Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T19:17:04.029Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reply to Bouvet et al

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Andreas Wittmann ,
Nenad Kralj  and
Friedrich Hofmann
Andreas Wittmann*
Affiliation:
Department of Safety Engineering, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany
Nenad Kralj
Affiliation:
Department of Safety Engineering, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany
Friedrich Hofmann
Affiliation:
Department of Safety Engineering, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany
*
Abteilung Sicher-heitstechnik-ARBMED, Bergische Universität Wuppertal, Gaußstraße 20, D-42119 Wuppertal, Germany( andwitt@uni-wuppertal.de)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Brief
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 30 , Issue 9 , September 2009 , pp. 929
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Bouvet, E, Pellissier, G, Abiteboul, D, L'Hériteau, F. Is double gloving an effective barrier to protect surgeons against blood exposure due to needlestick injury [letter]? The Group for the Prevention of Occupational Infections in Healthcare Workers. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2009;30:928–929.Google Scholar
2.Kralj, N, Beie, M, Hofmann, F. Surgical gloves: how well do they protect against infections [in German]? Gesundheitswesen 1999;61:398–403.Google Scholar