Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-06T21:48:45.826Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Big Data Recommendations for Industrial–Organizational Psychology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2015

Richard A. Guzzo ,
Alexis A. Fink ,
Eden King ,
Scott Tonidandel  and
Ronald S. Landis
Richard A. Guzzo*
Affiliation:
Mercer, Washington, DC
Alexis A. Fink
Affiliation:
Intel, Portland, Oregon
Eden King
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, George Mason University
Scott Tonidandel
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Davidson College
Ronald S. Landis
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Illinois Institute of Technology
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Richard A. Guzzo, Mercer, 1050 Connecticut Avenue, Suite 700, Washington, DC 20036. E-mail: rick.guzzo@mercer.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The world is awash in data. Data is being created and stored at ever-increasing rates through a variety of new methods and technologies. Data is accumulating in all sorts of accessible places. Much of that data is of great interest to industrial–organizational (I-O) psychologists, often in ways never anticipated by those who develop technologies and processes that generate and store that data. I-O psychologists also generate data in the course of research and practice in ways that, especially if joined with data originating from other sources, create giant datasets. This abundance of data—variables, measurements, observations, facts—can be used to inform a vast number of issues in research and practice. This is the new “big data” world, and beyond opportunities, this new world also presents challenges and potential hazards.

Type
Focal Article
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 8 , Issue 4 , December 2015 , pp. 491 - 508
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Psychological Association. (2010). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Azevedo, R., Harley, J., Trevors, G., Duffy, M., Feyzi-Behnagh, R., Bouchet, F., & Landis, R. S. (2013). Using trace data to examine the complex roles of cognitive, metacognitive, and emotional self-regulatory processes during learning with multi-agent systems. In Azevedo, R. & Aleven, V. (Eds.), International handbook of metacognition and learning technologies: Vol. 99. Springer International Handbooks of Education. New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azevedo, R., Landis, R. S., Yeasin, M., Bouchet, F., Harley, J., Burlinson, J., Rahman, A. K. M., Hossain, G., Feyzi-Behnagh, R., Trevors, G., & Duffy, M. (2011, October). Detecting, tracking, and modeling cognitive, affective, and metacognitive regulatory processes to optimize learning with MetaTutor. Paper presented at the National Science Foundation REESE Principal Investigator's Meeting, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Caputo, P., & Boyce, A. (2015, April). Data science in human capital research and analytics. Symposium presented at the 30th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Dullaghan, T. R., Biga, A., Legge, A., & Kaminsky, S. (2015, April). Building data models through big data analytics: The JetBlue experience. In Roberts, S. J. (Chair), Big data or big deal: Conducting impactful research in organizations. Symposium presented at the 30th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Fink, A. A. (2015, April). Applying big data approaches to I-O problems. In Roberts, S. J. (Chair), Big data or big deal: Conducting impactful research in organizations. Symposium presented at the 30th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Guzzo, R. A., Nalbantian, H. N., & Parra, L. F. (2014). A big data, say-do approach to climate and culture: A consulting perspective. In Schneider, B. & Barbera, K. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of climate and culture (pp. 197–211). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hanges, P. J., & Park, J. J. (2015). Pupillometry, test micro-behaviors, and the search for culture-fair tests. Unpublished manuscript. Retrieved from http://www.hangeslab.umd.eduGoogle Scholar
Harley, J. M., Bouchet, F., Papaioannou, N., Carter, C., Trevors, G., Behnagh, R., Azevedo, R., & Landis, R. S. (2014, April). Assessing learning with MetaTutor, a multi-agent hypermedia learning environment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Hawthorne, D., & Miller, E. P. (2015, April). Bringing together multiple data streams into a river of information. In Roberts, S. J. (Chair), Big data or big deal: Conducting impactful research in organizations. Symposium presented at the 30th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Hernandez, I., Newman, D., & Jeon, G. (2015). Twitter analysis: Methods for data management and validation of a word count dictionary to measure city-level job satisfaction. In Tonidandel, S., King, E., & Cortina's, J. (Eds.), Big data at work: The data science revolution and organizational psychology. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
King, E. B., Hebl, M. R., Botsford Morgan, W., & Ahmad, A. (2013). Experimental field research on sensitive organizational topics. Organizational Research Methods, 16, 501–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobayashi, V. B., Mol, S. T., Berkers, H. A., Kismihók, G., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2015). Augmenting organizational research with the text mining toolkit: All aboard! Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Kozlowski, S. W. J., Chao, G. T., Chang, C. D., & Fernandez, R. (2015). Using big data to advance the science of team effectiveness. In Tonidandel, S., King, E., & Cortina's, J. (Eds.), Big data at work: The data science revolution and organizational psychology. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
McAfee, A., & Brynjolfsson, E. (2012). Big data: The management revolution. Harvard Business Review, 60, 60–66.Google Scholar
Mitchell, D., Blair, M., & Speer, A. (2015, April). Big data at Sprint: Front-line employee insights. In Roberts, S. J. (Chair), Big data or big deal: Conducting impactful research in organizations. Symposium presented at the 30th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Ohm, P. (2010). Broken promises of privacy: Responding to the surprising failure of anonymization. UCLA Law Review, 57, 1701–1777.Google Scholar
Priluck, J. (2015, April 25). When bots collude. The New Yorker. Retrieved from http://www.newyorker.com/business/currency/when-bots-colludeGoogle Scholar
Putka, D. J., Beatty, A. S., & Reeder, M. C. (2015). Modern prediction methods: New perspectives on a common problem. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Roberts, S. J., Sinnett, S. A., & Walzer, A. S. (2015, April). Best of both worlds: Integrating big data into HR research. In S. J. Roberts (Chair), Big data or big deal: Conducting impactful research in organizations. Symposium presented at the 30th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. (2003). Principles for the validation and use of personnel selection procedures (4th ed.). Bowling Green, OH: Author.Google Scholar
Sweeney, L. (2000). Uniqueness of simple demographics in the U.S. population (Working Paper LIDAP-WP4, 2000). Pittsburg, PA: Laboratory for International Data Privacy.Google Scholar
Taylor, B. (2015, April). Data science in human capital research and analytics. Symposium presented at the 30th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar