Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T12:57:06.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Peircean Approach to Trinity as Community: A Response to Some Responses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2014

Donald L. Gelpi
Donald L. Gelpi*
Affiliation:
Jesuit School of Theology at Berkeley
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article, the author responds to several recent scholarly criticisms of his book The Divine Mother: A Trinitarian Theology of the Holy Spirit. In responding to these objections, he argues that, by invoking the logic and metaphysics of Charles Sanders Peirce in rethinking the foundations of trinitarian theology, he has formulated a theological construct of the trinity as community, which differs substantively from the efforts of other contemporary theologians to do the same, while at the same time avoiding inadequacies present in their constructs.

Type
Editorial Essay
Information
Horizons , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , Spring 2000 , pp. 114 - 130
Copyright
Copyright © The College Theology Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 O'Donnell, John S.J., “The Trinity as Divine Community: A Critical Reflection upon Recent Theological Developments,” Gregorianum 69 (1988):5–34.Google Scholar

2 Neville, Robert Cummings, The High Road around Modernism (Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 1992).Google Scholar

3 Whitehead, Alfred North, Process and Reality, ed. Griffin, David Ray and Sherbourne, Donald (New York: Free Press, 1978), 29.Google Scholar

4 Ibid., 167.

5 Ibid., 30, 50, 75, 79, 137, 156.

6 Ibid., 3.

7 Gelpi, Donald L. S.J., The Turn to Experience in Contemporary Theology (NY: Paulist, 1994), 52–89.Google Scholar

8 Whitehead, , Process and Reality, 9.Google Scholar

9 Peirce, Charles Sanders, Collected Papers, ed. Hartshorne, Charles, Weiss, Paul, and Banks, Arthur W. (8 vols; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1931–1958), 5:180–212.Google Scholar

10 Ibid.

11 See Bracken, Joseph A. S.J. and Suchocki, Marjorie Hewitt, eds., Trinity in Process: A Relational Theology of God (New York: Continuum, 1997).Google Scholar

12 Gelpi, , The Turn to Experience in Contemporary Theology, 69–84.Google Scholar

13 Ibid., 63-64.

14 Peirce, , Collected Papers,, 6:287–316.Google Scholar

15 Ibid., 6:271, 287-317.

16 Bracken, Joseph S.J., “Pantheism from a Trinitarian Perspective,” Horizons 22/1 (1995): 20, n. 34CrossRefGoogle Scholar

17 Whitehead, , Process and Reality, 98.Google Scholar

18 Pepper, Stephen C., World Hypotheses: A Study in Evidences (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1942).Google Scholar

19 Peirce, , Collected Papers, 6:7–34.Google Scholar

20 Bracken, , “Panentheism from a Trinitarian Perspective,” 19, n. 33.Google Scholar

21 Neumann, Erich, The Great Mother: An Analysis of the Archetype (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1968).Google Scholar

22 LaCugna, Catherine Mowry, The Trinitarian Mystery of God (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress, 1991), 183.Google Scholar

23 Ibid.

24 Ibid

25 Johnson, Elizabeth A., She Who Is The Mystery of God in Feminist Theological Discourse (New YorkCrossroad, 1992), 33.Google Scholar

26 Peirce, , Collected Papers 5:388–410, 6:452–593.Google Scholar