Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T16:54:04.924Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Strategic and Socio-Economic Explanations for Carnarvon's South African Confederation Policy: the Historiography and the Evidence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2014

R.L. Cope
R.L. Cope*
Affiliation:
University of the Witwatersrand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Although Carnarvon's attempt to unite South Africa in the 1870s was a failure, the forward movement represented by his “confederation policy” marks an important turning point in South African history. The destruction of the Zulu and the Pedi polities, which resulted directly from the confederation scheme, together with the last Cape frontier war and a rash of smaller conflicts, constituted the virtual end of organized black resistance in the nineteenth century and the beginning of untrammelled white supremacy. Britain's annexation of the Transvaal in 1877, which Carnarvon had hoped would be the decisive move towards confederation, instead set the scene for the conflict between Boer and Briton which dominated the history of the last two decades of the nineteenth century in South Africa.

Carnarvon's confederation scheme had important effects, but there is little agreement on its causes. The author of the standard work on the subject, Clement Goodfellow, took the view that Carnarvon's interest in South Africa arose essentially from its strategic importance within the empire as a whole. The Cape lay athwart the vital sea-route to Britain's eastern possessions, and confederation was designed, in Goodfellow's words, “to erect from the chaos of the subcontinent a strong, self-governing, and above all loyal Dominion behind the essential bastion at Simon's Bay.” This view, or some variant of it, sometimes with “Simonstown” or “Cape Town” or “the naval bases” or “the Cape peninsula” substituted for “Simon's Bay,” has been widely accepted and now appears as a matter of fact in the most recent and widely used general accounts of South African history.

Type
Research Article
Information
History in Africa , Volume 13 , 1986 , pp. 13 - 34
Copyright
Copyright © African Studies Association 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1. Goodfellow, C.F., Great Britain and South African Confederation 1870-1881 (Cape Town, 1966), 70.Google Scholar

2. E.g., Wilson, M. and Thompson, L.M., eds., The Oxford History of South Africa, II (Oxford, 1971), 290–92Google Scholar; Davenport, T.R.H., South Africa, A Modern History (Johannesburg, 1984), 128.Google Scholar This view has also found its way into a widely–used school text book: Boyce, A.N., Europe and South Africa, Part I: A History for Std. 9 (11th imp., Cape Town, 1981), 134–35.Google Scholar

3. Atmore, Anthony and Marks, Shula, “The Imperial Factor in South Africa in the Nineteenth Century: Towards a Reassessment,” Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, 3 (1974), 105–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4. Etherington, N.A., “Labour Supply and the Genesis of South African Confederation in the 1870s,” JAH, 20 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Guy, Jeff, The Destruction of the Zulu Kingdom; The Civil War in Zululand, 1879-1884 (London, 1979), 45Google Scholar; Bonner, Philip, Kings, Commoners and Concessionaires; The Evolution and Dissolution of the Nineteenth-Century Swazi State (Johannesburg, 1983), 133CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Delius, Peter, The Land Belongs to Us; The Pedi Polity, the Boers and the British in the Nineteenth Century Transvaal (Johannesburg, 1983), 217–20.Google Scholar

5. Benyon, John A., Proconsul and Paramountcy in South Africa; The High Commission, British Supremacy and the Sub-Continent, 1806-1910 (Pietermaritzburg, 1980), 142Google Scholar; Schreuder, Deryk M., The Scramble for Southern Africa, 1877-1895 (Cambridge, 1980), 18–22.Google Scholar

6. Atmore, /Marks, , “Imperial Factor,” 124.Google Scholar

7. H.L. Deb., 3rd ser., CCXXXIII (23 April 1877) 1651.

8. B.L. Add. Mss. 60792, Herbert to Carnarvon, 11 Feb. [1876].

9. CO. 879/9, African no 84, Memorandum on South African Affairs, by E[dward] F[airfield], Jan. 1876. This memorandum also discusses the diamond fields dispute, and the history of Carnarvon's attempts to that date to bring about confederation. The reasons for confederation will be found on pp. 5-9, from which all quotations in this paper are taken.

10. C. 1244, 1, Carnarvon to Barkly, 4 May 1875.

11. C.O. 879/10, African no 102, 3, Conference on South African Affairs, Carnarvon's opening speech, 3 Aug. 1876.

12. H.L. Deb., 3rd ser., CCXXV (23 July 1875) 1896.

13. H.L. Deb., 3rd ser., CCXXIII (12 April 1875) 693.

14. Carnarvon, Henry Howard Molyneux Herbert, 4th Earl of, ed. Herbert, Robert, Speeches on the Affairs of West Africa and South Africa (London, 1903), 315Google Scholar (reply to deputation on his retirement, 6 March 1878).

