Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T17:36:56.560Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

IBM World Trade Corporation v. Republic of Ecuador

ICSID (Arbitration Tribunal).  22 December 2003 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Jurisdiction — Whether a void contract would bar the exercise of ICSID jurisdiction — Matter to be dealt with in the merits — Prima facie existence of the contract — Contract characterizing an investment — Certificate constituting an investment

Jurisdiction — Consent to arbitrate — Entering into a BIT by State as consent to arbitrate — No need for additional consent by State — ICSID Convention, Article 36(2)

Jurisdiction — IBM’s acquisition of shares in IBM Ecuador — Whether constituting investment by IBM in Ecuador — Default in contract indirectly affecting IBM — Whether investment protected by United States–Ecuador BIT, Article I(1) — ICSID Convention, Article 25

Jurisdiction — Exclusive jurisdiction clause under investment contract — Interpretation of terms of BIT — Fork-in-the-road provision — BIT as the fundamental basis of the claim — Domestic courts retaining jurisdiction over investment-unrelated matters

Municipal law — Illegality of the contract under municipal law — Not posing a bar to ICSID jurisdiction — Arbitrability — Primacy of international law

Municipal law — Prescription of rights under domestic law — Matter to be dealt with in the merits — Claims founded on the BIT rather than on contract

Jurisdiction — Consent to arbitrate — Exhaustion of local administrative and judicial remedies — Interpretation of terms of the BIT — BIT, Article VI — ICSID Convention, Article 26

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)