Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-m9pkr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T07:28:11.346Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is Targeted Surveillance Effective for Surgical Site-Infection Control? Results in Digestive Tract Surgery from the Incidence des Infections du Site Opératoire Network

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Marion Olivier ,
Bruno Grandbastien  and
Pascal Astagneau
Marion Olivier
Affiliation:
Regional Center for Nosocomial Infection Control, Paris
Bruno Grandbastien
Affiliation:
Regional Center for Nosocomial Infection Control, Paris Regional Reference University Hospital, Lille, France
Pascal Astagneau*
Affiliation:
Regional Center for Nosocomial Infection Control, Paris Department of Public Health, Pierre Marie Curie University, Paris
*
CCLIN Paris Nord, Institut Biomédical des Cordeliers, 15-21 rue de l'école de medicine, 75006 Paris, France (p.astagne@bhdc.jussieu.fr)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We used 6 years of surgical site infection (SSI) data collected by a surveillance system in northern France to compare targeted and pooled surveillance models. Digestive tract surgery wards were ranked according to SSI risk for herniorraphy, appendectomy, and cholecystectomy. The pooled and targeted models were correlated, despite differences in the number of outlier wards detected, indicating that the ranking of wards according to whether they have met a specified benchmark SSI rate depends on the strategy chosen.

Type
Concise Communications
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 28 , Issue 7 , July 2007 , pp. 883 - 885
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Astagneau, P, Rioux, C, Golliot, F, Brucker, G, and the INCISO Network Study Group. Morbidity and mortality associated with surgical site infections: results from the 1997-1999 INCISO surveillance. I Hosp Infect 2001;48:267–274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Haley, RW, Culver, DH, White, JW, et al.The efficacy of infection surveillance and control programs in preventing nosocomial infections in US hospitals. Am J Epidemiol 1985;121:182–205.Google Scholar
3.Garner, JS, Jarvis, WR, Emori, TG, Horan, TC, Hughes, JM. CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988. Am J Infect Control 1988;16:128–140.Google Scholar
4.Rioux, C, Grandbastien, B, Astagneau, P. The standardized incidence ratio as a reliable tool for surgical-site infections surveillance. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006;27:817–824.Google Scholar
5.Hosmer, D, Lemeshow, S. Applied Logistic Regression. New York: Wiley; 1989.Google Scholar
6.Hanley, JA, McNeil, BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982;143:29–36.Google Scholar
7.Chuang, SC, Lee, KT, Chang, WT. Risks factors for wound infection after cholecystectomy. J Formos Med Assoc 2004;103:607–612.Google ScholarPubMed
8.Smith, RL, Bohl, JK, McElearney, ST. Wound infection after elective colorectal resection. Ann Surg 2004;239:599–605.Google Scholar