Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wbk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-19T01:59:36.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Derivation and Validation of a Pulmonary Tuberculosis Prediction Model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Joseph M. Mylotte ,
Jeanne Rodgers ,
Maureen Fassl ,
Kathleen Seibel  and
Angela Vacanti
Joseph M. Mylotte*
Affiliation:
Departments of Medicine and Microbiology, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York Department of Medicine, Erie County Medical Center, Buffalo, New York Infection Control Service, Erie County Medical Center, Buffalo, New York
Jeanne Rodgers
Affiliation:
Infection Control Service, Erie County Medical Center, Buffalo, New York
Maureen Fassl
Affiliation:
Infection Control Service, Erie County Medical Center, Buffalo, New York
Kathleen Seibel
Affiliation:
Infection Control Service, Erie County Medical Center, Buffalo, New York
Angela Vacanti
Affiliation:
Infection Control Service, Erie County Medical Center, Buffalo, New York
*
Infectious Diseases, Erie County Medical Center, 462 Grider St, Buffalo, NY 14215
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

To describe the derivation and validation of a pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) prediction model that would enable early discontinuation of unnecessary respiratory isolation.

Design:

Patients placed in isolation for suspected pulmonary TB were studied retrospectively (derivation cohort) and prospectively (validation cohort). Independent predictors of pulmonary TB in the derivation cohort (January 1992-March 1994) were identified by retrospective analysis. Predictors in the model were assigned weights on the basis of the results of the multivariate analysis in order to quantitate the risk of TB in an individual patient. The prospective validation consisted of application of the model to patients placed in isolation during the period April 1994 to June 1995. The predictability of the model in the derivation and validation cohorts was evaluated using receiver operating characteristics (ROC), curve analysis, and calculation of the area under the ROC curve (AUC).

Setting:

A university-affiliated, urban, public hospital with a large population of prison inmates and patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection.

Interventions:

Prospective application of the prediction model to patients placed in isolation during the validation period.

Results:

Four factors were found to be independent predictors of pulmonary TB among 296 isolation episodes in the derivation cohort: positive acid-fast sputum smear (odds ratio [OR], 5.8; 95% confidence interval [CI95], 3.0-11.0; weight=3 points), localized chest radiograph findings (OR, 2.5; CI95,1.3-4.9; weight=2 points), residence in a correctional facility (OR, 2.3; CI95, 1.2-4.4; weight=2 points), and history of weight loss (OR, 1.8; CI95, 1.0-3.2; weight=1 point). Infection control practitioners applied the model prospectively to 220 isolation episodes. The mean (土SE) AUCs of the ROC curve for the derivation and validation cohorts were not significantly different (.86±.04 vs.86±.07; P=.90). There was a significant decline in the mean duration of isolation from the onset of an automatic TB isolation policy in August 1992 to the end of the study (P=.045 by analysis of variance).

Conclusions:

A pulmonary TB prediction model was derived and validated prospectively in a hospital with a moderately high prevalence of TB. The model quantitated the risk of TB in an individual patient and aided infection control practitioners and primary-care physicians in their decisions to discontinue isolation during the validation period. Utilization of the model was responsible, in part, for a decrease in the mean duration of isolation during the study period. Although the model may not have general applicability due to the uniqueness of the patient population studied, this study illustrates how prediction models can be developed and used effectively to deal with a clinical problem.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 18 , Issue 8 , August 1997 , pp. 554 - 560
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Pearson, ML, Jereb, JA, Frieden, TR, et al. Nosocomial transmission of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis . Ann Intern Med 1992;117:191–196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Fischl, MA, Uttamchandani, RB, Daikos, GL, et al. An outbreak of tuberculosis caused by multiple drug-resistant tubercle bacilli among patients with HIV infection. Ann Intern Med 1992;117:177–183.Google Scholar
3. McGowan, JE. Nosocomial tuberculosis: new progress in control and prevention. Clin Infect Dis 1995;21:489–505.Google Scholar
4. Sepkowitz, KA, Raffalli, J, Riley, L, Kiehn, TE, Armstrong, D. Tuberculosis in the AIDS era. Clin Microbiol Rev 1995;8:180–199.Google Scholar
5. Wurtz, R. Administrative controls for TB: ‘Keep doing what you've always done, and you'll get what you always got.’ Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1996;17:409–411.Google Scholar
6. Pegues, CF, Johnson, DC, Pegues, DA, Spencer, M, Hopkins, CC. Implementation and evaluation of an algorithm for isolation of patients with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1996;17:412–418.Google Scholar
7. Mathur, P, Sacks, L, Auten, G, Sall, R, Levy, C, Gordin, F. Delayed diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in city hospitals. Arch Intern Med 1994;154:306–310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Counsell, SR, Tan, JS, Dittus, RS. Unsuspected pulmonary tuberculosis in a community teaching hospital. Arch Intern Med 1989;149:1274–1278.Google Scholar
9. Centor, R, Schwartz, J. An evaluation of methods for estimating the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Med Decis Making 1985;5:149–156.Google Scholar
10. Hanley, JA, McNeil, BL. The meaning and use of the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982;143:29–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Wasson, JH, Sox, HC, Neff, RK, Goldman, L. Clinical prediction rules. Applications and methodological standards. N Engl J Med 1985;313:793–799.Google Scholar
12. Scott, B, Schmid, M, Nettleman, MD. Early identification and isolation of inpatients at high risk for tuberculosis. Arch Intern Med 1994;154:326–330.Google Scholar
13. Cohen, R, Muzaffar, S, Capellan, J, Azar, H, Chinikamwala, M. The validity of classic symptoms and chest radiographic configuration in predicting pulmonary tuberculosis. Chest 1996;109:420–423.Google Scholar
14. Antonucci, G, Girardi, E, Raviglione, MC, Ippolito, G. Risk factors for tuberculosis in HIV-infected persons. A prospective cohort study. JAMA 1995;274:143–148.Google Scholar
15. El-Solh, A, Mylotte, J, Sherif, S, Serghani, J, Grant, BJB. Validity of a decision tree for predicting active pulmonary tuberculosis from clinical and radiographic data. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997;155:1711–1716.Google Scholar
16. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Tuberculosis morbidity—United States, 1995. MMWR 1996;45:365–370.Google Scholar
17. Brobrowitz, ID. Active tuberculosis undiagnosed until autopsy. Am J Med 1982;72:650–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Couser, JI, Glassroth, J. Tuberculosis. An epidemic in older adults. Clinics Chest Med 1993;14:491–499.Google Scholar
19. Pitlik, SD, Fainstein, V, Bodey, GP. Tuberculosis mimicking cancer: a reminder. Am J Med 1984;76:822–825.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Fischl, MA, Daikos, GL, Uttamchandani, RB, et al. Clinical presentation and outcome of patients with HIV infection and tuberculosis caused by multiple-drug-resistant bacilli. Ann Intern Med 1992;117:184–189.Google Scholar
21. Given, MJ, Khan, A, Reichman, LB. Tuberculosis among patients with AIDS and a control group in an innercity community. Arch Intern Med 1994;154:640–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar