Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g78kv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T06:32:09.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Backlash, Repetition, Untimeliness: The Temporal Dynamics of Feminist Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Victoria Browne
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Susan Faludi's Backlash, first published in 1991, offers a compelling account of feminism being forced to repeat itself in an era hostile to its transformative potentials and ambitions. Twenty years on, this paper offers a philosophical reading of Faludi's text, unpacking the model of social and historical change that underlies the “backlash” thesis. It focuses specifically on the tension between Faludi's ideal model of social change as a movement of linear, step‐by‐step, continuous progress, and her depiction of feminist history in terms of endless repetition. If we uphold a linear, teleological ideal of social change, I argue, repetition can only be thought of in negative terms—as a step backwards or a waste of time—which in turn has a negative and demoralizing impact within feminism itself. To explore an alternative model of historical time and change, I turn to the work of feminist philosopher Christine Battersby, who rethinks repetition through the Kierkegaardian mode of “recollecting forwards,” and the Nietzschean notion of “untimeliness.” I suggest that Battersby's philosophical reconceptualization of historical repetition, as a potentially creative, productive phenomenon, can be of great utility to feminists as we enact and negotiate the dynamics of backlash politics.

Type
Open Issue Content
Information
Hypatia , Volume 28 , Issue 4 , Fall 2013 , pp. 905 - 920
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahmed, Sara. 2004. The cultural politics of emotion. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Battersby, Christine. 1989. Gender and genius: Towards a feminist aesthetics. London: The Women's Press.Google Scholar
Battersby, Christine. 1998. The phenomenal woman: Feminist metaphysics and the patterns of identity. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Battersby, Christine. 2007. The sublime, terror and human difference. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brown, Wendy. 2001. Politics out of history. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamberlain, Jane, and Rée, Jonathan, eds. 2001. The Kierkegaard reader. Oxford and Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Collins, Patricia Hill. 1998. Fighting words: Black women and the search for justice. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Cox, Nicole, and Federici, Silvia. 1976. Counter‐planning from the kitchen: Wages for housework, a perspective on capital and the left. Brooklyn: New York Wages for Housework Committee.Google Scholar
Dalla Costa, Mariarosa, and James, Selma. 1973. The power of women and the subversion of the community. Bristol, UK: Falling Wall.Google Scholar
Elam, Diane. 1999. Sisters are doing it to themselves. In Generations: Academic feminists in dialogue, ed. Looser, Devoney and Kaplan, Ann E.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Faludi, Susan. 1992. Backlash: The undeclared war against American women. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth. 2005. Time travels: Feminism, nature, power. Durham, N.C., and London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemmings, Clare. 2011. Why stories matter: The political grammar of feminist theory. Durham, N.C., and London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchings, Kimberley. 2008. Time and world politics: Thinking the present. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jameson, Frederic. 1981. The political unconscious: Narrative as a socially symbolic act. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Jones, Rachel. 2009. Between fractures and folds: Battersby on active matter and “others within.” Unpublished conference paper. “Situated Selves” conference, University of Liverpool. October 2009.Google Scholar
Mann, Regis. 2011. Theorizing “what could have been”: Black feminism, historical memory, and the politics of reclamation. Women's Studies 40 (5): 575–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulholland, Hélene. 2011. David Willetts blames feminism over lack of jobs for working men. The Guardian, April 1. http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2011/apr/01/david-willetts-feminism-lack-of-jobs (accessed August 24, 2012).Google Scholar
Pearson, Keith Ansell, and Large, Duncan 2006. The Nietzsche reader. Oxford, Malden, Mass., and Carlton, Australia: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Power, Nina. 2009. One‐dimensional woman. Winchester, UK, and Washington, D.C.: O Books.Google Scholar
Sandoval, Chela. 2000. Methodology of the oppressed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Waters, Kristin, and Conaway, Carol B. 2007. Introduction. In Black women's intellectual traditions: Speaking their minds, ed. Waters, Kristin and Conaway, Carol B.Lebanon, N.H.: University of Vermont Press.Google Scholar
Weeks, Kathi. 2011. The problem with work: Feminism, Marxism, antiwork politics, and postwork imaginaries. Durham, N.C., and London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Withers, Deborah. 2011. Strategic affinities: The intimacy of epistemology and historiography in contemporary feminism. Unpublished conference paper. “Futures of Feminism” conference, Brunel University. July 2011.Google Scholar