Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qlrfm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T16:22:46.264Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

In Defense of Femininity: Commentary on Sandra Bartky's Femininity and Domination

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Patrocinio P. Schweickart
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

According to Bartky, “To be a feminist, one has first to become one,” and to become a feminist, one has to overcome femininity. Although I agree with Bartky's critique of femininity, I argue that feminist consciousness has to involve a contradictory attitude toward femininity—not just a critique, but also an appreciation of the Utopian values it harbors.

Type
Symposium
Information
Hypatia , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , Winter 1993 , pp. 178 - 191
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alcoff, Linda. 1988. Cultural feminism versus post‐structuralism: The identity crisis in feminist theory. Signs 13 (3): 405–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Association of University Women. 1992. How schools shortchange girls: Executive summary. AAUW Outlook 86 (1).Google Scholar
Bardige, Betty. 1988. Things so finely human: Moral sensibilities at risk in adolescence. Mapping the moral domain, ed. Gilligan, Carolet al. Cambridge: Harvard University Center for the Study of Gender, Education and Human Development.Google Scholar
Bartky, Sandra Lee. 1990. Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a different voice: Psychological theories and women's development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Roberta M. and Sandler, Bemice R. (1982). The classroom climate: A chilly one for women? Project on the status and education of women. Washington, D.C.: Association of American Colleges.Google Scholar
Houston, Barbara. 1987. Rescuing womanly virtues: Some dangers of moral reclamation. In Science, Morality and Feminist Theory, ed. Hannen, Marsha and Nielsen, Kai.10.1080/00455091.1987.10715937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maltz, Daniel and Borker, Ruth. 1983. A cultural approach to male‐female miscommunication. In Language and social Identity, ed. Gumperz, John J.New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Noddings, Nel. 1984. Caring: Feminine approaches to ethics and moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. 1990. You just don't understand: Women and men in conversation. New York: Morrow.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. 1992. That's not what I meant: How conversational style makes or breaks relationships. New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar