Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T05:27:00.820Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Re-radicalizing Nelson's Feminist Empiricism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Edrie Sobstyl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The relationship between individuals and communities in knowing is a central topic of discussion in current feminist epistemology. Lynn Hankinson Nelson's work is unusual in grounding knowledge primarily in the community rather than the individual. In this essay I argue that responses to Nelson's work are based on a misinterpretation of her holistic approach. However, Nelson's holism is incomplete and hence inconsistent. I defend a more radically holistic feminist empiricism with a multiaspect view of the knower, which is more consistent with a feminist empiricist approach to evidence.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 19 , Issue 1: Special Issue: Feminist Science Studies , Winter 2004 , pp. 119 - 141
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Addelson, Kathryn Pyne. 1983. The man of professional wisdom. In Discovering reality: feminist perspectives on epistemology, metaphysics, methodology and philosophy of science, ed. Harding, Sandra and Hintikka, Merrill B.Dordrecht, Netherlands: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Bordo, Susan. 1987. The flight to objectivity: Essays on Cartesianism and culture. Albany, N.Y.: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Richmond. 1998. Illusions of paradox: A feminist epistemology naturalized. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Code, Lorraine. 1987. Epistemic responsibility. Hanover, N.H.: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
Code, Lorraine. 1991. What can she know? Feminist theory and the construction of knowledge. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Collins, Patricia Hill. 1991. Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Grasswick, Heidi. 1996. “Socialized individuals in epistemic communities: Keeping the normative project of epistemology alive” Ph.D. diss., University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Grinnell, Frederick. 1992. The scientific attitude. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna. 1991. Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1986. The science question in feminism. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1996. Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is ‘Strong Objectivity’? In Feminism and science, ed. Keller, Evelyn Fox and Longino, Helen E.Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hekman, Susan J. 1990. Gender and knowledge: Elements of a postmodern feminism. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Hempel, Carl. 1966. Philosophy of natural science. Englewood, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Hoagland, Sarah L. 1988. Lesbian ethics: Toward new value. Palo Alto, Calif.: Institute of Lesbian Studies.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaggar, Alison M. 1983. Feminist politics and human nature. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman and Allanheld.Google Scholar
Keller, Evelyn Fox. 1992. Secrets of life, secrets of death: Essays on language, gender and science. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas. 1962. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Genevieve. 1984. The man of reason: ‘Male’ and ‘female’ in western philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Longino, Helen E. 1990. Science as social knowledge: Values and objectivity in scientific inquiry. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Longino, Helen E. 1993. Essential tensions—phase two: Feminist, philosophical, and social studies of science. In A mind of one's own: Feminist essays on reason and objectivity, ed. Antony, Louise and Witt, Charlotte. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Longino, Helen E. 2002. The fate of knowledge. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, Ernest. 1961. The structure of science: Problems in the logic of scientific explanation. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Lynn Hankinson. 1990. Who knows: From Quine to a feminist empiricism. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, Lynn Hankinson. 1993. Epistemological communities. In Feminist epistemologies, ed. Alcoff, Linda Martin and Potter, Elizabeth. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Quine, Willard V. O. 1966. The ways of paradox and other essays. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Quine, Willard V. O. 1969. Ontological relativity and other essays. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, Willard V. O. 1981. Theories and things. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rouse, Joseph. 1987. Knowledge and power: Toward a political philosophy of science. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Sellars, Wilfrid. 1997. Empiricism and the philosophy of mind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sellars, Wilfrid. 2002. More on givenness and explanatory coherence. In Siblings under the skin: Feminism, social justice and analytic philosophy, ed. Clough, Sharyn. Aurora, Colo.: Davies Group.Google Scholar
Sobstyl, Edrie. 2002. Lost in logical space: Sellars and feminist coherentism. In Siblings under the skin: Feminism, social justice and analytic philosophy, ed. Clough, Sharyn. Aurora, Colo.: Davies Group.Google Scholar
Tanesini, Alessandra. 1999. An introduction to feminist epistemologies. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
West, Robin. 1991. Jurisprudence and gender. In Feminist legal theory: Readings in law and gender, ed. Bartlett, Katharine T. and Kennedy, Rosanne. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Wollstonecraft, Mary. 1997. A vindication of the rights of woman. Peterborough, Ont.: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
Zack, Naomi. 1996. Bachelors of science: Seventeenth‐century identity, then and now. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar