Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T08:34:38.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Impersonal Is Political: Spinoza and a Feminist Politics of Imperceptibility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Hasana Sharp
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay examines Elizabeth Grosz's provocative claim that feminist and anti-racist theorists should reject a politics of recognition in favor of “a politics of imperceptibility.” She criticizes any humanist politics centered upon a dialectic between self and other. I turn to Spinoza to develop and explore her alternative proposal. I claim that Spinoza offers resources for her promising politics of corporeality, proximity, power, and connection that includes all of nature, which feminists should explore.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 24 , Issue 4 , Fall 2009 , pp. 84 - 103
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alcoff, Linda. 2005. Visible identities: Race, gender, and the self. Oxford, N.Y.: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alquié, Ferdinand. 1981. Le rationalisme de Spinoza. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Braidotti, Rosi. 2002. Metamorphoses: Toward a materialist theory of becoming. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Wendy. 1995. States of injury: Power and freedom in late modernity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 2004. Undoing gender. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith. 2005. Giving an account of oneself. New York: Fordham University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornell, Drucilla, and Murphy, Sara. 2002. Anti‐racism, multiculturalism, and an ethics of identification. Philosophy and Social Criticism 28 (4): 419–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles, and Guattari, Felix. 1987. A thousand plateaus. Trans. B. Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Found Objects Collective. 2007. An interview with Elizabeth Grosz, http://web.gc.cuny.edu/csctw/found_object/text/grosz.htm (accessed December 14, 2007).Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 1995. From redistribution to recognition? Dilemmas of justice in a “post‐socialist” age. New Left Review 212:68–93.Google Scholar
Frazer, Elizabeth, and Lacey, Nicola. 1993. The politics of community: A feminist critique of the liberal‐communitarian debate. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gatens, Moira. 1996. Imaginary bodies: Ethics, power, and corporeality. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gatens, Moira, and Lloyd, Genevieve. 1999. Collective imaginings: Spinoza, past and present. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth. 1993. A thousand tiny sexes: Feminism and rhizomatics. Topoi: An International Review of Philosophy 12 (2): 167–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth. 2002. A politics of imperceptibility: A response to “anti‐racism, multiculturalism and the ethics of identification”. Philosophy and Social Criticism 28 (4): 463–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth. 2005. Time travels: Feminism, nature, power. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honneth, Axel. 1996. The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel, and Fraser, Nancy. 2003. Redistribution or recognition? A political‐philosophical exchange. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Kittay, Eva. 1998. Love's labor: Essays on women, equality, and dependency. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine A. 1989. Toward a feminist theory of the state. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Markell, Patchen. 2000. The recognition of politics: A comment on Emcke and Tully. Constellations 7 (4): 496–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markell, Patchen. 2003. Bound by recognition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. 2001. Upheavals of thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, Kelly. 2001. Witnessing: beyond recognition. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Rowbotham, Sheila. 1973. Woman's consciousness, man's world. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
Sharp, Hasana. 2005. Feeling justice: The reorientation of possessive desire in Spinoza. International Studies in Philosophy 37 (2): 113–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharp, Hasana. 2007. The force of ideas in Spinoza. Political Theory 35 (6): 732–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharp, Hasana. 2010 (forthcoming). Nemo non videt: Intuitive knowledge and the question of Spinoza's elitism. In Montreal studies in the history of philosophy, Vol. 1: The rationalists: Between tradition and revolution, ed. Fraenkel, C., Perinetti, D., and Smith, J.E.H.Dordrecht: Springer Press.Google Scholar
Spinoza, Benedictus de. 1985. The collected works of Spinoza, Vol. 1. Trans. E. Curley. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Spinoza, Benedictus de. 1998. Theological‐political treatise. Trans. S. Shirley. Indianapolis, Ind.: Hackett.Google Scholar
Spinoza, Benedictus de. 2000. Political treatise. Trans. S. Shirley. Indianapolis, Ind.: Hackett.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1992. The politics of recognition. In Multiculturalism and the politics of recognition, ed. Guttman, Amy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 25–74.Google Scholar