Hostname: page-component-68945f75b7-6q656 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-02T12:15:07.415Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reduce Ourselves to Zero?: Sabina Lovibond, Iris Murdoch, and Feminism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Nora Hämäläinen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In her book Iris Murdoch, Gender and Philosophy, Sabina Lovibond argues that Iris Murdoch's philosophical and literary work is covertly dedicated to an ideology of female subordination. The most central and interesting aspect of her multifaceted argument concerns Murdoch's focus on the individual person's moral self‐scrutiny and transformation of consciousness. Lovibond suggests that this focus is antithetical to the kind of communal and structural criticism of society that has been essential for the advance of feminism. She further reads Murdoch's dismissal of “structuralism” as proof of Murdoch's alleged conservatism and neglect of feminist concerns. In this article I will argue that this line of argument—though not completely off‐base concerning the awkwardness of Murdoch's relation to feminism—(1) gives a misleading picture of Murdoch's philosophical and ideological position, and (2) establishes a problematic (though not unusual) antagonism between moral self‐scrutiny and social criticism, which a closer look at Murdoch's work can help us overcome.

Type
Articles
Information
Hypatia , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , Fall 2015 , pp. 743 - 759
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altorf, Marije. 2011. After cursing the library: Iris Murdoch and the invisibility of women in philosophy. Hypatia 26 (2): 384–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. 1958. Modern moral philosophy. Philosophy 33 (124): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antonaccio, Maria. 2000. Picturing the human: The moral thought of Iris Murdoch. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Antonaccio, Maria. 2012. A philosophy to live by. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blum, Lawrence. 1994. Moral perception and particularity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blum, Lawrence. 2012. Visual metaphors in Murdoch's moral philosophy. In Iris Murdoch, Philosopher, ed. Broackes, Justin. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Broackes, Justin, ed. 2012. Iris Murdoch, philosopher. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, Bridget. 2012. Iris Murdoch and the prospects for critical moral perception. In Iris Murdoch, Philosopher, ed. Broackes, Justin. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dooley, Gillian, ed. 2003. From a tiny corner in the house of fiction: Conversations with Iris Murdoch. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Fiddes, Paul S. 2012. Murdoch, Derrida and the black prince. In Iris Murdoch: Texts and contexts, ed. Rowe, Anne and Horner, Avril. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Forsberg, Niklas. 2013. Language lost and found: On Iris Murdoch and the limits of philosophical discourse. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Hämäläinen, Nora. 2013. What is metaphysics in Murdoch's Metaphysics as a Guide to Morals? SATS – Northern European Journal of Philosophy 14 (1): 1–20.Google Scholar
Hämäläinen, Nora. 2014. What is a Wittgensteinian neo‐Platonist? Iris Murdoch, metaphysics and metaphor. Philosophical Papers 43 (2): 191–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, Margaret. 2012. Social convention and neurosis as obstacles to moral freedom. In Iris Murdoch, Philosopher, ed. Broackes, Justin. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Deborah. 1987. Iris Murdoch. Key Women Writers Series. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Laverty, Megan. 2007. Iris Murdoch's ethics: A consideration of her romantic vision. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Le Doeuff, Michele. 2002. The philosophical imaginary. Trans. C. Gordon. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Le Doeuff, Michele. 2007. Hipparchia's choice: An essay concerning women, philosophy, etc. Trans. T. Selous. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lovibond, Sabina. 2011. Iris Murdoch, gender and philosophy. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milligan, Tony. 2012. Murdoch and Derrida: Holding hands under the table. In Iris Murdoch: Texts and contexts, ed. Rowe, Anne and Horner, Avril. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Moi, Toril. 2013. Språk og oppmerksomhet. Oslo: Aschehoug.Google Scholar
Murdoch, Iris. 1992. Metaphysics as a guide to morals. London: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar
Murdoch, Iris. 1997. Existentialists and mystics: Writings on philosophy and literature. London: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar
Nicol, Bran. 2001. Philosophy's dangerous pupil: Murdoch and Derrida. MFS Modern Fiction Studies 47 (3): 580–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. 1990. Love's knowledge: Essays on philosophy and literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Osborn, Pamela. 2012. Minding the gap: Mourning in the work of Murdoch and Derrida. In Iris Murdoch: Texts and contexts, ed. Rowe, Anne and Horner, Avril. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Robjant, David. 2011. Is Iris Murdoch an unconcious misogynist? Some trouble with Sabina Lovibond, the mother in law, and gender. Heythrop Journal 52 (6): 1021–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weese, Katherine L. 2001. Feminist uses of the fantastic in Iris Murdoch's The Sea, the Sea. MFS Modern Fiction Studies 47 (3): 630–56.Google Scholar
Widdows, Heather. 2005. Murdoch's morality. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar