No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Student Development Theory and the Transformation of Student Affairs in the 1970s
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 October 2023
Abstract
Student development theory (SDT) is a diverse corpus of academic and popular psychology with real-world application to the maturation of college and university students. It originated during the campus upheavals of the 1960s as part of a collective effort to reconcile restive students to mass higher education and modern technological society. Then, in the 1970s, SDT was implemented and refined by an ambitious generation of student affairs professionals eager for institutional influence and academic legitimacy. By providing an animating moral and intellectual purpose to the bureaucratic sundering of student affairs divisions from academic affairs divisions, SDT abetted a lasting institutional and cultural change in the organization of the modern university circa 1970. As a discourse of therapeutic empowerment, SDT has had an enduring influence on the daily practice of student affairs administration in the five decades since.
Keywords
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of History of Education Society.
References
1 On “meism” and other stereotypes, see Levine, Arthur, When Dreams and Heroes Died: A Portrait of Today’s College Student (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1980)Google Scholar.
2 Kerr, Clark, The Uses of the University (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1963)Google Scholar.
3 Lefkowitz Horowitz, Helen, Campus Life: Undergraduate Cultures from the End of the Eighteenth Century to the Present (New York: Knopf Doubleday, 1987), Google Scholar.
4 Carnegie Commission on Higher Education, Reform on Campus: Changing Students, Changing Academic Programs: A Report and Recommendations (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1972)Google Scholar; Heiss, Ann, An Inventory of Academic Innovation and Reform (New York: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 1973)Google Scholar.
5 For the “academic revolution” in higher education, see Jencks, Christopher and Riesman, David, The Academic Revolution (New York: Doubleday, 1968)Google Scholar.
6 For the “academic depression,” see Frank Cheit, Earl, The New Depression in Higher Education—Two Years Later (Berkeley, CA: Carnegie Commission on Higher Education, 1973), ERIC ED088360.Google Scholar
7 For one example of the pervasive use of this term, see Darby Roberts, “Academic and Student Affairs Sides of the House: Can We Have an Open Concept Learning Design?,” National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment, January 2017, https://www.learningoutcomesassessment.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Viewpoint-Roberts.pdf.
8 Thelin, John R., A History of American Higher Education (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2013), Google Scholar; Geiger, Roger, American Higher Education since World War II: A History (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2019), Google Scholar. In very much the same vein, see Schrecker, Ellen, The Lost Promise: American Universities in the 1960s (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2021)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
9 Loss, Christopher P., Between Citizens and the State: The Politics of American Higher Education in the 20th Century (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2012), 165–234Google Scholar.
10 Hevel, Michael S., “Toward a History of Student Affairs: A Synthesis of Research, 1996-2015,” Journal of College Student Development 57, no. 7 (Oct. 2016), CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Coomes, Michael D. and Gerda, Janice J., “‘A Long and Honorable History’: Student Affairs in the United States,” in The Handbook of Student Affairs Administration, ed. McClellan, George S., Stringer, Jeremy, and Associates, 4th ed. (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2016), 3–23Google Scholar.
11 Hevel, Michael S., “A Historiography of College Students 30 Years after Helen Horowitz’s Campus Life,” in Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, vol. 32, ed. Paulsen, Michael (New York: Springer 2017), Google Scholar. A few works on 1970s college life are discussed in Hevel, Michael S. and Jaeckle, Heidi, “Trends in the Historiography of American College Student Life: Populations, Organizations, and Behaviors,” in Rethinking Campus Life: New Perspectives on the History of College Students in the United States, ed. Ogren, Christine and Overbeke, Marc Van (New York: Springer, 2017), 11–36.Google Scholar
12 For one classic and one recent work within this large literature, see Birnbaum, Robert, How Colleges Work: The Cybernetics of Academic Organization and Leadership (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1988)Google Scholar; and Brint, Steven, Two Cheers for Higher Education: Why American Universities Are Stronger Than Ever—and How to Meet the Challenges They Face (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2018)Google Scholar.
13 Thelin, John R., Going to College in the Sixties (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2018), .Google Scholar
14 Reuben, Julie A., The Making of the Modern University: Intellectual Transformation and the Marginalization of Morality (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996), .Google Scholar
15 Rentz, Audrey, ed., Student Affairs: A Profession’s Heritage, 2nd ed. (Washington, DC: University Press of America, 1994)Google Scholar; Owens, Hilda, Charles Witten, and Bailey, Walter, eds., College Student Personnel Administration: An Anthology (Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas, 1982)Google Scholar; and Giroux, Roy et al., eds., College Student Development Revisited: Programs, Issues, and Practices (Washington, DC: American Personnel and Guidance Association, 1979)Google Scholar.
16 Everett Chandler, “Student Affairs Administration in Transition (1973),” in Rentz, Student Affairs, 396–405; Rhatigan, James J., “From the People Up: A Brief History of Student Affairs Administration,” in George, S. McClellan, Stringer, Jeremy, and Associates, The Handbook of Student Affairs Administration, 3rd. ed. (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2009), 3–18Google Scholar, with comments on female VPSAs on p. 14.
17 Burns Crookston and Glenn Atkyns, “A Study of Student Affairs: The Principal Student Affairs Officer, the Functions, the Organization at American Colleges and Universities 1967-1972. A Preliminary Summary Report. Technical Report No. 3,” April 15, 1974, ERIC ED095762, pp. 10–20.
18 Crookston and Atkyns, “Study of Student Affairs,” 22–31, 37–39. On the continuation of these trends into the early 1980s, see Johnny Wolfe, “A Study of Current Organizational Structures & the Perceived Impact of Selected Problems of Student Personnel Services in Selected Colleges & Universities,” (master’s thesis, Western Kentucky University, 1983), https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/theses/3011, 29–35.
19 Kirk, Barbara A., “Identity Crisis—1965 … ACPA Presidential Address (1965),” in Rentz, Student Affairs, .Google Scholar
20 E. G. Williamson, “Some Unresolved Problems in Student Personnel Work (1967),” in Rentz, Student Affairs, 229–34.
21 Elizabeth A. Greenleaf, “How Others See Us … ACPA Presidential Address (1968),” in Rentz, Student Affairs, 235–44.
22 McConnell, T. R., “Student Personnel Services - Central or Peripheral?,” NASPA Journal 8, no. 1 (1970), 55–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
23 Mary Evelyn Dewey, “The Student Personnel Worker of 1980 (1972),” in Rentz, Student Affairs, 303–9.
24 James F. Penney, “Student Personnel Work: A Profession Stillborn (1969),” in Rentz, Student Affairs, 249–56.
25 Prior, John J., “The Reorganization of Student Personnel Services: Facing Reality,” Journal of College Student Personnel 14 (May 1973), Google Scholar.
26 Ralph F. Berdie, “Student Personnel Work: Definition and Redefinition … ACPA Presidential Address (1966),” in Rentz, Student Affairs, 210-18. The quote is on p. 211.
27 Kate H. Mueller, “Three Dilemmas of the Student Personnel Profession and Their Resolution (1966),” in Rentz, Student Affairs, 219–28. The quote is on p. 222.
28 Philip A. Tripp, “Student Personnel Workers: Student Development Experts of the Future (1966),” in Rentz, Student Affairs, 245–48.
29 Allen E. Ivey and Weston H. Morrill, “Confrontation, Communication, and Encounter: A Conceptual Framework for Student Development (1969-70),” in Rentz, Student Affairs, 262–68.
30 Robert D. Brown, Student Development in Tomorrow’s Higher Education: A Return to the Academy (Washington, DC: American College Personnel Association, 1972), with quotes on pp. 13–15 (emphasis in original).
31 Brown, Student Development, 42. For context, see also pp. 8, 12, 24–26, 39–41, 46.
32 Alan M. Dahms and Bernard C. Kinnick, “Existentialism and Student Personnel Work (1969),” in Giroux et al., College Student Development Revisited, 40-45. The quote is on p. 43.
33 Clyde A. Parker, “Student Development: What Does it Mean? (1974),” in Rentz, Student Affairs, 406–20, at 419.
34 Knefelkamp, Lee, Widick, Carole, and Parker, Clyde A., Applying New Developmental Findings: New Directions for Student Services (Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 1978), Google Scholar.
35 Sanford, Nevitt, Where Colleges Fail: A Study of the Student as a Person (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1967), xv-xvi, CrossRefGoogle Scholar. The quotes are on pp. xvi, 8, and xv, respectively. Emphasis in original.
36 Chickering, Arthur W., Education and Identity (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1969), ix–xGoogle Scholar.
37 See Candon, Sarah, “The Evolution of Three Student Personnel Perspectives and Their Effect on Professional Preparation Programs” (EdD diss., Columbia University, 1981), 95–99Google Scholar, for comparisons among Erikson, Sanford, and Chickering.
38 See Chickering, Education and Identity, 145–57, on hypothesis-testing.
39 Miller, Theodore and Prince, Judith, The Future of Student Affairs (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1976)Google Scholar. See Candon, “Evolution,” 113–16, on this work’s place in the field.
40 Miller and Prince, Future of Student Affairs, 67.
41 Miller and Prince, Future of Student Affairs, 113–17 (Bowling Green), 76 (Virginia Commonwealth), 120 (Iowa State), 122 (Davis), 129–31 (Alverno), 45 (WICHE).
42 Miller and Prince, Future of Student Affairs, 46–71.
43 See Miller and Prince, Future of Student Affairs, 161, for a good example.
44 Miller, Theodore K., Winston, Roger B., and William, R. Mendenhall, eds., Administration and Leadership in Student Affairs: Actualizing Student Development in Higher Education (Muncie, IN: Accelerated Development Inc., 1983)Google Scholar.
45 Jencks and Riesman, Academic Revolution.
46 D. S. Carpenter, T. K. Miller, and R. B. Winston Jr., “Toward the Professionalization of Student Affairs (1980),” in Rentz, Student Affairs, 512–21.
47 Cheek, King V. Jr., “The Impact of National Trends in Higher Education,” NASPA Journal 13, no. 1 (1975), 25–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar. The quotes are on pp. 29 and 28, respectively.
48 Robert J. Nash, Kenneth P. Saurman, and George Sousa, “A Humanistic Direction for Student Personnel (1976),” in Rentz, Student Affairs, 460–73. The quote is on p. 465. Their rough ages were determined via a Google search on their professional profiles.
49 Cheek, “Impact,” 30.
50 James C. Hurst and Allen E. Ivey, “Towards a Radicalization of Student Personnel (1971),” in Rentz, Student Affairs, 284–90.
51 Robert J. Nash and Kenneth P. Saurman, “Learning to Earn Is Not Learning to Live: Student Development Educators as Meaning Makers,” in Owens et al., College Student Personnel Administration, 84–99. The quote is on p. 94.
52 Nash and Saurman, “Learning to Earn,” 98.
53 Nash and Saurman, “Learning to Earn,” 84–99, especially 94, 97–98.
54 Wilner, Daniel et al., The Ecosystem Model: Designing Campus Environments (Boulder, CO: Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education, 1973), 5–19Google Scholar, with quotations on p. 6.
55 James, H. Banning, ed., Campus Ecology: A Perspective for Student Affairs (Cincinnati: National Association of Student Personnel Administrators, 1978), Google Scholar.
56 Banning, Campus Ecology. The quotes are on pp. 20 and 19, respectively.
57 Banning, Campus Ecology, 40–43.
58 Burns B. Crookston, “Milieu Management (1975),” in Rentz, Student Affairs, 448–59.
59 Cheit, Earl F., The New Depression in Higher Education: A Study of Financial Conditions at 41 Colleges and Universities (New York: McGraw Hill, 1971)Google Scholar; Bowen, William G., The Economics of Major Private Universities (Berkeley, CA: Carnegie Commission on Higher Education, 1968)Google Scholar.
60 Harvey, James, “Administration by Objectives in Student Personnel Programs,” Journal of College Student Personnel 13, no. 4 (July 1972), Google Scholar; Candon, “Evolution,” 134-36.
61 Sims, O. Suthern Jr. and Kozoll, Charles E., “A Case for Management by Objectives for Student Development Services,” NASPA Journal 12, no. 1 (1974), 44–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
62 Deegan, Arthur and Fritz, Roger, MBO Goes to College: Management by Objectives (Boulder: University of Colorado, 1975)Google Scholar.
63 Saurman, Kenneth B. and Nash, Robert J., “MBO, Student Development and Accountability: A Critical Look,” NASPA Journal 12, no. 3 (1975), CrossRefGoogle Scholar. The quote is on p. 179.
64 Saurman and Nash, “MBO, Student Development and Accountability,” 184.
65 Saurman and Nash, “MBO, Student Development and Accountability,” 180–81.
66 Saurman and Nash, “MBO, Student Development and Accountability.” The quotes are on pp. 183 and 187, respectively.
67 Saurman and Nash, “MBO, Student Development and Accountability,” 187.
68 David T. Borland, “Aggressive Neglect, Matrix Organization, and Student Development Implementation (1977),” in Giroux et al., College Student Development Revisited, 198–207.
69 McHenry, Dean, “Academic Organizational Matrix at the University of California, Santa Cruz,” in Academic Departments: Problems, Variations, and Alternatives, ed. McHenry (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1977), Google Scholar; Muhll, George von der, “The University of California at Santa Cruz: Institutionalizing Eden in a Changing World,” in Against the Current: Reform and Experimentation in Higher Education, ed. Jones, Richard M. and Smith, Barbara L. (Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Publishing Company, 1984), 51–92.Google Scholar
70 Appleton, James R., Moore, Paul L., and Vinton, John C., “A Model for the Effective Delivery of Student Services in Academic Schools and Departments,” Journal of Higher Education 49, no. 4 (Jul.-Aug. 1978), CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
71 Lipsetz, Alvin H., “Student Personnel Work and Organization Development,” NASPA Journal 11, no. 2 (1973), 36–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar; see also Burns B. Crookston, “An Organizational Model for Student Development (1972),” in Rentz, Student Affairs, 291–302; and Birnbaum, Robert, Management Fads in Higher Education: Where They Come From, What They Do, Why They Fail (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2000)Google Scholar.
72 Terry O’Banion, Alice Thurston, and James Gulden, “Student Personnel Work: An Emerging Model (1970),” in Rentz, Student Affairs, 269–83. The quote is on p. 275.
73 Two other touchstones on the New Students are Newman, Frank et al., Report on Higher Education (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1971)Google Scholar; and Carnegie Commission on Higher Education, New Students and New Places: Policies for the Future Growth and Development of American Higher Education (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971)Google Scholar.
74 Cross drew from the findings in Binzen’s Carnegie-funded study, P., “The World of Whitetown: Neglected Blue-Collar Communities,” Carnegie Quarterly 18, no. 4 (Fall 1970), 1–3Google Scholar. See references to Binzen’s article in Patricia Cross, K., “New Students and New Needs in Higher Education,” Center for Research and Development in Higher Education (US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Washington, DC, 1972), ERIC ED061909Google Scholar.
75 Patricia Cross, K., Beyond the Open Door: New Students in Higher Education (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1971), 13–16Google Scholar. The quote is on p. 159.
76 Cross, Beyond the Open Door, 16.
77 K. Patricia Cross, “Our Changing Students and Their Impact on Colleges: Prospects for a True Learning Society (1980),” in Owens et al., College Student Personnel Administration, 132–42.
78 Knefelkamp, Widick, and Parker, Applying New Developmental Findings, 110–11.
79 L. Lee Knefelkamp, “Faculty and Student Development in the 80’s: Renewing the Community of Scholars (1980),” in Owens et al., College Student Personnel Administration, 373–91.
80 Rees Hughes, “The Non-traditional Student in Higher Education: A Synthesis of the Literature (1983),” in Rentz, Student Affairs, 575–92.
81 Adrienne Barna, James R. Haws, and Lee Knefelkamp, “New Students: Challenge to Student Affairs (1978),” in Owens et al., College Student Personnel Administration, 123–31. The quotation is on p. 129.
82 Patricia Cross, K., “Student Personnel Work as a Profession,” Journal of College Student Personnel 14, no. 1 (Jan. 1973), 77–81Google Scholar. The quotes are on pp. 78 and 81.
83 James J. Rhatigan, “Student Services vs. Student Development: Is There a Difference? (1975),” in Rentz, Student Affairs, 438–47.
84 Hurst, James C. et al., “Reorganizing for Human Development in Higher Education: Obstacles to Change,” Journal of College Student Personnel 14, no. 1 (Jan. 1973), 10–15.Google Scholar
85 Plato, Kathleen C., “Student Development as Policy: Strategies for Implementation,” Journal of College Student Personnel 18, no. 6 (Nov. 1977), Google Scholar.
86 Plato, Kathleen C., “The Shift to Student Development: An Analysis of the Patterns of Change,” NASPA Journal 15, no. 4 (1978), 32–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar The quotations are on pp. 33, 34, and 32, respectively.
87 Deegan, William L., Managing Student Affairs Programs: Methods, Models, Muddles (Palm Springs, CA: ETC Publications, 1981), Google Scholar.
88 Marvalene S. Hughes, “Feminization of Student Affairs (1989),” in Rentz, Student Affairs, 660-73.
89 Hughes, “Feminization.” The quotes are on pp. 661 and 663, respectively.
90 Hughes, “Feminization.” The quotes are on pp. 661 and 670, respectively.
91 Bloland, Paul A., Stamatakos, Louis C., and Rogers, Russell R., Reform in Student Affairs: A Critique of Student Development (Greensboro, NC: ERIC Clearinghouse, 1994), .Google Scholar
92 Bloland, Stamatakos, and Rogers, 7–13, 28–33, 80–87. The quote is on p. 7.
93 Kuh, George D., Whitt, Elizabeth J., and Shedd, Jill D., Student Affairs Work, 2001: A Paradigmatic Odyssey (Alexandria, VA: American College Personnel Association, 1987), Google Scholar.
94 Delworth, Ursula and Hanson, Gary R., Student Services: A Handbook for the Profession (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1980)Google Scholar, now on its fifth edition (2011).
95 Magolda, Peter M. and Baxter Magolda, Marcia B., Contested Issues in Student Affairs: Diverse Perspectives and Respectful Dialogue (Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing, 2011)Google Scholar.
96 Patton, Lori D. et al., Student Development in College: Theory, Research, and Practice (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2016)Google Scholar.
97 Torres, Vasti, Jones, Susan R., and Renn, Kristen, “Student Affairs as a Low-Consensus Field and the Evolution of Student Development Theory as Foundational Knowledge,” Journal of College Student Development 60, no. 6 (Nov.-Dec. 2019), CrossRefGoogle Scholar.