Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qlrfm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T17:12:18.581Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nonincreased Risk of Nosocomial Infection During a 22-Day Housekeeping Personnel Strike in a Tertiary Hospital

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

Miguel Delgado-Rodríquez*
Affiliation:
Department of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Hospital Virgen de las Nieves, University of Granada, Granada, Spain Unit of Clinical Epidemiology and Service of Preventive Medicine, Hospital Virgen de las Nieves, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
Amalia Ramos-Cuadra
Affiliation:
Department of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Hospital Virgen de las Nieves, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
Aurora Bueno-Cavanillas
Affiliation:
Department of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Hospital Virgen de las Nieves, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
Elena Jimenez-Romano
Affiliation:
Department of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Hospital Virgen de las Nieves, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
Jose Guillen-Solvas
Affiliation:
Department of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Hospital Virgen de las Nieves, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
Ramon Galvez-Vargas
Affiliation:
Department of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Hospital Virgen de las Nieves, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
*
Departamento de Medicina Preventiva, Facultad de Medicina, Avenida de Madrid 11, 18012-Granada, Spain

Abstract

Background:

From April 2-23, 1992, the housekeeping staff of the University of Granada Hospital was on strike. Measures were implemented to minimize the effects of the strike on patients' health and especially to diminish the risk of hospital infection.

Objective:

To assess the risk of nosocomial infection during the housekeeping personnel strike.

Setting:

An 800-bed, tertiary care hospital.

Methods:

A case-cohort approach was used. One hundred forty-eight infected patients (with 184 hospital infections) were detected prospectively from March 1, 1992, to May 31, 1992. A sample of 459 of the base population (patients admitted during the same period) was selected. Information on relevant risk factors for hospital infection was abstracted from patients' clinical charts after hospital discharge. Crude odds ratios and adjusted (by proportional hazards model) relative risks (RRs) for the strike period were estimated.

Results:

Risk of nosocomial infection did not increase during the strike period (multiple-risk factor adjusted RR= 0.99, 0.96 to 1.01/day of strike). Similar results were observed for major sites of infection (especially surgical wound) and major areas of the hospital (including gynecology, surgery, and intensive care).

Conclusion:

We concluded that there was no increase in the risk of nosocomial infection during the housekeeping strike.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Collins, BJ. The hospital environment: how clean should a hospital be? J Hosp Infect 1988;11(suppl A):5356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Prentice, RL. A case-cohort design for epidemiologic studies and disease prevention trials. Biometrika 1986;73:111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Wacholder, S, Gail, M, Pee, D. Selecting an efficient design for assessing exposure-disease relationships in an assembled cohort. Biometrics 1991;47:6376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Wacholder, S. Practical considerations in choosing between the case-cohort and nested case-control designs. Epidemiology 1991;2:155158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Greenland, S. Adjustment of risk ratios in case-base studies (hybrid epidemiologic designs). Stat Med 1986;5:579584.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Kleinbaum, DG, Kupper, LL, Morgenstern, H. Epidemiologie Research. Principles and Quantitative Methods. Belmont, CA: Lifetime Learning Publications; 1982.Google Scholar
7. Miettinen, OS. Theoretical Epidemiology. Principles of Ocurrence Research in Medicine. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Ine; 1985.Google Scholar
8. Bueno-Cavanillas, A, Delgado-Rodríquez, M, Cueto-Espinar, A, Galvez-Vargas, R. Vigilancia epidemiologica de la infección hospitalaria. Rev Clin Esp 1987;181:9297.Google Scholar
9. Garner, JS, Jarvis, WR, Emori, TG, Horan, TC, Hughes, JM. CDC definitions for nosocomial infections. Am J Infect Control 1988;16:128140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Dean, AD, Dean, JA, Burton, AH, Dicker, RC. Epilnfo Version 5.0: A Word Processing, Database, and Statistics Program for Epidemiology on Microcomputers. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control; 1990.Google Scholar
11. Miettinen, OS. Design options in epidemiologic research: an update. Scand J Work Environ Health 1982;8(suppl 1):714.Google ScholarPubMed
12. Khan, HA, Sempos, CT Statistical Methods in Epidemiology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1989.Google Scholar
13. Selwyn, S. Hospital infection: the first 2500 years. J Hosp Infect 1991;18(suppl A):564.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Cruicksank, R, Godber, GE. The aerial spread of streptococcal infections. Lancet 1940;1:741746.Google Scholar
15. Daschner, E Unnecessary and ecological cost of hospital infection. J Hosp Infect 1991; 18 (suppl A):7378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Keene, JH. Medical waste: a minimal hazard. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1991;12:682685.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. McGowan, JE Jr. Environmental factors in nosocomial infection—a selective focus. Rev Infect Dis 1981;3:760769.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Walter, CW. Role of bactériologie survey cultures in control of nosocomial infection. JAMA 1974;229:578579.Google Scholar
19. Shirani, KZ, McManus, AT, Vaughan, GM, McManus, WE Pruitt, BA Jr, Mason, AD Jr. Effects of environment on infection in bum patients. Arch Surg 1986;121:3136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Wenzel, RR Discussion. Arch Surg 1986;121:3536.Google Scholar
21. Feinstein, AR. Clinical Epidemiology. The Architecture of Clinical Research. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders Co; 1985.Google Scholar