Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T19:57:44.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Science, Practice, and Morality of Work Psychology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Joel Lefkowitz
Joel Lefkowitz*
Affiliation:
Bernard M. Baruch College, The City University Of New York
*
E-mail: Joel.Lefkowitz@Baruch.cuny.edu, Address: Department of Psychology, Box B8-215, Baruch College, CUNY, 55 Lexington Avenue, New York, NY 10010
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , March 2011 , pp. 112 - 115
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2011 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 57, 1060–1073. Google Scholar
Baritz, L. (1960). The servants of power: A history of social science in American industry. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. Google Scholar
Carr, S. C. (2007). I–O psychology and poverty reduction: Past, present and future? Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 45(1), 43–50. Google Scholar
Carr, S. C., McWha, I., MacLachlan, M., & Furnham, A. (2010). Expatriate–local remuneration differences across six cultures: Do they undermine poverty reduction work? International Journal of Psychology, 45(5), 321–340.Google Scholar
Hoshmand, L. T. & Polkinghorne, D. E. (1992). Redefining the science-practice relationship and professional training. American Psychologist, 47, 55–66. Google Scholar
Howard, G. S. (1985). The role of values in the science of psychology. American Psychologist, 40, 255–265. Google Scholar
Katzell, R. A., & Austin, J. T. (1992). From then to now: The development of industrial–organizational psychology in the United States. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 803–835. Google Scholar
Kornhauser, A. (1947). Industrial psychology as management technique and as social science. American Psychologist, 2, 224–229. Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, J. (1990). The scientist–practitioner model is not enough. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 28(1), 47–52. Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, J. (2003). Ethics and values in industrial–organizational psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, J. (2005). The values of industrial–organizational psychology: Who are we? The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 43(2), 13–20. Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, J. (2008). To prosper, organizational psychology should … expand its values to match the quality of its ethics. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 439–453. Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, J. (2009). Promoting employee justice: It's even worse than that! Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 2, 221–225. Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, J. (2010a). Industrial–organizational psychology's recurring identity crises: It's a values issue! Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 3, 293–299. Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, J. (2010b). Special section commentary 1. Can professions contribute to the reduction of world-wide poverty? A case in point: Organizational psychology and pay diversity. International Journal of Psychology, 45(5), 371–375.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, J. (in press). Ethics in industrial–organizational psychology. In Knapp, S., VandeCreek, L., Gottlieb, M., & Handelsman, M. (Eds.), APA handbook of ethics in psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Luria, S. E. (1976). Biological aspects of ethical principles. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 1, 332–336. Google Scholar
Muchinsky, P. M. (2006). Enhancing industrial/organizational psychology: A challenging mandate at the dawn of the 21st century. Japanese Association of Industrial/Organizational Psychology Journal, 20, 1–27. Google Scholar
Weiss, H. W., & Rupp, D. E. (2011). Experiencing work: An essay on a person-centric work psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 83–97.Google Scholar
Zickar, M. J., & Gibby, R. E. (2007). Four persistent themes throughout the history of I–O psychology in the United States. In Koppes, L. (Ed.), Historical perspectives in industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 61–80). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar