Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T06:49:11.091Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Shifting Subjects Shifting Ground: The Names and Spaces of the Post-Colonial

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Sangeeta Ray
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay participates in a feminist postcohnial critical historiographyfepistemol’ ogy by providing a critique of The Post-Colonial Critic: Interviews, Strategies, Dialogues. The essay considers Spivak's success in interrogating her own position as a leading postcohnial critic as she engages in dialogues with various people. Spivak's commitment to cross-cultural exchanges is undeniable. However, at times the resurgence of her authoritative subject position deflects productive tensions generated by careful scrutiny of the category postcohnial.

Type
Review Essay
Information
Hypatia , Volume 7 , Issue 2: Special Issue: Philosophy and Language , Spring 1992 , pp. 188 - 201
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bhaba, Homi K. 1988. The commitment to theory. New Formations 5: 5–23.Google Scholar
Brown, Wendy. 1991. Feminist hesitations, postmodern exposures, differences 3: 63–84.Google Scholar
Busia, Abena P.A. 1989. Silencing Sycorax: On African colonial discourse and the unvoiced female. Cultural Critique 14: 81–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chrissman, Laura. 1990. The imperial unconscious? Representations of imperial discourse. Critical Quarterly 32: 38–57.10.1111/j.1467-8705.1990.tb00605.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, Laura E. 1988. The Miranda complex: Colonialism and the question of feminist reading. Diacritics 18: 65–76.10.2307/465255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohanty, Chandra Talpade. 1991. Cartographies of struggle: Third World women and the politics of feminism. In Third World women and the politics of feminism, ed. Talpade Mohanty, Chandra, Russo, Ann and Torres, Lourdes. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Mohanty, Chandra Talpade. 1984. Under Western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. Bound’ ary 212: 333–358.Google Scholar
Meese, Elizabeth A. 1989. The political is the personal: The construction of identity in Nadine Gordimer's Burger's daughter. In Feminism and institutions, ed. Kauffman, Linda. Cambridge and Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Minh‐ha, Trinh T. 1990. Woman, native, other: Interview with Pratibha Parmar. Feminist Review. 36: 65–74.Google Scholar
Parry, Benita. 1987. Problems in current theories of colonial discourse. Oxford Literary Review. 9: 27–58.10.3366/olr.1987.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radhakrishnan, R. 1989. Negotating subject positions in an uneven world. In Feminism and institutions, ed. Kauffman, Linda. Cambridge and Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sharpe, Jenny. 1989. Figures of colonial resistance. Modem Fiction Studies 35: 137–55.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1987. A literary representation of the subaltern: A woman's text from the Third World. In In other worlds: Essays in cultural politics. London and New York: Methuen.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1988. The political economy of woman as seen by a literary critic. In Coming to terms, ed. Weed, Elizabeth. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1990. The post‐colonial critic: Interviews, strategies, dialogues, ed. Harasym, Sarah. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar