Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-495rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-13T12:05:07.837Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Toward the Formation of the Public in a Marginalized Communicative Culture: Analyzing The Long Road of Woman's Memory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 June 2024

Leena Ripatti-Torniainen Open the ORCID record for Leena Ripatti-Torniainen [Opens in a new window]
Leena Ripatti-Torniainen*
Affiliation:
Communication Sciences Unit, Faculty of Information Technology and Communication Sciences Tampere University, Finland
*
Email: leena.ripatti-torniainen@tuni.fi, leena.t.ripatti@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study analyzes Jane Addams’ contribution to an enduring topic: how marginalized people join the public from beyond political, socioeconomic, cultural, and gendered barriers. I study Addams’ book, The Long Road of Woman's Memory (1916), which discusses the seemingly irrational devil baby case in Chicago. Using the concept of public and hidden transcripts and the method of cultural discourse analysis, I contextualize the book within the theorizing around the concept of the public by Addams’ contemporaries, Gabriel Tarde and Robert E. Park. The analysis shows that Addams’ discussion aligns with three conceptual aspects of the formation of the public. First, Addams describes the awakening of consciousness about a collectively relevant concern, and second, the emergence of interaction about the topic. Third, Addams constructs a conceptual distinction between two functions of memory, highlighting independent critical judgment as the divider between the two, which is the decisive factor that Park argues distinguishes the public from the crowd. Addams’ writing contains an unusual perspective in that she discusses development toward the formation of something like the public in a marginalized communicative culture. Instead of focusing on performative and dramatic public debate, Addams addresses discreet genres of communication and illustrates their public relevance.

Type
Article
Information
Hypatia , First View , pp. 1 - 18
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Hypatia, a Nonprofit Corporation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Addams, Jane. 1902. Democracy and social ethics. New York: Macmillan. https://archive.org/details/cu31924032570180/page/n7/mode/2upGoogle Scholar
Addams, Jane. 1907. Newer ideals of peace. New York: Macmillan. https://archive.org/details/cu31924032570735/page/n7/mode/2upGoogle Scholar
Addams, Jane. 1914a. Immigrant woman as she adjusts herself to American life. Biennial Convention Official Report 1914. Washington: General Federation of Women's Clubs. https://digital.janeaddams.ramapo.edu/items/show/9488Google Scholar
Addams, Jane. 1914b. A modern devil-baby. American Journal of Sociology 20 (July): 117–18. https://digital.janeaddams.ramapo.edu/items/show/9694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Addams, Jane. 1916a. The devil baby at Hull-House. Atlantic Monthly 118: 441–51. https://digital.janeaddams.ramapo.edu/items/show/10295.Google Scholar
Addams, Jane. 1916b. A long road to woman's memory. New York: Macmillan. https://archive.org/details/longroadofwomans00adda/mode/2up.Google Scholar
Addams, Jane. 1930. The second twenty years at Hull-House: September 1909 to September 1929. New York: Macmillan. https://archive.org/details/secondtwentyyear0000adda/page/n5/mode/2up.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1958. The human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Baring, Edward. 2015. Intellectual history and poststructuralism. In A companion to intellectual history, ed. Whatmore, Richard and Young, Brian. Newark, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Belanus, Betty J., and Langlois, Janet L.. 2015. Monstrous births: Motifs T550–T557. In Archetypes and motifs in folklore and literature: A handbook, ed. Garry, Jane. Armonk, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brigham, CC. 1917. Review of The Long Road of Woman's Memory. Psychological Bulletin 14 (3): 109. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0065231/.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, Ernest W., and Bogue, Donald J.. 1964. Research in urban society: A long view. In Contributions to urban sociology, ed. Burgess, Ernest W. and Bogue, Donald J.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carbaugh, Donal. 2007. Cultural discourse analysis; Communication practices and intercultural encounters. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research 36 (3): 167–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/17475750701737090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carbaugh, Donal, and Cerulli, Tovar. 2013. Cultural discourses of dwelling: Investigating environmental communication as a place-based practice. Environmental Communication 7 (1): 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2012.749296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carbaugh, Donal, and Cerulli, Tovar. 2017. Cultural discourse analysis. In The international encyclopedia of intercultural communication, cultural communication: Theories, issues, and concepts, ed. Young, Yun Kim. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Deegan, Mary Jane. 2013. Jane Addams, the Hull-House school of sociology, and social justice, 1892 to 1935. Humanity and Society 37 (3): 248–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160597613493740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, John. 1927. The public and its problems. New York: Henry Holt & Co.Google Scholar