15. H.L. Deb., 3rd ser., CCCXXXIII (23 April 1877) 1651.

16. C.O. 879/10, African no 102, 3, Conference on South African Affairs, Carnarvon's opening speech, 3 Aug. 1876.

17. Ibid., 4.

18. Carnarvon, , Speeches, 242Google Scholar (speech at banquet in honor of Sir Bartle Frere on his departure for the Cape).

19. P.R.0. 30/6/84, p. 37, Carnarvon to Froude, 2 Sept. 1875.

20. H.L. Deb., 3rd ser., CCXXXIII (23 April 1877) 1658.

21. Goodfellow, , Great Britain, 70Google Scholar, in fact misrepresents Fairfield (p. 6). Fairfield wrote “It was, then primarily, [, with a view to lay the foundation of a sound system of self-protection against native danger, and] to shift the burden of that protection on the right shoulders, that Lord Carnarvon moved in the question of confederation.” Goodfellow omits the portion I have placed in square brackets, thus making it appear that shifting the burden was the primary aim.

22. Goodfellow, , Great Britain, 210.Google Scholar

23. E.g., see ibid., 71.

24. Ibid., 210.

25. Ibid., ix; the volume is P.R.O. 30/6/84. The originals were not destroyed, as Goodfellow supposed; they are now in the Carnarvon Papers in the British Library, in a bound volume, Add. Mss. 60798, which also contains the previously inaccessible correspondence between Carnarvon and Froude during the latter's first visit to South Africa in 1874. The two sets of letters require some disentangling, since Froude dated his letters only by the day and month, and whoever bound and indexed them (not the staff of the British Library) was evidently unaware that he had paid two visits to South Africa and consequently mixed them up together in a single sequence.

26. Goodfellow, , Great Britain, ix.Google Scholar

27. P.R.O. 30/6/49, Froude to Herbert, 9 July [1874]; B.L. Add. Mss. 60798, nos 6 and 56, Froude to Carnarvon, 8 July and 11 Oct. [1874]; Froude, J.A., Short Studies on Great Subjects, third series, (London, 1877), 493, 507.Google Scholar

28. P.R.O. 30/6/43, Froude to Carnarvon, 10 April [1877]; B.L. Add. Mss. 60798, nos 65 and 66, Froude to Carnarvon, 19 Nov. and 1 Dec. [1874]; B.L. Add. Mss. 60799A, Froude to Carnarvon, 15 Jan. [1878] and 3 March [1879]; Froude to Burgers, 12 March 1877, in Engelbrecht, S.P., Thomas Francois Burgers, a Biography (Pretoria, 1946), 137Google Scholar; Froude, , Short Studies, 528.Google Scholar

29. B.L. Add. Mss. 60798, nos 104 and 111, Froude to Carnarvon, 27 Sept. and 21 Nov. [1876].

30. B.L. Add. Mss. 60798, nos 66, 93 and 95, Froude to Carnarvon, 1 Dec. [1874], 5 July [1876] and Sunday [16 July 1876].

31. B.L. Add. Mss. 60798, no 65, Froude to Carnarvon, 19 Nov. [1874]; Froude, , Short Studies, 530–31, 518.Google Scholar See also the discussion of Froude's opinions in this period in Bodelson, Carl, Studies in Mid-Victorian Imperialism (Copenhagen, 1924), 176–86.Google Scholar

32. B.L. Add. Mss. 60798, no 76, Froude to Carnarvon, 9 Jan. [1876]; C.O. 48/478, Froude's comments, 10 June 1876, on Barkly to Carnarvon, 27 March 1876.

33. Goodfellow, , Great Britain, 3–74.Google Scholar

34. P.R.O. 30/6/84, 11, 35, 49, Froude to Carnarvon, 22 June, 29 July, 10 Sept. 1875.

35. Ibid., 26, Froude to Carnarvon, 8 July 1875.

36. Ibid., 81, Froude to Carnarvon, 24 Oct. 1875.

37. Ibid., 57, Froude to Carnarvon, 19 Sept. 1875.

38. B.L. Add. Mss. 60798, no 104, Froude to Carnarvon, 27 Sept. [1876]. Emphasis in original.

39. Ibid., no 106, Carnarvon to Froude, 16 Oct. 1876. Carnarvon had attempted to acquire Delagoa Bay for Britain, without success, not for the purpose of establishing a naval base there, but because the South African Republic hoped to retain its economic and hence political independence bybuilding a railway to this Portuguese possession. The annexation of the Transvaal solved this Delagoa Bay question by rendering it unimportant. “Nor indeed do I care so much for Delagoa Bay now that I have got the Transvaal” – P.R.O. 30/67/45, no. 147, Carnarvon to Morier, 2 July 1877.

40. B.L. Add. Mss. 60798, no 111, Froude to Carnarvon, 21 Nov. [1876]. Emphasis in original.

41. Ibid., no 110, Froude to Carnarvon, 24 Oct. [1876].

42. P.R.O. 30/6/3, no 51, Carnarvon to Ponsonby, 3 Oct. 1876.

43. Robinson, Ronald E. and Gallagher, John, with Denny, Alice, Africa and the Victorians; the Official Mind of Imperialism (London, 1961).Google Scholar

44. Ibid., 59–60.

45. Ibid., 60nn2–3.

46. The references are to Martineau, John, The Life and Correspondence of Sir Bartle Frere (2 vols.: London, 1895) 2: 259, 370.Google Scholar

47. Ibid., 2: 371.

48. Stengers, Jean, “L'impérialisme colonial de la fin du XIXe siècle: mythe ou réalite,” JAH, 3 (1962), 469–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar (An English translation of this minus footnotes is in P.J.M., McEwan, ed., Nineteenth Century Africa [London, 1968], 267–92)Google Scholar; Hyam, Ronald, “The Partition of Africa,” Historical Journal, 7 (1964), 154–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Shepperson, George, “Africa, the Victorians, and Imperialism,” Revue Belge de Philologie et d'Histoire, 40 (1962), 1228–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar (reprinted in slightly abridged form in W.R., Louis, ed., Imperialism; the Robinson and Gallagher Controversy [New York, 1976], 162–73)Google Scholar; Stokes, Eric, Imperialism and the Scramble for Africa: The New View [Historical Association of Rhodesia and Nyasaland pamphlet, 1963] (reprinted in Louis, Imperialism, 173–95).Google Scholar See also Platt, D.C.M., “Economic Factors in British Policy During the ‘New Imperialism’,” Past and Present, no. 39 (1968), 120–29.Google Scholar

49. Newbury, C.W., “Victorians, Republicans, and the Partition of West Africa,”; JAH, 3 (1962), 493–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Chamberlain, M.E., “Clement Hill's Memoranda and the British Interest in East Africa,” English Historical Review, 87 (1972), 533–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

50. Kennedy, P.M., “The Theory and Practice of Imperialism,” Historical Journal, 20 (1977), 766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

51. On Gallagher's militant anti-Marxism see Kiernan, V.G., “The Imperial Laocoon,” Times Literary Supplement (7 January 1983), 16.Google Scholar Robinson refers to their “finding themselves in an ethical quandary between Coupland and Perham's moralization and Hobsonian and neo-Marxist denunciation of British imperialism” in Madden, Frederic W. and Fieldhouse, David K., eds., Oxford and the Idea of Commonwealth (London, 1982), 45.Google Scholar See also the second edition of Africa and the Victorians (London, 1981), xiii.Google Scholar In this second edition, the text has been left unaltered on the grounds that it represents, not the authors' opinions, but those of the Victorians themselves, and thus stands beyond revision.” This extraordinary claim cannot be accepted; the book is very much a work of interpretation. Just how off-target much of the attack on “theories of economic imperialism” really is has been demonstrated by Etherington, Norman, Theories of Imperialism: War, Conquest and Capital (London, 1984)Google Scholar; see pp. 234-36 for a discussion of Robinson and Gallagher. On the changing reactions to Marx generally, see Hobsbawm, Eric, “Dr. Marx and the Victorian Critics” in his Labouring Men: Studies in the History of Labour (London, 1968), 239–49.Google Scholar

52. Robinson, R.E. and Gallagher, J., “The Partition of Africa,” chap. 22 of Hinsley, Francis H., ed., The New Cambridge Modern History XI (Cambridge, 1962), 633–39.Google Scholar They write (633): “Until the 1870's official London had been content to secure the Cape route through colonial control of the Cape and Natal, leaving the inland republics of the Trekboers in the Transvaal and the Orange Free State their ramshackle independence. But with the diamond discoveries at Kimberley and the beginnings of investment and railway-building, the British aim became specifically imperial, as it was not in Egypt or tropical Africa.” Thereafter the various attempts (including Carnarvon's confederation scheme) at maintaining British paramountcy in South Africa are discussed without further reference to naval bases or sea routes. The question of why Britain considered it important to maintain its paramountcy is not directly addressed, but anyone who had not read Africa and the Victorians would, I think, form the impression from this later account that it was for essentially economic reasons.

53. De Kiewiet, Cornelius W., The Imperial Factor in South Africa; A Study in Politics and Economics (Cambridge, 1937), 66.Google Scholar

54. Robinson, /Gallagher, , Africa and the Victorians, 60.Google Scholar

55. P.R.O. 30/6/49, 3.

56. My emphases.

57. Carnarvon, , Speeches, 447.Google Scholar

58. Schreuder, Deryck M., Gladstone and Kruger; Liberal Government and Colonial ‘Home Rule’ 1880-85 (London, 1969).Google Scholar

59. See above.

60. P.R.O. 30/6/49, 3, Herbert's comments, n.d., on Froude to Herbert, 9 July [1874].

61. Van Jaarsveld, Floris A., The Awakening of Afrikaner Nationalism (Cape Town, 1961), 104–05, 108–09, 121.Google Scholar

62. Schreuder, , Gladstone and Kruger, 245, 503.Google Scholar

63. Ibid., 304-05. See Schreuder's comments on the difference between the 1870s and the 1880s in this respect, ibid., 467-68.

64. Marais, Johannes S., The Fall of Kruger's Republic (Oxford, 1961), 329Google Scholar; Robinson, /Gallagher, , Africa and the Victorians, 410–411, 434–37, 454–55.Google Scholar

65. Robinson, /Gallagher, , Africa and the Victorians, 420, 461n.Google Scholar

66. Robinson, /Gallagher, , Africa and the Victorians, 434–37Google Scholar, quote a very long extract from an 1896 memorandum which they describe as “perhaps the best evidence of the fundamental considerations which inspired Chamberlain and Selborne henceforward.” It contains, however, no mention of naval bases or sea routes; so Robinson and Gallagher are reduced to adding (439): “Perhaps they argued in the Cabinet Defence Committee that a United States of South Africa would deprive Britain of the Cape Town naval base” (my emphasis).

67. Marais, , Fall of Kruger's Republic, 325, 329.Google Scholar

68. Robinson, /Gallagher, , Africa and the Victorians, 57nGoogle Scholar; Goodfellow, , Great Britain, 1–2.Google Scholar

69. Jaarsveld, Van, Awakening, 122–39Google Scholar; Delius, , The Land Belongs to Us, 126–57.Google Scholar

70. P.R.O. 30/6/52, Carnarvon to Simmons, 7 Feb. 1881.

71. Carnarvon to Frere, 11 Sept. 1877 in Hardinge, Arthur, The Life of Henry Howard Molyneux Herbert, Fourth Earl of Carnarvon, 1831-1890 (3 vols.: Oxford, 1925) 2: 289.Google Scholar

72. Standard Encyclopaedia of Southern Africa (12 vols.: Cape Town, 1970–1976), 9: 638.Google Scholar

73. P.R.O. 30/6/52, Carnarvon to Frere, 31 Oct. 1879, and to Simmons, 7 Feb. 1881.

74. Goodfellow, , Great Britain, 70, quoted above.Google Scholar

75. Rose, John H., Newton, Arthur P., Benians, Ernest A., eds., The Cambridge History of the British Empire (8 vols.: Cambridge, 1929–1959), 2: 591.Google Scholar

76. See above.

77. P.R.O. 30/6/32, no 11, Barkly to Carnarvon, 25 July 1874.

78. H.C. Deb., 3rd ser., CCXXXV (24 July 1877), 1755.

79. P.R.O. 30/6/49, Froude to Herbert, 9 July [1874], and Herbert's comments (n.d.) thereon.

80. Goodfellow, , Great Britain, 67–68, 80, 116–18.Google Scholar

81. Ibid., 72.

82. Ibid., 214.

83. Ibid., 210.

84. Ibid., 215.

85. Ibid., 216.