Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-lrf7s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T03:21:08.734Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hand Dexterity in Hospital Personnel with Multiple Needlestick Injuries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

J.E. Casanova*
Affiliation:
Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
G.P. Barnas
Affiliation:
Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
J. Gollup
Affiliation:
Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
J.S. Casanova
Affiliation:
Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
*
Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee County Medical Complex, 8700 W. Wisconsin Ave., Milwaukee, WI 53226

Abstract

Objective:

To test the hypothesis that multiple needlestick injuries in hospital employees may he due to intrinsic deficits in hand dexterity.

Design:

A case-control study comparing employees with multiple reported needlestick injuries to those with none. Hand dexterity was tested using the Purdue Pegboard Test, a standardized validated test of hand dexterity.

Setting:

A 300-bed, acute care teaching hospital.

Participants:

Fifteen hospital employees who sustained four or more injuries were compared to 19 controls.

Results:

No differences were detected in hand dexterity between the case and control groups.

Conclusions:

While employees with multiple needlestick injuries accounted for 85% of reported injuries, underlying factors responsible for injuries in this high-risk subgroup do not include measurable deficits in hand dexterity.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. De Laune, S. Risk reduction through testing, screening and infection control precautions with special emphasis on needle-stick injuries. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1990;ll(suppl):563–565.Google Scholar
2. Heald, AE, Ransohoff, DE Needlestick injuries among resident physicians. J Gen Intern Med 1990;5:389393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. American Medical Association. Patterns appearing in how, why needlesticks occur. American Medical News May 4, 1992:35.Google Scholar
4. Purdue Pegboard Instruction Manual. Lafayette, Indiana. Lafayette Instrument Company.Google Scholar
5. Jones, E, Hanly, JG, Mooney, R, et al. Strength and function in the normal and rheumatoid hand. J Rheumatol 1991;18:13131318.Google ScholarPubMed
6. Casanova, JE, Casanova, JS, Young, MJ. Hand function in patients with diabetes mellitus. South Med J 1991;84:11111113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Squire, D, Giachino, AA, Profitt, AW, Heaney, C. Objective comparison of manual dexterity in physicians and surgeons. Can J Surg 1989;32:367370.Google ScholarPubMed
8. Young, MJ, Bresnitz, EA, Strom, BL. Sample size nomograms for interpreting negative clinical studies. Ann Intern Med 1983;99:248251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed