Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-7tdvq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T01:42:20.104Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Intersection of Pragmatism and Feminism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Jane Duran
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I cite areas of pragmatism and feminism that have an intersection with or an appeal to the other, including the notions of the universal and/or normative, and foundationalist lines in general. I deal with three areas from each perspective and develop the notion of their intersection. Finally, the paper discusses the importance of a pragmatic view for women's lives and the importance of psychoanalytic theory for finding another area where pragmatism and feminism mesh.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 8 , Issue 2: Special Issue: Feminism and Pragmatism , Spring 1993 , pp. 159 - 171
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bernstein, Richard J. 1986. Philosophical profiles: Essays in a pragmatic mode. Cambridge: Polity Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bordo, Susan. 1987. The flight to objectivity. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Chodorow, Nancy. 1985. The reproduction of mothering. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1929. Experience and nature. La Salle, IL: Open Court.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, John. 1939. Theory of valuation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Duran, Jane. 1990. Toward a feminist epistemology. Savage, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Keller, Evelyn Fox. 1985. Reflections on gender and science. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
McDermott, John J. 1986. Streams of experience: Reflections on the history and philosophy of American culture. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, Lynn Hankinson. 1990. Who knows? From Quine to a feminist empiricism. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1979. Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1982. Consequences of pragmatism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1966. Pragmatism. In Philosophical essays. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Schilpp, Paul. 1951. The philosophy of John Dewey. New York: Tudor.Google Scholar
Seigfried, Charlene Haddock. 1990. Second sex: Second thoughts. In Hypatia reborn, ed. Al‐Hibri, Azizah Y. and Simons, Margaret A.Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Seigfried, Charlene Haddock. 1991. Where are all the pragmatist feminists?. Hypatia 6(2): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seigfried, Charlene Haddock. 1992. Like bridges without piers: Beyond the foundationalist metaphor. In Anti‐foundationalism, old and new, ed. Rockmore, Tom and Singer, Beth J.Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Sleeper, Ralph. 1986. The necessity of pragmatism: John Dewey's conception of philosophy. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Dorothy E., and David, Sara J. 1975. Women look at psychiatry. Vancouver, BC: Press Gang.Google Scholar
Thayer, H. S. 1947. Two theories of truth: The relation between the theories of John Dewey and Bertrand Russell, Journal of Philosophy 44(19): 516–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar