Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T13:04:31.183Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gender-Affirmation and Loving Attention

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2021

E. M. Hernandez
E. M. Hernandez*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
*
Corresponding author. Email: em.hernandez@uci.edumatthew9@live.unc.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article I examine the moral dimensions of gender-affirmation. I argue that the moral value of gender-affirmation is rooted in what Iris Murdoch called loving attention. Loving attention is central to the moral value of gender-affirmation because such affirmation is otherwise too fragile or insincere to have such value. Moral reasons to engage in acts that gender-affirm derive from the commitment to give and express loving attention to trans people as a way of challenging their marginalization. In the latter part of the article, I will discuss how my arguments bear on recent arguments by Robin Dembroff and Daniel Wodak on the use of gender-neutral language (Dembroff and Wodak 2018). They argue that we have a duty not to use gender-specific pronouns for anyone. Their conclusion turns, in part, on a rejection of gender-affirmation as a moral duty. The value of gender-affirmation, rooted in our moral perception of trans people, should make us skeptical of this conclusion, in favor of a more nuanced and pluralistic approach to the ethics of gendering.

Type
Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 36 , Issue 4 , Fall 2021 , pp. 619 - 635
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Hypatia, a Nonprofit Corporation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashley, Florence. 2019. Homophobia, conversion therapy, and care models for trans youth: Defending the gender-affirmative approach. Journal of LGBT Youth 17 (4): 1–23.Google Scholar
Baier, Annette. 1994. What do women want in moral theory? In Moral Prejudices. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bartky, Sandra Lee. 1990. Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bettcher, Talia Mae. 2009. Trans identities and first-person authority. In You've changed: Sex reassignment and personal identity, ed. Shrage, Laurie J.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bettcher, Talia Mae. 2013. Trans women and the meaning of “woman.” In The philosophy of sex: Contemporary readings. 6th ed., ed. Power, Nicholas, Halwani, Raja, and Soble, Alan. New York: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
Bettcher, Talia Mae. 2014. Trapped in the wrong theory: Rethinking trans oppression and resistance. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 39 (2): 383–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bettcher, Talia Mae. 2019. What is trans philosophy? Hypatia 34 (4): 644–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Lydia X. Z. 2017. Ableist shame and disruptive bodies: Survivorship at the intersection of queer, trans, and disabled existence. In Religion, disability, and interpersonal violence, ed. Johnson, Andy, Ruth Nelson, J., and Lunch, Emily M.. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
Dembroff, Robin. 2019. Beyond binary: Genderqueer as critical gender kind. Philosopher's Imprint 20 (9): 1–23.Google Scholar
Dembroff, Robin, and Saint-Croix, Catharine. 2019. “Yep, I'm gay”: Understanding agential identity. Ergo 6 (20): 571–99.Google Scholar
Dembroff, Robin, and Wodak, Daniel. 2018. He/she/they/ze. Ergo 5 (14): 371–406.Google Scholar
Dembroff, Robin, and Wodak, Daniel. 2021. How much gender is too much gender? In Routledge handbook of social and political philosophy of language, ed. Sterken, Rachel Katharine and Khoo, Justin. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fakhoury, Tamara. 2019. Eight dimensions of resistance. In Pacifism, politics, and feminism, ed. Kling, Jennifer. Leiden: Brill Rodopi.Google Scholar
Frye, Marilyn. 1983. The politics of reality: Essays in feminist theory. New York: Crossing Press.Google Scholar
Hill, Thomas E. 1983. Ideals of human excellence and preserving natural environments. Environmental Ethics 5 (3): 211–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapusta, Stephanie Julia. 2016. Misgendering and its moral contestability. Hypatia 31 (3): 502–19.10.1111/hypa.12259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khader, Serene J. 2018. Decolonizing universalism: A transnational feminist ethic. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190664190.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobabe, Maia. 2019. Gender queer: A memoir. St. Louis, Mo.: Lion Forge.Google Scholar
Lugones, María. 2003. Pilgrimages/peregrinajes: Theorizing coalition against multiple oppressions. New York: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
McDowell, John. 1979. Virtue and reason. The Monist 62 (3): 331–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLemore, Kevin A. 2015. Experiences with misgendering: Identity misclassification of transgender spectrum individuals. Self and Identity 14 (1): 51–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLemore, Kevin A. 2018. A minority stress perspective on transgender individuals’ experiences with misgendering. Stigma and Health 3 (1): 53–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murdoch, Iris. 1970. The sovereignty of good. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 1992. The discernment of perception: An Aristotelian conception of public and private rationality. In Love's knowledge: Essays on philosophy and literature. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Patton, Venetria K. 2000. Women in chains: The legacy of slavery in black women's fiction. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Ross, William D. 1930. The right and the good. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Saguy, Abigail C., Williams, Juliet A., Dembroff, Robin, and Wodak, Daniel. 2019. We should all use they/them pronouns . . . eventually. https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/voices/we-should-all-use-they-them-pronouns-eventually/.Google Scholar
Scanlon, Thomas. 1998. What we owe to each other. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Snorton, C. Riley. 2017. Black on both sides: A racial history of trans identity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Wolf, Susan. 2014. Loving attention: Lessons in love from The Philadelphia Story. In Understanding love through philosophy, film, and fiction, ed. Wolf, Susan and Grau, Christopher. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar