Hostname: page-component-68945f75b7-76l5x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-05T19:46:53.447Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Better together: It’s time to unify, centralize, and market our competitive advantage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2022

Christopher T. Rotolo Open the ORCID record for Christopher T. Rotolo [Opens in a new window]  and
Julian B. Allen
Christopher T. Rotolo*
Affiliation:
MiTek, Inc.
Julian B. Allen
Affiliation:
MiTek, Inc.
*
*Corresponding author. Email: chris@behavioralinsights.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , June 2022 , pp. 284 - 288
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aguinis, H., Ramani, R., Campbell, P., Bernal-Turnes, P., Drewry, J., & Edgerton, B. (2017). Most frequently cited sources, articles, and authors in industrial-organizational psychology textbooks: Implications for the science–practice divide, scholarly impact, and the future of the field. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 10(4), 507–557. doi: 10.1017/iop.2017.69 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halfhill, T., & Huff, J. (2003). The scientist–practitioner gap: Present status and potential utility of alternative article formats. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 40(4), 25–37.Google Scholar
Kolko, J. (2021, June 22). The impact of coronavirus on US job postings through June 18: Data from Indeed.com. Indeed Hiring Lab. https://www.hiringlab.org/2021/06/22/job-postings-through-june-18-2021/?utm_source=morning_brew Google Scholar
Lavidge, R. J., & Steiner, G. A. (1961). A model for predictive measurements of advertising effectiveness. Journal of Marketing, 25(6), 59–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogelberg, S. G., King, E. B., & Alonso, A. (2022). How we can bring I-O psychology science and evidence-based practices to the public. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 15(2), 259–272.Google Scholar
Rotolo, C. T. (2009). Making I-O psychology more visible: Mommy, I want to be an I-O psychologist when I grow up. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 47(1), 111–115.Google Scholar
Rotolo, C. T., Church, A. H., Adler, S., Smither, J. W., Colquitt, A. L., Shull, A. C., Paul, K. B., & Foster, G. (2018). Putting an end to bad talent management: A call to action for the field of industrial and organizational psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 11(2), 176–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rynes, S. L., Colbert, A. E., & O’Boyle, E. H. (2018). When the “best available evidence” doesn’t win: How doubts about science and scientists threaten the future of evidence-based management. Journal of Management, 44(8), 2995–3010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silzer, R., & Parson, C. (2015). Practice in I-O psychology: Trends in professional membership, activities, development, and representation (2008–2015). The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 9(18), 32–47.Google Scholar
Zelin, A. I., Oliver, J., Chau, S., Bynum, B., Carter, G., Poteet, M. L., & Doverspike, D. (2015). Identifying the competencies, critical experiences, and career paths of I-O psychologists: Consulting. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 52(4), 122–130.Google Scholar