Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T07:32:30.073Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does Dynamic Composition Mean the Demise of Shared Team Properties and the Rise of Global Team Properties?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Suzanne T. Bell  and
David M. Fisher
Suzanne T. Bell*
Affiliation:
Depaul University
David M. Fisher
Affiliation:
Depaul University
*
E-mail: sbell11@depaul.edu, Address: DePaul University, 2219 N. Kenmore Ave., Chicago, IL 60614
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , March 2012 , pp. 39 - 41
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bell, S. T., & Marentette, B. J. (2011). Team viability for long-term and ongoing organizational teams. Organizational Psychology Review, 1, 275–292.10.1177/2041386611405876Google Scholar
De Dreu, C. K. W., & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 741–749. 10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.741Google Scholar
Klein, K. J., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2000). From micro to meso: Critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multilevel research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 211–236. 10.1177/109442810033001Google Scholar
LePine, J. A., Piccolo, R. F., Jackson, C. L., Mathieu, J. E., & Saul, J. R. (2008). A meta-analysis of teamwork processes: Tests of a multidimensional model and relationships with team effectiveness criteria. Personnel Psychology, 61, 273–307. 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00114.xGoogle Scholar
Shaw, J. D., Zhu, J., Duffy, M. K., Scott, K. L., Shih, H., & Susanto, E. (2011). A contingency model of conflict and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 391–400. 10.1037/a0021340Google Scholar
Tannenbaum, S. I., Mathieu, J. E., Salas, E., & Cohen, D. (2012). Teams are changing: Are research and practice evolving fast enough? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5, 2–24. 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01396.xGoogle Scholar