Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T14:22:48.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A brighter vision of the potential of open science for benefiting practice: A ManyOrgs proposal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2023

Christopher M. Castille Open the ORCID record for Christopher M. Castille [Opens in a new window] ,
Tine Köhler Open the ORCID record for Tine Köhler [Opens in a new window]  and
Ernest H. O’Boyle Open the ORCID record for Ernest H. O’Boyle [Opens in a new window]
Christopher M. Castille*
Affiliation:
Nicholls State University, Thibodaux, USA
Tine Köhler
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
Ernest H. O’Boyle
Affiliation:
Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
*
*Corresponding author: Email: christopher.castille@nicholls.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 15 , Issue 4 , December 2022 , pp. 546 - 550
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Banks, G. C., O’Boyle, E. H. Jr, Pollack, J. M., White, C. D., Batchelor, J. H., Whelpley, C. E., Abston, K. A., Bennett, A. A., & Adkins, C. L. (2016). Questions about questionable research practices in the field of management: A guest commentary. Journal of Management, 42(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315619011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castille, C. M., Kreamer, L. M., Albritton, B. H., Banks, G. C., & Rogelberg, S. G. (2022). The open science challenge: Adopt one practice that enacts widely shared values. Journal of Business and Psychology, 37, 459–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-022-09806-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzzo, R., Schneider, B., & Nalbantian, H. (2022) Open science, closed doors: The perils and potential of open science for research in practice. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 15(4), 495–515.Google Scholar
Köhler, T., & Cortina, J. M. (2021). Play it again, Sam! An analysis of constructive replication in the organizational sciences. Journal of Management, 47(2), 488–518. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206319843985 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landy, J. F., Jia, M. (Liam), Ding, I. L., Viganola, D., Tierney, W., Dreber, A., Johannesson, M., Pfeiffer, T., Ebersole, C. R., Gronau, Q. F., Ly, A., van den Bergh, D., Marsman, M., Derks, K., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Proctor, A., Bartels, D. M., Bauman, C. W., Brady, W. J., … Uhlmann, E. L. (2020). Crowdsourcing hypothesis tests: Making transparent how design choices shape research results. Psychological Bulletin, 146(5), 451–479. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000220 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moshontz, H., Campbell, L., Ebersole, C. R., IJzerman, H., Urry, H. L., Forscher, P. S., Grahe, J. E., McCarthy, R. J., Musser, E. D., Antfolk, J., Castille, C. M., Evans, T. R., Fiedler, S., Flake, J. K., Forero, D. A., Janssen, S. M. J., Keene, J. R., Protzko, J., Aczel, B., … Chartier, C. R. (2018). The psychological science accelerator: Advancing psychology through a distributed collaborative network. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918797607 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uhlmann, E. L., Ebersole, C., Chartier, C., Errington, T., Kidwell, M., Lai, C. K., McCarthy, R. J., Riegelman, A., Silberzahn, R., & Nosek, B. A. (2019). Scientific utopia III: Crowdsourcing science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(5), 711–733. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1177/1745691619850561 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed