Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-rvbq7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T07:15:37.390Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Transforming Sacrifice: Irigaray and the Politics of Sexual Difference

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Anne Caldwell
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay examines Irigaray's analysis of politics and the political implications of her critique of sacrificial orders that repress difference/matter. I suggest that her descriptions of a fluid “feminine” can be read as an alternative symbolic not dependent on repression. This idea is politically promising in opening a possibility for justice and a nonantagonistic intersubjectivity. I conclude by assessing Irigaray's concrete proposals for sexuate rights and a civil identity for women.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 17 , Issue 4 , Fall 2002 , pp. 16 - 38
Copyright
Copyright © 2002 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anzaldua, Gloria, and Moraga, Cherrie. 1983. This bridge called my back. New York: Women of Color Press.Google Scholar
Armour, Ellen. 1997. Questions of proximity: “Woman's place” in Derrida and Irigaray. Hypatia (12) 1: 63–78.Google Scholar
Armour, Ellen. 1999. Deconstruction, feminist theology, and the problem of difference: Subverting the race/gender divide. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bataille, Georges. 1985. Visions of excess: Selected writings, 1927–1939. Ed. Stoekl, Allan. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Bataille, Georges. 1991. The accursed share: An essay on general economy, V. II‐III, trans. Hurley, Robert. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. 1977. The origin of German tragic drama, trans. Osborne, Joan. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Blanchot, Maurice. 1988. The unavowable community, trans. Joris, Pierre. New York: Station Hill Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Wendy. 1992. Finding the man in the state. Feminist Studies (18) 1: 7–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Wendy. 1995. States of injury: Power and freedom in late modernity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1993. Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex.” New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chanter, Tina. 1995. Ethics of eros: Irigaray's rewriting of the philosophers. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cheah, Pheng, and Grosz, Elizabeth. 1998a. Of being‐two: Introduction. Diacritics (28) 1: 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheah, Pheng, and Grosz, Elizabeth. 1998b. The future of sexual difference: An interview with Judith Butler and Drucilla Cornell. Diacritics (28) 1: 19–42.Google Scholar
Colebrook, Claire. 1997. Feminist philosophy and the philosophy of feminism: Irigaray and the history of western metaphysics. Hypatia (12) 1: 79–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornell, Drucilla. 1991. Beyond accomodation: Ethical feminism, deconstruction, and the law. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cornell, Drucilla. 1992. The philosophy of the limit. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Critchley, Simon. 1992. The ethics of deconstruction: Derrida and Levinas. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
de Lauretis, Theresa. 1994. The essence of the triangle, or, taking the risk of essentialism seriously: Feminist theory in Italy, the U.S., and Britain. In The Essential Difference, ed. Naomi, Schor, and Weed, Elizabeth. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1976. Of grammatology, trans. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1981. Violence and metaphysics. In Writing and difference, trans. Bass, Allan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1992. Force of law: The “mystical foundation of authority.” In Deconstruction and the possibility of justice, ed. Carlson, David Gray, Cornell, Drucilla, and Rosenfield, Michael. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1995. “Eating Well,” Or the calculation of the subject. In Points: Interviews 1974–1994, trans. Kamuf, Peggy and Others, ed Weber, Elisabeth. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Deutscher, Penelope. 1994. “The only diabolical thing about women …”: Luce Irigaray on divinity. Hypatia (9) 4: 88–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutscher, Penelope. 1998a. Book Review: I love to you. Hypatia (13) 2:10–15.Google Scholar
Deutscher, Penelope. 1998b. Mourning the other, cultural cannibalism, and the politics of friendship (Jacques Derrida and Luce Irigaray). differences (10) 3: 159–84.Google Scholar
Eisenstein, Zillah R. 1993. The radical future of liberal feminism. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 1981. Public man, private woman: Women in social and political thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Girard, Rene. 1977. Violence and the sacred, trans. Gregory, Patrick. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Godard, Linda. 1985. Pour une nouvelle lecture de la question de la “femme”: Essai a partir de la pensée de Jacques Derrida. Philosophiques (12) 1: 147–64.Google Scholar
