Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-l82ql Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T02:33:42.674Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Duration of Colonization with Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Among Patients in the Intensive Care Unit: Implications for Intervention

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

Glenn A. Ridenour ,
Edward S. Wong ,
Mark A. Call  and
Michael W. Climo
Glenn A. Ridenour
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Disease, Hunter Holmes McGuire Veteran Affairs Medical Center, and theVirginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia
Edward S. Wong
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Disease, Hunter Holmes McGuire Veteran Affairs Medical Center, and theVirginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia
Mark A. Call
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Disease, Hunter Holmes McGuire Veteran Affairs Medical Center, and theVirginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia
Michael W. Climo*
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Disease, Hunter Holmes McGuire Veteran Affairs Medical Center, and theVirginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia
*
McGuire VAMC, 1201 Broad Rock Boulevard, Section 111-C, Richmond, VA 23249 (michael.climo@med.va.gov)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives.

To determine the duration of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization or infection before entry and during hospitalization in the intensive care unit (ICU) and the characteristics of patients who tested positive for MRSA.

Design.

Prospective observational cohort survey.

Setting.

A combined medical and coronary care ICU with 16 single-bed rooms in a 427-bed tertiary care Veteran Affairs Medical Center

Patients.

A total of 720 ICU patients associated with 845 ICU admissions were followed up for the detection of MRSA from January 13, 2003, to October 12, 2003. MRSA colonization was detected in patients by using active surveillance cultures (ASCs) of nasal swab specimens obtained within 48 hours of ICU entry and 3 times weekly thereafter. The duration of colonization during ICU stay and before ICU entry was calculated after a review of surveillance culture results, clinical culture results, and medical history.

Results.

Ninety-three (11.0%) of 845 ICU admissions involved patients who were colonized with MRSA at the time of ICU entry, and 21 admissions (2.5%) involved patients who acquired MRSA during ICU stay. ASCs were positive for MRSA in 84 (73.6%) of the 114 admissions associated with MRSA positivity and were the sole means of identifying MRSA in 50 cases (43.8%). More than half of the MRSA-associated admissions involved patients who were transferred from hospital wards. The total bed-days of care for 38 admissions involving patients who tested positive for MRSA before ICU entry (1131 days) was nearly 20% higher than the total bed-days of care for all admissions associated with MRSA positivity (970 days). Admissions involving MRSA-positive patients were associated with a longer length of hospitalization before ICU entry (P<.001), longer length of ICU stay (P<.001), longer overall length of hospitalization (P<.001), and greater inpatient mortality than admissions involving MRSA-negative patients (P<.001). A total of 22.8% of all bed-care days were dedicated to MRSA-positive patients in the ICU, and 55 (48.2%) of 114 admissions associated with MRSA positivity involved patients who were colonized for the duration of their ICU stay.

Conclusions.

In our unit, ASCs were an effective means to identify MRSA colonization among patients admitted to the ICU. Unfortunately, the majority of identified patients had long durations of stay in our own hospital before ICU entry, with prolonged MRSA colonization. Enhanced efforts to control MRSA will have to account for the prevalence of MRSA within hospital wards and to direct control efforts at these patients in the future.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , March 2006 , pp. 271 - 278
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Stefani, S, Varaldo, PE. Epidemiology of methicillin-resistant staphylococci in Europe. Clin Microbiol Infect 2003; 9:1179–1186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Zinn, CS, Westh, H, Rosdahl, VT. An international multicenter study of antimicrobial resistance and typing of hospital Staphylococcus aureus isolates from 21 laboratories in 19 countries or states. Microb Drug Resist 2004; 10:160–168.Google Scholar
3.Cosgrove, SE, Sakoulas, G, Perencevich, EN, Schwaber, MJ, Karchmer, AW, Carmeli, Y. Comparison of mortality associated with methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a metaanalysis. Clin Infect Dis 2003; 36:53–59.Google Scholar
4.Engemann, JJ, Carmeli, Y, Cosgrove, SE, et al. Adverse clinical and economic outcomes attributable to methicillin resistance among patients with Staphylococcus aureus surgical site infection. Clin Infect Dis 2003; 36:592–598.Google Scholar
5.Blot, SI, Vandewoude, KH, Hoste, EA, Colardyn, FA. Outcome and attributable mortality in critically Iill patients with bacteremia involving methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Arch Intern Med 2002; 162:2229–2235.Google Scholar
6.Ibelings, MM, Bruining, HA. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: acquisition and risk of death in patients in the intensive care unit. Eur J Surg 1998; 164:411–418.Google Scholar
7.Theaker, C, Ormond-Walshe, S, Azadian, B, Soni, N. MRSA in the critically ill. J Hosp Infect 2001; 48:98–102.Google Scholar
8.Kim, T, Oh, PI, Simor, AE. The economic impact of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Canadian hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2001; 22:99–104.Google Scholar
9.Garner, JS. Guideline for isolation precautions in hospitals. The Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1996; 17:53–80.Google Scholar
10.Boyce, JM. Consequences of inaction: importance of infection control practices. Clin Infect Dis 2001; 33(Suppl 3):S133–S137.Google Scholar
11.Muto, CA, Jernigan, JA, Ostrowsky, BE, et al. SHEA guideline for preventing nosocomial transmission of multidrug-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2003; 24:362–386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Farr, BM. Prevention and control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2004; 17:317–322.Google Scholar
13.Karchmer, TB, Durbin, LJ, Simonton, BM, Farr, BM. Cost-effectiveness of active surveillance cultures and contact/droplet precautions for control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Hosp Infect 2002; 51:126–132.Google Scholar
14.Papia, G, Louie, M, Tralla, A, Johnson, C, Collins, V, Simor, AE. Screening high-risk patients for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus on admission to the hospital: is it cost effective? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999; 20:473–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Girou, E, Pujade, G, Legrand, P, Cizeau, F, Brun-Buisson, C. Selective screening of carriers for control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in high-risk hospital areas with a high level of endemic MRSA. Clin Infect Dis 1998; 27:543–550.Google Scholar
16.Manian, FA, Senkel, D, Zack, J, Meyer, L. Routine screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among patients newly admitted to an acute rehabilitation unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2002; 23:516–519.Google Scholar
17.Murray-Leisure, KA, Geib, S, Graceley, D, et al. Control of epidemic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1990; 11:343–350.Google Scholar
18.Troillet, N, Carmeli, Y, Samore, MH, et al. Carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at hospital admission. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1998; 19:181–185.Google Scholar
19.Boyce, JM, Havill, NL, Kohan, C, Dumigan, DG, Ligi, CE. Do infection control measures work for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2004; 25:395–401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Jernigan, JA, Clemence, MA, Stott, GA, et al. Control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at a university hospital: one decade later. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1995; 16:686–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Arnold, MS, Dempsey, JM, Fishman, M, McAuley, PJ, Tibert, C, Vallande, NC. The best hospital practices for controlling methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: on the cutting edge. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2002; 23:69–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Selkon, JB, Stokes, ER, Ingham, HR. The role of an isolation unit in the control of hospital infection with methicillin-resistant staphylococci. J Hosp Infect 1980; 1:41–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Jernigan, JA, Titus, MG, Groschel, DH, Getchell-White, S, Farr, BM. Effectiveness of contact isolation during a hospital outbreak of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Am J Epidemiol 1996; 143:496–504.Google Scholar
24.Thompson, RL, Cabezudo, I, Wenzel, RP. Epidemiology of nosocomial infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Ann Intern Med 1982;97:309–317.Google Scholar
25.Verhoef, J, Beaujean, D, Blok, H, et al. A Dutch approach to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1999; 18:461–466.Google Scholar
26.Nijssen, S, Bonten, MJ, Weinstein, RA. Are active microbiological surveillance and subsequent isolation needed to prevent the spread of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus? Clin Infect Dis 2005; 40:405–409.Google Scholar