Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-dvmhs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-06T03:14:15.964Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nosocomial Infection in a High Risk Cohort: An Illustration of a Sampling Method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Katherine Hill Chavigny  and
Janet Fischer
Katherine Hill Chavigny*
Affiliation:
Center for Public Health Studies, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon North Carolina Memorial Hospital, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Janet Fischer
Affiliation:
Center for Public Health Studies, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon North Carolina Memorial Hospital, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
*
Center for Public Health Studies, Portland State University, Portland, OR 97207
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Patients in two acute care university hospitals were entered into the study using the following method: twenty patients were selected each day from all floors/units in each hospital until the hospital communities had been surveyed only once. A total of 762 hospital patients were identified for the study, and the history of each patient was then abstracted from their charts. The data were analyzed as an historical cohort study design. The two hospital samples were compared to show the effects of the non-random sampling method using one hospital as a comparison group for the other. Expected associations between nosocomial infection and known risk factors were compared and contrasted between the hospitals using cumulative incidence rates and relative risk ratios. The average length of stay of the group of patients in each hospital was extended from a mean of ten days to a mean of 30 days. The only significant difference between the two hospital cohorts was an age effect. The advantages and disadvantages of this method for selecting a long staying cohort at high risk for nosocomial infection in acute care facilities are detailed.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , February 1983 , pp. 19 - 24
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Abbott, DN, Infection control today. Presented at the Symposium on Infection Control, Rush Presbyterian University, Chicago, September, 1980.Google Scholar
2.MacMahon, B, Pugh, TF, Epidemiology: Principles and Methods. Boston, Little Brown & Co, 1970.Google Scholar
3.Outline for the surveillance and control of nosocomial infection. US Dept of Health and Human Services (PHS). Atlanta, Center for Disease Control, 1970.Google Scholar
4.NNIS Reports, 1970-1979. US Dept Health, Education, and Welfare (PHS). Atlanta, Center for Disease Control, 1982.Google Scholar
5.Feingold, DS, Hospital acquired infection. N Engl J Med 1970;282:1384–1391.Google Scholar
6.Meittinen, OS, Proportions of disease caused or prevented by a given exposure, trait or intervention. Am J Epidemiol 1974;99:325–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Remington, RD, Schork, MA, Statistics With Application to the Biological and Health Sciences. New Jersey, Prentice Hall Ine, 1971.Google Scholar
8.Berkson, J, Limitations of the application of fourfold table analysis of hospital data. Biometrica 1946;2:43–47.Google ScholarPubMed