Fischer, Marilyn. 2010. Trojan women and devil baby tales: Addams on domestic violence. In Feminist interpretations of Jane Addams, ed. Hamington, Maurice. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, Marilyn. 2019. Jane Addams's evolutionary theorizing: Constructing “Democracy and social ethics”. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 1990. Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text 25–26: 56–80. https://doi.org/10.2307/466240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. (1784) 1996. An answer to the question: What is Enlightenment? In What is Enlightenment? Eighteenth-century answers and twentieth-century questions, ed. Schmidt, James. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Knight, Louise W. 2005. Citizen: Jane Addams and the struggle for democracy. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaCapra, Dominick. 1983. Rethinking intellectual history: Texts, contexts, language. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
LaCapra, Dominick. 2009. History and its limits: Human, animal, violence. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Landes, Joan B. 1988. Women and the public sphere in the age of the French revolution. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Laursen, John C. 1996. The subversive Kant: The vocabulary of “public” and “publicity.” In What is Enlightenment? Eighteenth-century answers and twentieth-century questions, ed. Schmidt, James. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lippmann, Walter. (1925) 1927. The phantom public. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
McDonald, Lynn. 2013. Women founders of the social sciences. Montreal: McGill–Queen's University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, Robert Ezra. 1904. Masse und Publikum: Eine methodologische und soziologische Untersuchung. Bern: Buchdruckerei Lack & Grunau. https://archive.org/details/MasseUndPublikum.Google Scholar
Park, Robert Ezra. 1972. The crowd and the public. In The crowd and the public and other essays, ed. Elsner, Henry Jr. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://archive.org/details/crowdpublicother0000robe/mode/2up.Google Scholar
Pratt, Scott. 2004. Rebuilding Babylon: The pluralism of Lydia Maria Child. Hypatia 19 (2): 92–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renzi, Kristen. 2018. On Jane Addams's feminist pragmatism: Finding modern value in recovering the sentimental myth of the Devil Baby. In American literary history and the turn toward modernity, ed. Dawson, Melanie and Goldsmith, Meredith. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
Residents of Hull-House. (1895) 2007. Hull-House maps and papers: A presentation of nationalities and wages in a congested district of Chicago, together with comments and essays of problems growing out of the social conditions. Urbana, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ripatti-Torniainen, L. (2022). The transformative public of Jane Addams. Journalism 23 (6): 1285–1300. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920958583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosiek, Jerry Lee, and Pratt, Scott. 2013. Jane Addams as a resource for developing a reflexively realist social science practice. Qualitative Inquiry 19 (8): 578–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800413494345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, Mary P. 1992. Gender and public access: Women's politics in nineteenth century America. In Habermas and the public sphere, ed. Calhoun, Craig. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 1987. Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 1990. Domination and the art of resistance: Hidden transcripts. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Seigfried, Charlene Haddock. 2002. Introduction to the Illinois Edition. In The long road of woman's memory. Urbana and Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Siltanen, Janet, and Stanworth, Michelle. 1984. The politics of private woman and public man. In Women and the public sphere: A critique of sociology and politics, ed. Siltanen, Janet and Stanworth, Michelle. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Starr, Paul. 2021. The relational public. Sociological Theory 39 (2): 57–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/07352751211004660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarde, Gabriel. (1901) 1969. The public and the crowd. In On communication and social influence: Selected papers, ed. Clark, Terry N.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Weintraub, Jeff. 1997. The theory and politics of the public/private distinction. In Public and private in thought and practice: Perspectives on a grand dichotomy, ed. Weintraub, Jeff and Kumar, Krishan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Whatmore, Richard, and Young, Brian. 2015. A companion to intellectual history. Chichester: Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar