Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T17:15:14.417Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Joy Mining Machinery Limited v. Arab Republic of Egypt

ICSID (Arbitration Tribunal).  06 August 2004 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Arbitration — Contract between UK company and Egyptian State enterprise — Dispute between parties — Claimant company requesting ICSID arbitration against Egypt — ICSID arbitration provisions in UK–Egypt Bilateral Investment Treaty — Essence of dispute — Whether Claimant’s claim falling within BIT and ICSID Convention

Jurisdiction — Whether ICSID Tribunal having jurisdiction over dispute — Effect of forum selection clause in contract between parties — Whether Egypt violating Bilateral Investment Treaty — Whether conditions in Articles 25 and 26 of ICSID Convention and in BIT fulfilled — Whether there was an investment

Foreign investment — Definition — Whether bank guarantees an investment under BIT — Whether Claimant’s activities amounting to an investment under ICSID Convention — ICSID Convention, Article 25

Treaties — Bilateral Investment Treaty — Whether prima facie violation of BIT by Respondent — Non-release of bank guarantees — Whether amounting to nationalization or measures equivalent to expropriation of investment — Whether fair and equitable treatment and full protection and security afforded — Forum selection clause in contract between parties

Arbitration — Consent to UNCITRAL arbitration — Forum selection clause in contract between parties — Formal declaration by counsel of Respondent — Whether binding

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)