No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
God-State Idea in Modern Education∗
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 February 2017
Extract
This paper was written from the standpoint of three broad general assumptions: (1) that a study of the history of education has much to contribute to the upgrading of the quality of the profession of teaching; (2) that the future of education in the United States calls for a deeper sense of historical reality; and (3) that the root of much of our confusion in educational policy today is to be found in the area involving the quality of the relation between religion and politics. Dr. Robert Ulich has stated our problem quite well:
If in the dialectical nature of life, we want to have the advantages of organizations and of institutions, we will also have to cope with the disadvantages. Whether our organizations, especially our churches and states, will lead us toward greater freedom and a world-embracing outlook, or become more and more totalitarian will depend on the degree to which the human person is able to assert his self-transcending quality not only for and above, but even against the biggest institutions.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1963, University of Pittsburgh Press
References
Notes
1. Ulich, Robert, The Human Career (New York, 1955), 175.Google Scholar
2. Friedrich Hegel, George, Philosophy of History (New York, 1899), 54.Google Scholar
3. Grant, George P., Philosophy in the Mass Age (New York, 1960), 30.Google Scholar
4. Brubacher, John, A History of the Problems of Education (New York, 1947), 53.Google Scholar
5. Muller, Herbert J., The Uses of the Past (New York, 1952), 82.Google Scholar
6. Simmonds, Florence, Orpheus, a History of Religions (New York, 1930). 24.Google Scholar
7. Gerhart, Eugene C., American Liberty and “National Law” (Boston, 1953), 80.Google Scholar
8. Muller, 90.Google Scholar
9. Salo Baron, Wittmayer, Modern Nationalism and Religion (New York, 1947), 15–16.Google Scholar
10. Kahler, Erich, Man the Measure (New York, 1956), 377.Google Scholar
11. Chandler, Albert R., The Clash of Political Ideals (New York), 53.Google Scholar
12. Baron, , 28.Google Scholar
13. Ibid., 24.Google Scholar
14. The Logic of Hegel (translated by Wallace, W., 1892), 94.Google Scholar
15. Shafer, Boyd C., Nationalism, Interpreters and Interpretations (Washington, D. C., 1959), 9.Google Scholar
16. Meyer, Adolph E., The Development of Education in the Twentieth Century (New York, 1949), 250.Google Scholar
17. McGovern, William H., From Luther to Hitler: The History of Nazi-Fascist Political Philosophy (Boston, 1941), 275.Google Scholar
18. Bang, J. P., Hurrah and Hallelujah (New York, 1917), 34. (Excellent primary source material for the Protestant point of view.)Google Scholar
19. Ibid., 105–106.Google Scholar
20. Baron, , 146.Google Scholar
21. Ibid., 147.Google Scholar
22. Frederick Kneller, George. The Educational Philosophy of National Socialism (New Haven, 1941), 1.Google Scholar
23. Stuart Mill, John, Unitarianism, Liberty, Representative Government (Everyman Edition) (New York), 77.Google Scholar
24. Blanchard, Paul, God and Man in Washington (Boston, 1960), 13.Google Scholar
25. Baron, , 3.Google Scholar
26. Graham, Billy, “Our Right to Require Belief,” Saturday Evening Post (February 17, 1962), 8.Google Scholar
27. Ulich, Robert, “The Education of Nations.” The Educational Forum (Nov. 1946), 279–280.Google Scholar
28. Cook, Fred, The Warfare State (New York, 1962).Google Scholar
29. Laswell, Harold, National Security and Individual Freedom (New York. 1940), 48.Google Scholar
30. Nisbet, Robert A., The Quest for Community (New York, 1953). 11.Google Scholar
31. Gellerman, William, The American Legion as Educator (New York, 1938).Google Scholar
32. Christian Century (April 1957), 543.Google Scholar
33. Beale, Howard K., Are American Teachers Free (New York, 1936); Thayer, T., The Role of the School in American Society (New York, 1960); Blanchard, op. cit.Google Scholar
34. Thayer, , 353.Google Scholar
35. deJ. Pemberton, John Jr., “Freedom From Dissent,” 42nd Annual Report, American Civil Liberties Union (New York), 4.Google Scholar
36. Blanchard, , 119.Google Scholar
37. Congressional Digest, 39 (April 1960), 115, 117, 119.Google Scholar
38. Congressional Record, Vol. 108, No. 13, Tuesday (January 30, 1962), 1117 Google Scholar
39. Burlingame, Roger, The Sixth Column (New York, 1962): Sherwin, Mark, The Extremists (1962) are quite pessimistic about our future on this point.Google Scholar