Hooks, Bell. 1984. Feminist theory: From margin to center. Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, Patricia J. 1998. Ecstatic subjects, utopia and recognition: Kristeva, Heidegger, Irigaray. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 1960. Fifth mediation. In Cartesian mediations: An introduction to phenomenology, trans. Cairns, Dorion. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1985a. Speculum of the other woman, trans. Gill, Gillian C.Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1985b. This sex which is not one, trans. Porter, Catherine with Burke, Carolyn. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1993a. Sexes and genealogies, trans. Gill, Gillian C.New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1993b. An ethics of sexual difference, trans. Burke, Carolyn and Gill, Gillian C.Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1994. Thinking the difference: For a peaceful revolution, trans. Montin, Karin. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1995. The question of the Other. Yale French Studies: Another Look, Another Woman 8: 7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1996. I love to you: Sketch of a possible felicity in history, trans. Martin, Alison. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1999. The forgetting of air in Martin Heidegger, trans. Mader, Mary Beth. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques. 1977. Ecrits: A selection, trans. Sheridan, Alan. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques. 1998. The seminar of Jacques Lacan Book XX: On feminine sexuality: The limits of love and knowledge 1972–1973, trans. Fink, Bruce. New York: W. W. Norton and Co.Google Scholar
Lorraine, Tasmin. 1999. Irigaray and Deleuze: Experiments in visceral philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
MacCannell, Juliet Flower. 1991. The regime of the brother: After the patriarchy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mink, Gwendolyn. 1998. Welfare's end. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Minow, Martha. 1990. Making all the difference: Inclusion, exclusion, and American law. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Mortenson, Ellen. 1994. Woman's untruth and le feminin: Reading Luce Irigaray with Nietzsche and Heidegger. In Engaging with Irigaray, ed. Burke, CarolynSchor, Naomi, and Whitford, Margaret. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Oliver, Kelly. 1995. Womanizing Nietzsche: Philosophy's relation to the “feminine.” New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carol. 1989. The disorder of women: Democracy, feminism and political theory. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Poovey, Mary. 1992. The abortion question and the death of man. In Feminists theorize the political, ed. Judith, Butler, and Scott, Joan W.New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Riley, Denise. 1990. “Am I that Name?”: Feminism and the Category of “Women” in History. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Rose, Jacqueline. 1982. Introduction‐II. In Feminine sexuality: Jacques Lacan and the ecole freudienne, ed. Jacqueline, Rose, and Mitchell, Juliet. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Schor, Naomi. 1989. This essentialism which is not one: Coming to grips with Irigaray. differences (1) 2: 38–58.Google Scholar
Schor, Naomi. 1994. This essentialism which is not one: Coming to grips with Irigaray. In Engaging with Irigaray, ed. Burke, CarolynSchor, Naomi, and Whitford, Margaret. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schor, Naomi. 1995. French feminism is a universalism. differences (7) 1: 15–47.Google Scholar
Schwab, Gail M. 1994. Mother's body, father's tongue: Mediation and the symbolic order. In Engaging with Irigaray, ed. Burke, CarolynSchor, Naomi, and Whitford, Margaret. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schwab, Gail M. 1998. Sexual difference as model: An ethics for the global future. Diacritics (28) 1: 76–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spelman, Elizabeth V. 1988. Inessential woman: Problems of exclusion in feminist thought. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1993. French feminism revisited. In Outside in the teaching machine. Routledge: NewYork.Google Scholar
Thiele, Leslie Paul. 1995. Timely meditations: Martin Heidegger and postmodern politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weir, Allison. 1996. Sacrificial logics: Feminist theory and the critique of identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Whitford, Margaret. 1991. Luce Irigaray: Philosophy in the feminine. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Whitford, Margaret. 1994. Reading Irigaray in the nineties. In Engaging with Irigaray, ed. Burke, CarolynSchor, Naomi, and Whitford, Margaret. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Wendy. 1991. The equality crisis: Some reflections on culture, courts, and feminism. In Feminist legal theory: Readings in law and gender, ed. Bartlett, Katharine T., and Kennedy, Rosanne. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1990. Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar