Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-24T13:18:52.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Standpoint Epistemology Without the “Standpoint”?: An Examination of Epistemic Privilege and Epistemic Authority

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Marianne Janack
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper I argue that the distinction between epistemic privilege and epistemic authority is an important one for feminist epistemologists who are sympathetic to feminist standpoint theory, I argue that, while the first concept is elusive, the second is really the important one for a successful feminist standpoint project.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , Spring 1997 , pp. 125 - 139
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alcoff, Linda, and Potter, Elizabeth. 1993. Feminist epistemologies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bar On, Bat-Ami. 1993. Marginality and epistemic privilege. Ii Feminist epistemologies. See Alcoff and Potter 1993.Google Scholar
Bleier, Ruth. 1983. Science and gender. Elmsford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Code, Lorraine. 1993. Taking subjectivity into account. Ii Feminist epistemologies. See Alcoff and Potter 1993.Google Scholar
Collins, Patricia Hill. 1991. Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
DeGeorge, Richard. 1985. The nature and limits of authority. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Digest of education statistics. 1992. National Center for Education Statistics. United States Department of Education. Office of Educational Research and Improvement. NCES 92–097.Google Scholar
Fausto-Sterling, Anne. 1985. Myths of gender. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Furnham, A. and Schofield, S. 1986. Sex role stereotyping in British radio advertisements. British Journal of Social Psychology, 25: 165–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaventa, John. 1980. Power and powerlessness: Quiescence and rebellion in an Applachian valley. Urbana: University of Illinois.Google Scholar
Geller, Jeffrey and Harris, Maxine, ed. 1994. Women of the asylum: voices from behind the walls, 1840–1945. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Gilman, Charlotte Perkins. 1973. The yellow wallpaper. New York: Feminist Press.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1986. The science question in feminism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1993. Rethinking standpoint epistemology: “What is strong objectivity”? Ii Feminist epistemologies. See Alcoff and Potter 1993.Google Scholar
Hennessy, Rosemary. 1993. Materialist feminism and the politics of discourse. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jaggar, Alison. 1983. Feminist politics and human nature. Totowa: Rowman and Allanheld.Google Scholar
Lakatos, Imre. 1990. Philosophical papers volume 2: Mathematics, science, and epistemology. John Worrall and Gregory Currie. New York: Cambridge University.Google Scholar
Livingstone, S. and Green, G. 1986. Television advertisements and the portrayal of gender. British Journal of Social Psychology, 25: 149–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longino, Helen. 1990. Science as social knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
McArthur, L. and Resko, B. 1975. The portrayal of men and women in American television commercials. Journal of Social Psychology, 97: 209–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Lynn Hankinson. 1990. Who knows?. Philadelphia: Temple University.Google Scholar
Nelson, Lynn Hankinson 1993. Epistemological communities. Ii Feminist epistemologies. See Alcoff and Potter 1993.Google Scholar
Potter, Elizabeth. 1993. Epistemic negotiation. Ii Feminist epistemologies. See Alcoff and Potter 1993.Google Scholar
Romei, Annibale. 1598. The courtiers academie: Comprehending seuen seuerall dayes discourses. Trans. London, I.K. Ii A social history of truth see Shapin 1994.Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven. 1994. A social history of truth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar