Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-m9pkr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T10:09:11.103Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Opening Up Perspectives on Plural Leadership

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Viviane Sergi*
Affiliation:
ESG UQAM
Jean-Louis Denis
Affiliation:
École nationale d’administration publique
Ann Langley
Affiliation:
HEC Montréal
*
E-mail: sergi.viviane@uqam.ca, Address: ESG UQAM, Case postale 8888, succursale Centre-ville, Montréal (QC), Canada H3C 3P8

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvarez, J. L., & Svejenova, S. (2005). Sharing executive power: Roles and relationships at the top. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Bolden, R., Petrov, G., & Gosling, J. (2009). Distributed leadership in higher education: Rhetoric and reality. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 37, 257277. Google Scholar
Chreim, S., Williams, B. E. B., Janz, L., & Dastmalchian, A. (2010). Change agency in a primary health care context: The case of distributed leadership. Health Care Management Review, 35, 187199. Google Scholar
Court, M. (2004). Using narrative and discourse analysis in researching co-principalships. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 17, 579603. Google Scholar
Crevani, L., Lindgren, M., & Packendorff, J. (2010). Leadership, not leaders: On the study of leadership as practices and interactions. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 26, 7786. Google Scholar
Crosby, B. C. & Bryson, J. M. (2010). Integrative leadership and the creation and maintenance of cross-sector collaborations. Leadership Quarterly, 21, 211230. Google Scholar
Currie, G., Lockett, A., & Suhomlinova, O. (2009). The institutionalization of distributed leadership: A “Catch-22” in English public services. Human Relations, 62, 17351761. Google Scholar
Davis, J. P. & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2011). Rotating leadership and collaborative innovation: Recombination processes in symbiotic relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56, 159201. Google Scholar
Denis, J.-L., Lamothe, L., & Langley, A. (2001). The dynamics of collective leadership and strategic change in pluralistic organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 809837. Google Scholar
Denis, J.-L., Langley, A., & Cazale, L. (1996). Leadership and strategic change under ambiguity. Organization Studies, 17, 673699. Google Scholar
Denis, J.-L., Langley, A., & Pineault, M. (2000). Becoming a leader in a complex organization. Journal of Management Studies, 37, 10631100. Google Scholar
Denis, J.-L., Langley, A., & Rouleau, L. (2007). Strategizing in pluralistic contexts: Rethinking theoretical frames. Human Relations, 60, 179215. Google Scholar
Denis, J.-L., Langley, A., & Sergi, V. (2012). Leadership in the plural. Academy of Management Annals, 6, 211283.Google Scholar
Drath, W., McCauley, C., Palus, C., Van Velsor, E., O’Connor, P., & McGuire, J. (2008). Direction, alignment, commitment: Toward a more integrative ontology of leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 19, 635653. Google Scholar
Fjellvaer, H. (2010). Dual and unitary leadership: Managing ambiguity in pluralistic organizations. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration.Google Scholar
Follett, M. P. (1924). Creative experience. New York, NY: Longmans, Green and Co. Google Scholar
Gibb, C. A. (1954). Leadership. In Lindzay, G. (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology, 2 (pp. 877917). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Google Scholar
Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. Leadership Quarterly, 13, 423451.Google Scholar
Gronn, P. (2008). The future of distributed leadership. Journal of Educational Administration, 46, 141158. Google Scholar
Hodgson, R. C., Levinson, D. J., & Zaleznik, A. (1965). The executive role constellation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Google Scholar
Hollander, E. P., & Julian, J. W. (1969). Contemporary trends in the analysis of leadership processes. Psychological bulletin, 71, 387397. Google Scholar
Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2000). Leadership in the shaping and implementation agendas?: How things happen in a collaboration (not quite) joined-up world. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 11591175. Google Scholar
Lindgren, M., Packendorff, J., & Tham, H. (2010). Relational dysfunctionality?: Leadership interactions in a Sarbanes-Oxley Act implementation project. European Journal of International Management, 5, 1329. Google Scholar
Lichtenstein, B. B., & Plowman, D. A. (2009). The leadership of emergence: A complex systems leadership theory of emergence at successive organizational levels. Leadership Quarterly, 20, 617630. Google Scholar
Maxcy, B. D. & Nguyen, T. S. T. (2006). The politics of distributing leadership: Reconsidering leadership distribution in two Texas elementary schools. Educational Policy, 20, 163196. Google Scholar
Meindl, J. R., Ehrlich, S. B., & Dukerich, J. M. (1985). The romance of leadership. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 78102. Google Scholar
Reid, W., & Karambayya, R. (2009). Impact of dual executive leadership dynamics in creative organizations. Human Relations, 62, 10731112. Google Scholar
Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Google Scholar
Vine, B., Holmes, J., Marra, M., Pfeifer, D., & Jackson, B. (2008). Exploring co-leadership talk through interactional sociolinguistics. Leadership, 4, 339360. Google Scholar
Yammarino, F. J., Salas, E., Serban, A., Shirreffs, K. & Shuffler, M. L. (2012). Collectivistic leadership approaches: Putting the “we” in leadership science and practice. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5, 382402.Google Scholar