Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T12:55:06.518Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Feminist Inquiry and the Transformation of the “Public” Sphere in Virginia Held's Feminist Morality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Michele M. Moody-Adams
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Virginia Held's Feminist Morality defends the idea that it is possible to transform the “public” sphere by remaking it on the model of existing “private” relationships such as families. This paper challenges Held's optimism. It is argued that feminist moral inquiry can aid in transforming the public sphere only by showing just how much the allegedly “private” realms of families and personal relationships are shaped—and often misshapen—by public demands and concerns.

Type
Review Essay
Information
Hypatia , Volume 11 , Issue 1: Special Issue: The Family and Feminist Theory , Winter 1996 , pp. 155 - 167
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baier, Annette. 1985. Doing without moral theory? In Postures of the mind. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Baier, Annette. 1994. What do women want in a moral theory? In Moral prejudices. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chodorow, Nancy. 1978. The reproduction of mothering. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Coontz, Scephanie. 1992. The way we never were: American families and the nostalgia trap. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Davis‐Floyd, Robbie E. 1992. Birth as an American rite of passage. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Eyer, Diana E. 1992. Mother‐infant bonding: A scientific fiction. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Held, Virginia. 1982. The political testing of moral theories. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 7: 343–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Held, Virginia. 1984. Rights and goods: Justifying social action. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Held, Virginia. 1993. Feminist morality: Transforming culture, society, and politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kittay, Eva. F. 1984. Womb envy: An explanatory concept. In Mothering, ed. Treblicot, Joyce. Totowa NJ: Rowman and Allanheld.Google Scholar
Moody‐Adams, Michele M. 1990. On the alleged methodological infirmity of ethics. American Philosophical Quarterly 27(3): 225–36.Google Scholar
Moody‐Adams, Michele M. 1991a. On surrogacy: Morality, markets and motherhood. Public Affairs Quarterly. 5: 175–89.Google Scholar
Moody‐Adams, Michele M. 1991b. Gender and the complexity of moral voices. In Feminist Ethics, ed. Card, Claudia. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar