Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-sv6ng Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-06T17:31:12.448Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Complexity of Marginalized Identities: The Social Construction of Identities, Multiple Identities, and the Experience of Exclusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Winny Shen  and
Soner Dumani
Winny Shen*
Affiliation:
University of South Florida
Soner Dumani
Affiliation:
University of South Florida
*
E-mail: wshen@usf.edu, Address: Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, 4202 East Fowler Avenue, PCD 4118G, Tampa, FL 33620
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Ruggs et al. (2013) have argued compellingly that industrial–organizational (I–O) psychologists have missed opportunities to understand the experiences of marginalized groups in the workplace, particularly in generating research that will be relevant in the formation of social policies. We fully agree with Ruggs et al.'s assessment of the literature and highlight three important extensions that should be considered when conducting research with marginalized groups: the social construction of identities, the intersection of multiple identities, and the experience of exclusion.

Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , March 2013 , pp. 84 - 87
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.Google Scholar
Cheng, C., Sanchez-Burks, J., & Lee, F. (2008). Connecting the dots within: Creative performance and identity integration. Psychological Science, 19, 1178–1184.Google Scholar
Hershcovis, M. S. (2011). Incivility, social undermining, bullying…oh my! A call to reconcile constructs within workplace aggression research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 499–519.Google Scholar
Johnson, K. L., Freeman, J. B., & Pauker, K. (2012). Race is gendered: How covarying phenotypes and stereotypes bias sex categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(1), 116–131.Google Scholar
Kelly, G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs (Vol. 1–2). New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
McAdams, D. P. (1999). Personal narratives and the life story. In Pervin, L., & John, O. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2 ed., pp. 478–500). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Nagel, J. (1994). Constructing ethnicity: Creating and recreating ethnic identity and culture. Social Problems, 41, 152–176.10.2307/3096847Google Scholar
Raver, J. L., & Nishii, L. H. (2010). Once, twice, or three times as harmful? Ethnic harassment, gender harassment, and generalized workplace harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(2), 236–254.Google Scholar
Roccas, S., & Brewer, M. B. (2002). Social identity complexity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 88–106.Google Scholar
Ruggs, E. N., Law, C., Cox, C. B., Roehling, M. V., Wiener, R. L., Hebl, M. R., & Barron, L. (2013). Gone fishing: I-O psychologists' missed opportunities to understand marginalized employees' experiences with discrimination. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 6, 39–60.Google Scholar
Sellers, R. M., Rowley, S. A. J., Chavous, T. M., Shelton, J. N., & Smith, M. A. (1997). Multidimensional inventory of Black identity: A preliminary investigation of reliability and construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 805–815.Google Scholar
Tepper, B. J., & Henle, C. A. (2011). A case of recognizing distinctions among constructs that capture interpersonal mistreatment in work organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 487–498.Google Scholar