Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-pkt8n Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-23T14:19:24.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

More Thinking About Gender: Reply

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Julie A. Nelson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Patricia Elliot distorts my work, in summarizing my position as one of advocating a revaluing of feminine qualities. After clarifying my position, I flesh out in greater detail my argument that complete gender neutrality is neither necessary nor sufficient for a non-sexist society. The argument focuses on gender as a cognitive category and on the crucial question of “how do we get there from here.”

Type
COMMENT/REPLY
Information
Hypatia , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , Winter 1994 , pp. 199 - 205
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Elliot, Patricia. 1993. More thinking about gender: A response to Julie A. Nelson. Hypatia 9(1): 195–98.Google Scholar
Bern, Sandra L. 1981. Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review 88(4): 354–64.Google Scholar
Bern, Sandra L. 1983. Gender schema theory and its implications for child development: Raising gender‐aschematic children in a gender‐schematic society. Signs 8(4): 598–616.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville. 1991. Gender Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, Francine Wattman and Treichler, Paula A. 1989. Language, gender, and professional writing New York: Modern Language Association of America.Google Scholar
Nelson, Julie A. 1992. Thinking about gender. Hypatia 7(3): 138–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller. 1989. Justice, gender, and the family New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Piercy, Marge. 1976. Woman on the edge of time New York: Random House.Google Scholar