Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T09:24:01.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tuberculosis in Healthcare Workers: A Molecular Epidemiologic Study in San Francisco

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

Adrian Ong
Affiliation:
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, Stanford, California Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California
Irina Rudoy
Affiliation:
Tuberculosis Control Section, San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, Stanford, California
Leah C. Gonzalez
Affiliation:
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, Stanford, California
Jennifer Creasman
Affiliation:
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, Stanford, California
L. Masae Kawamura
Affiliation:
Tuberculosis Control Section, San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, Stanford, California
Charles L. Daley
Affiliation:
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, Stanford, California

Abstract

Objective.

Healthcare workers (HCWs) are at risk of becoming infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis through occupational exposure. To identify HCWs who became infected and developed tuberculosis as a result of their work, we studied the molecular epidemiology of tuberculosis in HCWs.

Design.

Eleven-year prospective cohort molecular epidemiology study.

Setting.

City and County of San Francisco, California.

Patients.

All persons reported with tuberculosis between 1993 and 2003. HCWs were identified from the San Francisco Tuberculosis Control Section's database, and mycobacterial isolates from culture-positive subjects were analyzed by IS6110-based genotyping. RESULTS. Of 2510 cases of tuberculosis reported during the study period, 31 (1.2%) occurred in HCWs: the median age of the HCWs was 37 years, and 11 (35%) were male. HCWs were more likely than non-HCWs to be younger (P = .0036), born in the United States (P = .0004), and female (P = .0003) and to not be homeless (P = .010). The rate of tuberculosis among HCWs remained constant during the study period, despite a significant decrease in the overall case rate in San Francisco. Work-related transmission was documented in at least 10 (32%) of 31 HCWs, including 4 of 8 HCWs whose isolates were part of genotypically determined clusters. Only 1 of 7 cases of tuberculosis in HCWs after 1999 was documented as being work related.

Conclusions.

Although most cases of tuberculosis in HCWs, as in non-HCWs, developed as a result of endogenous reactivation of latent infection, at least half of clustered cases of tuberculosis in HCWs were related to work. The number of work-related cases of tuberculosis in HCWs decreased during the study period.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Bowden, KM, McDiarmid, MA. Occupationally acquired tuberculosis: what's known. J Occup Med 1994; 36:320325.Google Scholar
2.Sepkowitz, KA. Tuberculosis and the health care worker: a historical perspective. Ann Intern Med 1994; 120:7179.Google Scholar
3.Beck-Sague, C, Dooley, SW, Hutton, MD, et al. Hospital outbreak of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis infections: factors in transmission to staff and HIV-infected patients. JAMA 1992; 268:12801286.Google Scholar
4.Edlin, BR, Tokars, JI, Grieco, MH, et al. An outbreak of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis among hospitalized patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. N Engl J Med 1992; 326:15141521.Google Scholar
5.Fischl, MA, Uttamchandani, RB, Daikos, GL, et al. An outbreak of tuberculosis caused by multiple-drug-resistant tubercle bacilli among patients with HIV infection. Ann Intern Med 1992; 117:177183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Pearson, ML, Jereb, JA, Frieden, TR, et al. Nosocomial transmission of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a risk to patients and health care workers. Ann Intern Med 1992; 117:191196.Google Scholar
7.Field, MJ. Tuberculosis in the Workplace—Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2000; Available at http://www.nap.edu/books/0309073308/html/index.ntml.ed. Accessed January 10, 2005.Google Scholar
8.Kenyon, TA, Ridzon, R, Luskin-Hawk, R, et al. A nosocomial outbreak of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Ann Intern Med 1997; 127:3236.Google Scholar
9.Bailey, TC, Fraser, VJ, Spitznagel, EL, Dunagan, WC. Risk factors for a positive tuberculin skin test among employees of an urban, midwestern teaching hospital. Ann Intern Med 1995; 122:580585.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Bangsberg, DR, Crowley, K, Moss, A, Dobkin, JF, McGregor, C, New, HC. Reduction in tuberculin skin-test conversions among medical house staff associated with improved tuberculosis infection control practices. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1997; 18:566570.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Blumberg, HM, Sotir, M, Erwin, M, Bachman, R, Shulman, JA. Risk of house staff tuberculin skin test conversion in an area with a high incidence of tuberculosis. Clin Infect Dis 1998; 27:826833.Google Scholar
12.Louther, J, Rivera, P, Feldman, J, Villa, N, DeHovitz, J, Sepkowitz, KA. Risk of tuberculin conversion according to occupation among health care workers at a New York City hospital. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997; 156:201205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Recommendation for Counting Reported Tuberculosis Cases. Atlanta, GA: Public Health Services, US Department of Health and Human Services; 1993.Google Scholar
14.Labor Market Information Division. Labor Market Info. Sacramento, CA: California State Employment Development Department; 2006. Available at http://www.labormarketinfo.edd.ca.gov/. Accessed January 10, 2005.Google Scholar
15.van Embden, JD, Cave, MD, Crawford, JT, et al. Strain identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by DNA fingerprinting: recommendations for a standardized methodology. J Clin Microbiol 1993; 31:406409.Google Scholar
16.Ross, BC, Dwyer, B. Rapid, simple method for typing isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by using the polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol 1993;31:329334.Google Scholar
17.Chaves, F, Yang, Z, el Hajj, H, et al. Usefulness of the secondary probe pTBN12 in DNA fingerprinting of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol 1996; 34:11181123.Google Scholar
18.Jensen, PA, Lambert, LA, Iademarco, MF, Ridzon, R, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guidelines for preventing the transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in health-care facilities, 2005. MMWR Recomm Rep 2005; 57:1141.Google Scholar
19.Berman, J, Levin, ML, Orr, ST, Desi, L. Tuberculosis risk for hospital employees: analysis of a five-year tuberculin skin testing program. Am J Public Health 1981; 71:12171222.Google Scholar
20.Pleszewski, B, FitzGerald, JM. Tuberculosis among health care workers in British Columbia. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 1998; 2:898903.Google ScholarPubMed
21.Sepkowitz, KA, Friedman, CR, Hafner, A, et al. Tuberculosis among urban health care workers: a study using restriction fragment length polymorphism typing. Clin Infect Dis 1995; 21:10981101.Google Scholar