ethnography, Literature, and Art. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Dwyer, Kevin. 1977. “On the Dialogic of Fieldwork.” Dialectical Anthropology 2:143–51.Google Scholar
Dwyer, Kevin. 1979. “The Dialogic of Ethnology.” Dialectical Anthropology 4:205–24;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabian, Johannes. 1983. Time and The Other: How Anthropology Makes Its Object. New York.Google Scholar
Foster, Hal. 1985. Recodings: Art, Spectacle, Cultural Politics. Port Townsend, WA.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1968. “Thinking as a Moral Act: Ethical Dimensions of Anthropological Fieldwork,” Antioch Review 28:154–55.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, Eric and Ranger, Terence, eds. 1983. The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kaviraj, Sudipta. 1978. “How Not to Study Method: A Critical Note on Positivist Teaching of Methodology” in Kaviraj, et al.The State of Political Theory: Some Marxist Essays. Calcutta, 1415.Google Scholar
Price, Richard and Price, Sally. 1992. Equatoria. New York.Google Scholar
Rabinow, Paul. 1985. “Discourse and Power: On the Limits of Ethnographic Texts.” Dialectical Anthropology 10:113.Google Scholar
Said, Edward. 1978. Orientalism. New York.Google Scholar
Said, Edward. 1989. “Representing the Colonized: Anthropology's Interlocutors,” Critical Inquiry. Winter.Google Scholar