Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-fnpn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-31T09:10:20.093Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cognitive Processes Related to Forced-Choice, Ideal Point Responses: Drasgow, Chernyshenko, and Stark Got It Right!

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Walter C. Borman
Walter C. Borman*
Affiliation:
Personnel Decisions Research Institutes and University of South Florida
*
E-mail: wally.borman@pdri.com, Address: PDRI, 100 S. Ashley Drive, Suite 1120, Tampa, FL 33602
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 3 , Issue 4 , December 2010 , pp. 504 - 506
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2010 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Personnel Decisions Research Institutes and Department of Psychology, University of South Florida.

References

Borman, W. C. (1979). Format and training effects on rating accuracy and rater errors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 410–421. Google Scholar
Borman, W. C., Buck, D. E., Hanson, M. A., Motowidlo, S. J., Stark, S., & Drasgow, F. (2001). An examination of the comparative reliability, validity, and accuracy of performance ratings made using computerized adaptive rating scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 965–973. Google Scholar
Borman, W. C., Houston, J. S., Schneider, R. J., & Ferstl, K. L. (2005, November). Adaptive personality scales: The concept and initial validation results . Presented at the 47th International Military Testing Association Conference, Singapore.Google Scholar
Dickinson, T. L., & Zellinger, P. M. (1980). A comparison of the behaviorally anchored rating and mixed standard scale formats. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 147–154. Google Scholar
Drasgow, F., Chernyshenko, O., & Stark, S. (2010). 75 years after Likert: Thurstone was right! Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 3, 465–476.Google Scholar
Houston, J. S., Schneider, R. J., Ferstl, K. L., Borman, W. C., Hedge, J. W., Farmer, W. L., Bearden, R. M. (2003). ENCAPS: Development of the Enlisted Computer Adaptive Personality Scales for the United States Navy (Institute Report No. 449). Minneapolis, MN: Personnel Decisions Research Institutes. Google Scholar
Stark, S., & Drasgow, F. (1998, April). Application of an IRT ideal point model to computer adaptive assessment of job performance . Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Dallas, TX.Google Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. (1927). Psychophysical analysis. American Journal of Psychology, 38, 368–389. Google Scholar
Zinnes, J. L., & Griggs, R. A. (1974). Probabilistic, multidimensional unfolding analysis. Psychometrika, 39, 327–350. Google Scholar