Article contents
Abstract
My response to the preceding commentaries draws on recent events such as the Thomas/Hill hearings to illustrate some of my central arguments in “Feminist Skepticism and the ‘Maleness’ of Philosophy.” I also attempt to clarify frequently misunderstood aspects of my use of gender as an analytical category, and discuss why, in my opinion, we should continue to care about the “maleness” of philosophy.
- Type
- Symposium on Susan Bordo's “Feminist Skepticism and the ‘Maleness’ of Philosophy”
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1992 by Hypatia, Inc.
References
- 2
- Cited by