No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Pornography/Civil Rights Ordinance v. The BOG: And the Winner Is…?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 March 2020
Abstract
The Supreme Court dismissed the Pornography/Civil Rights Ordinance as an unconstitutional restriction of speech. The Court's dismissal itself violates the free speech of the proposers of the Ordinance. It is not possible for both pornographers to perform the speech act of making pornography and feminists to perform the speech act of proposing the Ordinance. I show that the speech act of proposing the Ordinance takes First Amendment precedence over the speech act of making pornography.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1992 by Hypatia, Inc.