Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-fnpn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T02:43:04.915Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Thinking Through the Body: Women Artists and the Catholic Imagination

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Abstract

Mariology—the veneration of the Virgin Mary—exerts a profound influence on women artists from Catholic backgrounds. Internalizing the mixed signals Mary transmits about purity, female strength, and compassion, they reinterpret the stories and mythologies surrounding her in ways that allow them to explore the ambiguities of the female role in contemporary society while also examining their conflicts about their own sexuality.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bayless, Sarah. 1999. The 24 hour a day artist. Artnews (November): 163–64).Google Scholar
Benson, Carol, and Metz, Allan, ed. 1999. The Madonna companion. New York: Schirmer Books.Google Scholar
Bynum, Catherine Walker. 1992. Fragmentation and redemption. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Cappellazzo, Amy. 2000. Mother Lode. In Janine Antoni. Kusnacht, Germany.: Ink Tree EditionsGoogle Scholar
Close, Chuck. 1996. Interview with Lisa Yuskavage. In Lisa Yuskavage, ed. Hirsch, Faye. New York: Smart Art Press.Google Scholar
Croft, Karen. 2001. Using her body: Interview with Renee Cox. Salon.com, February 22.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. 1860. Great expectations, need place of publication and publisher10.1093/oseo/instance.00121334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobrzynski, Judith H. 1998. Petah Coyne's art strategy has its scary moments. New York Times, October 6, Weekend SectionGoogle Scholar
Evans, G. R., ed. and trans. 1987. Bernard of Clairvaux: Selected works. New York: Paulist Press.Google Scholar
Frankel, David. 1998. In her own words: Interview with Kiki Smith. In Kiki Smith, ed. Posner, Helene. New York: Bullfinch Press.Google Scholar
Gould, Claudia. 1992. Interview with Kiki Smith. In Kiki Smith by Shearer, Linda and Gould, Claudia. Catalogue for Williams College Museum of Art, Williamstown, Mass.Google Scholar
Greeley, Andrew. 2000. The Catholic imagination. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Heartney, Eleanor. Forthcoming. Postmodern heretics: The Catholic imagination in contemporary art.Google Scholar
Lennon, John, and McCartney, Paul. 1970. Let it Be. The Beatles. Apple Records AR 34001.Google Scholar
Norris, Kathleen. 1999. Meditations on Mary. New York: Viking Studio.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, Richard. 1996. India. In Goddess of the Americas: Writing on the Virgin of Guadalupe, ed. Castillo, Ann. Berkeley: Putnam Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Schleifer, Kristen Brooke. 1991. Inside & out: An interview with Kiki Smith. Print Collector's Newsletter 22 (July/August): 8487.Google Scholar
Schwartz, David, and Rubin, Lauren. 2001. Cardinal draws art line. New York Daily News, March 5.Google Scholar
Steinberg, Leo. 1986. The sexuality of Christ in renaissance art and in modern oblivion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Tracy, David. 1990. The analogical imagination: Christian theology and the culture of pluralism. New York: Crossroad Publishing.Google Scholar
Warner, Marina. 1983. Alone of all her sex: The myth and the cult of the Virgin Mary. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Warner, Marina. 2000. Child's play. In Janine Antoni, ed. Antoni, Janine. Kusnacht, Ger.: Ink Tree Editions.Google Scholar
Wills, Garry. 2000. Papal sin: Structures of deceit. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar